These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37998248)

  • 41. Measurement-Device-Independent Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution.
    Yin HL; Fu Y
    Sci Rep; 2019 Feb; 9(1):3045. PubMed ID: 30816262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Quantum Key Distribution: Modeling and Simulation through BB84 Protocol Using Python3.
    Adu-Kyere A; Nigussie E; Isoaho J
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Aug; 22(16):. PubMed ID: 36016045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Sending-or-Not-Sending Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution with a Passive Decoy-State Method.
    Xue K; Shen Z; Zhao S; Mao Q
    Entropy (Basel); 2022 May; 24(5):. PubMed ID: 35626547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution with leaky sources.
    Wang W; Tamaki K; Curty M
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):1678. PubMed ID: 33462254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Performance of underwater quantum key distribution with polarization encoding.
    Zhao SC; Han XH; Xiao Y; Shen Y; Gu YJ; Li WD
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2019 May; 36(5):883-892. PubMed ID: 31045017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Secure polarization-independent subcarrier quantum key distribution in optical fiber channel using BB84 protocol with a strong reference.
    Gleim AV; Egorov VI; Nazarov YV; Smirnov SV; Chistyakov VV; Bannik OI; Anisimov AA; Kynev SM; Ivanova AE; Collins RJ; Kozlov SA; Buller GS
    Opt Express; 2016 Feb; 24(3):2619-33. PubMed ID: 26906834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Experimental measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution.
    Liu Y; Chen TY; Wang LJ; Liang H; Shentu GL; Wang J; Cui K; Yin HL; Liu NL; Li L; Ma X; Pelc JS; Fejer MM; Peng CZ; Zhang Q; Pan JW
    Phys Rev Lett; 2013 Sep; 111(13):130502. PubMed ID: 24116758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. State preparation robust to modulation signal degradation by use of a dual parallel modulator for high-speed BB84 quantum key distribution systems.
    Zhang W; Kadosawa Y; Tomita A; Ogawa K; Okamoto A
    Opt Express; 2020 Apr; 28(9):13965-13977. PubMed ID: 32403861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Performance analysis for OFDM-based multi-carrier continuous-variable quantum key distribution with an arbitrary modulation protocol.
    Wang H; Pan Y; Shao Y; Pi Y; Ye T; Li Y; Zhang T; Liu J; Yang J; Ma L; Huang W; Xu B
    Opt Express; 2023 Feb; 31(4):5577-5592. PubMed ID: 36823834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Phase-Matching Quantum Key Distribution with Discrete Phase Randomization.
    Zhang X; Wang Y; Jiang M; Lu Y; Li H; Zhou C; Bao W
    Entropy (Basel); 2021 Apr; 23(5):. PubMed ID: 33922572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Experimental quantum key distribution with uncharacterized sources and projective measurements.
    Zhu JR; Wu WZ; Ji L; Zhang CM; Wang Q
    Opt Lett; 2019 Dec; 44(23):5703-5706. PubMed ID: 31774758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Finite-key security analyses on passive decoy-state QKD protocols with different unstable sources.
    Song TT; Qin SJ; Wen QY; Wang YK; Jia HY
    Sci Rep; 2015 Oct; 5():15276. PubMed ID: 26471947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Finite-Key Analysis for Quantum Key Distribution with Discrete-Phase Randomization.
    Wang RQ; Yin ZQ; Jin XH; Wang R; Wang S; Chen W; Guo GC; Han ZF
    Entropy (Basel); 2023 Jan; 25(2):. PubMed ID: 36832625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Fully Passive Quantum Key Distribution.
    Wang W; Wang R; Hu C; Zapatero V; Qian L; Qi B; Curty M; Lo HK
    Phys Rev Lett; 2023 Jun; 130(22):220801. PubMed ID: 37327415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effects of experimental impairments on the security of continuous-variable quantum key distribution.
    Ruiz-Chamorro A; Cano D; Garcia-Callejo A; Fernandez V
    Heliyon; 2023 Jun; 9(6):e16670. PubMed ID: 37303546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Finite-key bound for semi-device-independent quantum key distribution.
    Zhou C; Xu P; Bao WS; Wang Y; Zhang Y; Jiang MS; Li HW
    Opt Express; 2017 Jul; 25(15):16971-16980. PubMed ID: 28789196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Chip-based quantum key distribution.
    Sibson P; Erven C; Godfrey M; Miki S; Yamashita T; Fujiwara M; Sasaki M; Terai H; Tanner MG; Natarajan CM; Hadfield RH; O'Brien JL; Thompson MG
    Nat Commun; 2017 Feb; 8():13984. PubMed ID: 28181489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Qubit-Based Clock Synchronization for QKD Systems Using a Bayesian Approach.
    Cochran RD; Gauthier DJ
    Entropy (Basel); 2021 Jul; 23(8):. PubMed ID: 34441128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Efficient room-temperature molecular single-photon sources for quantum key distribution.
    Murtaza G; Colautti M; Hilke M; Lombardi P; Cataliotti FS; Zavatta A; Bacco D; Toninelli C
    Opt Express; 2023 Mar; 31(6):9437-9447. PubMed ID: 37157515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Bases selection with pseudo-random functions in BB84 scheme.
    Dervisevic E; Voznak M; Mehic M
    Heliyon; 2024 Jan; 10(1):e23578. PubMed ID: 38173502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.