These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37997346)

  • 1. The relationship between facial attractiveness and perceived guilt across types of crime.
    Kramer RS; Jarvis JL; Green M; Jones AL
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Dec; ():17470218231218651. PubMed ID: 37997346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mock Jurors' Perceptions of Sexual Assault on a University Campus.
    Pica E; Sheahan CL; Pozzulo J
    J Interpers Violence; 2021 May; 36(9-10):NP5447-NP5465. PubMed ID: 30239260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attractive but guilty: deliberation and the physical attractiveness bias.
    Patry MW
    Psychol Rep; 2008 Jun; 102(3):727-33. PubMed ID: 18763443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. From whose perspective? Differences between actors and observers in determining the voluntariness of guilty pleas.
    Fessinger MB; Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Oct; 46(5):353-371. PubMed ID: 36227320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attributions of guilt and punishment as functions of physical attractiveness and smiling.
    Abel MH; Watters H
    J Soc Psychol; 2005 Dec; 145(6):687-702. PubMed ID: 16334514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. "But He's a Star Football Player!": How Social Status Influences Mock Jurors' Perceptions in a Sexual Assault Case.
    Pica E; Sheahan C; Pozzulo J
    J Interpers Violence; 2020 Oct; 35(19-20):3963-3985. PubMed ID: 29294785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mock-Jurors' Judgements in a Sexual Assault Case: The Influence of Defendant Race and Occupational Status, Delayed Reporting, and Multiple Allegations.
    Fraser BM; Pica E; Pozzulo JD
    J Interpers Violence; 2023 Jul; 38(13-14):7964-7989. PubMed ID: 36762531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attitudinal Predictors of Juror Decisions on Gender and Sexual Minority Defendants.
    Ringger CS
    J Homosex; 2021 Oct; 68(12):2047-2074. PubMed ID: 32069192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of physical attractiveness on evaluations of a male employee's allegation of sexual harassment by his female employer.
    Wuensch KL; Moore CH
    J Soc Psychol; 2004 Apr; 144(2):207-17. PubMed ID: 15074507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of developmental language disorder in a defendant's description on mock jurors' perceptions and judgements.
    Hobson HM; Woodley J; Gamblen S; Brackely J; O'Neill F; Miles D; Westwood C
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2023 Jan; 58(1):189-205. PubMed ID: 36087284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Effect of Delayed Reporting on Mock-Juror Decision-Making in the Era of #MeToo.
    Fraser BM; Pica E; Pozzulo JD
    J Interpers Violence; 2022 Jul; 37(13-14):NP11791-NP11810. PubMed ID: 33636996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gender, Generations, and Guilt: Defendant Gender and Age Affect Jurors' Decisions and Perceptions in an Intimate Partner Homicide Trial.
    Ruva CL; Smith KD; Sykes EC
    J Interpers Violence; 2023 Dec; 38(23-24):12089-12112. PubMed ID: 37602736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of sex on mock jurors' verdicts across type of child abuse cases.
    Pettalia J; Pozzulo JD; Reed J
    Child Abuse Negl; 2017 Jul; 69():1-9. PubMed ID: 28415027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of Male Defendants' Attractiveness and Trustworthiness on Simulated Judicial Decisions in Two Different Swindles.
    Yang Q; Zhu B; Zhang Q; Wang Y; Hu R; Liu S; Sun D
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2160. PubMed ID: 31616349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rape Perpetrators on Trial: The Effect of Sexual Assault-Related Schemas on Attributions of Blame.
    Stuart SM; McKimmie BM; Masser BM
    J Interpers Violence; 2019 Jan; 34(2):310-336. PubMed ID: 27026408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An offer you cannot refuse: Plea offer size affects innocent but not guilty defendants' perceptions of voluntariness.
    Fessinger MB; Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Dec; 47(6):619-633. PubMed ID: 38127547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Keep your bias to yourself: How deliberating with differently biased others affects mock-jurors' guilt decisions, perceptions of the defendant, memories, and evidence interpretation.
    Ruva CL; Guenther CC
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Oct; 41(5):478-493. PubMed ID: 28714733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. When emotionality trumps reason: a study of individual processing style and juror bias.
    Gunnell JJ; Ceci SJ
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(6):850-77. PubMed ID: 20583074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. When Hurt Heroes Do Harm: Collective Guilt and Leniency toward War-Veteran Defendants with PTSD.
    Jay ACV; Salerno JM; Ross RC
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2018; 25(1):32-58. PubMed ID: 31984005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can jurors be biased in their evaluation of third-party evidence within cases of rape?
    Parsons A; Mojtahedi D
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2022; 85():101837. PubMed ID: 36122514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.