These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

444 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37999555)

  • 1. Insights in Pharmaceutical Pollution: The Prospective Role of eDNA Metabarcoding.
    Papaioannou C; Geladakis G; Kommata V; Batargias C; Lagoumintzis G
    Toxics; 2023 Nov; 11(11):. PubMed ID: 37999555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Environmental DNA metabarcoding for benthic monitoring: A review of sediment sampling and DNA extraction methods.
    Pawlowski J; Bruce K; Panksep K; Aguirre FI; Amalfitano S; Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil L; Baussant T; Bouchez A; Carugati L; Cermakova K; Cordier T; Corinaldesi C; Costa FO; Danovaro R; Dell'Anno A; Duarte S; Eisendle U; Ferrari BJD; Frontalini F; Frühe L; Haegerbaeumer A; Kisand V; Krolicka A; Lanzén A; Leese F; Lejzerowicz F; Lyautey E; Maček I; Sagova-Marečková M; Pearman JK; Pochon X; Stoeck T; Vivien R; Weigand A; Fazi S
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Apr; 818():151783. PubMed ID: 34801504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.
    Landrigan PJ; Raps H; Cropper M; Bald C; Brunner M; Canonizado EM; Charles D; Chiles TC; Donohue MJ; Enck J; Fenichel P; Fleming LE; Ferrier-Pages C; Fordham R; Gozt A; Griffin C; Hahn ME; Haryanto B; Hixson R; Ianelli H; James BD; Kumar P; Laborde A; Law KL; Martin K; Mu J; Mulders Y; Mustapha A; Niu J; Pahl S; Park Y; Pedrotti ML; Pitt JA; Ruchirawat M; Seewoo BJ; Spring M; Stegeman JJ; Suk W; Symeonides C; Takada H; Thompson RC; Vicini A; Wang Z; Whitman E; Wirth D; Wolff M; Yousuf AK; Dunlop S
    Ann Glob Health; 2023; 89(1):23. PubMed ID: 36969097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Environmental RNA outperforms eDNA metabarcoding in assessing impact of marine pollution: A chromium-spiked mesocosm test.
    Greco M; Lejzerowicz F; Reo E; Caruso A; Maccotta A; Coccioni R; Pawlowski J; Frontalini F
    Chemosphere; 2022 Jul; 298():134239. PubMed ID: 35292278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modeling the ecological status response of rivers to multiple stressors using machine learning: A comparison of environmental DNA metabarcoding and morphological data.
    Fan J; Wang S; Li H; Yan Z; Zhang Y; Zheng X; Wang P
    Water Res; 2020 Sep; 183():116004. PubMed ID: 32622231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Application of Environmental DNA Metabarcoding for Predicting Anthropogenic Pollution in Rivers.
    Li F; Peng Y; Fang W; Altermatt F; Xie Y; Yang J; Zhang X
    Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Oct; 52(20):11708-11719. PubMed ID: 30211550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of environmental DNA and bulk-sample metabarcoding using highly degenerate cytochrome c oxidase I primers.
    Macher JN; Vivancos A; Piggott JJ; Centeno FC; Matthaei CD; Leese F
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2018 Nov; 18(6):1456-1468. PubMed ID: 30129704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sources, pathways, and relative risks of contaminants in surface water and groundwater: a perspective prepared for the Walkerton inquiry.
    Ritter L; Solomon K; Sibley P; Hall K; Keen P; Mattu G; Linton B
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2002 Jan; 65(1):1-142. PubMed ID: 11809004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. eDNA metabarcoding in zooplankton improves the ecological status assessment of aquatic ecosystems.
    Yang J; Zhang X
    Environ Int; 2020 Jan; 134():105230. PubMed ID: 31704569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Environmental DNA metabarcoding studies are critically affected by substrate selection.
    Koziol A; Stat M; Simpson T; Jarman S; DiBattista JD; Harvey ES; Marnane M; McDonald J; Bunce M
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Mar; 19(2):366-376. PubMed ID: 30485662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Environmental DNA metabarcoding: Transforming how we survey animal and plant communities.
    Deiner K; Bik HM; Mächler E; Seymour M; Lacoursière-Roussel A; Altermatt F; Creer S; Bista I; Lodge DM; de Vere N; Pfrender ME; Bernatchez L
    Mol Ecol; 2017 Nov; 26(21):5872-5895. PubMed ID: 28921802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multi-marker eDNA metabarcoding survey to assess the environmental impact of three offshore gas platforms in the North Adriatic Sea (Italy).
    Cordier T; Frontalini F; Cermakova K; Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil L; Treglia M; Scantamburlo E; Bonamin V; Pawlowski J
    Mar Environ Res; 2019 Apr; 146():24-34. PubMed ID: 30890270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ecosystem biomonitoring with eDNA: metabarcoding across the tree of life in a tropical marine environment.
    Stat M; Huggett MJ; Bernasconi R; DiBattista JD; Berry TE; Newman SJ; Harvey ES; Bunce M
    Sci Rep; 2017 Sep; 7(1):12240. PubMed ID: 28947818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Aquatic environmental DNA: A review of the macro-organismal biomonitoring revolution.
    Takahashi M; Saccò M; Kestel JH; Nester G; Campbell MA; van der Heyde M; Heydenrych MJ; Juszkiewicz DJ; Nevill P; Dawkins KL; Bessey C; Fernandes K; Miller H; Power M; Mousavi-Derazmahalleh M; Newton JP; White NE; Richards ZT; Allentoft ME
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 May; 873():162322. PubMed ID: 36801404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. eDNA metabarcoding revealed differential structures of aquatic communities in a dynamic freshwater ecosystem shaped by habitat heterogeneity.
    Xie R; Zhao G; Yang J; Wang Z; Xu Y; Zhang X; Wang Z
    Environ Res; 2021 Oct; 201():111602. PubMed ID: 34214559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of stream macroinvertebrate communities with eDNA is not congruent with tissue-based metabarcoding.
    Gleason JE; Elbrecht V; Braukmann TWA; Hanner RH; Cottenie K
    Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3239-3251. PubMed ID: 32799390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of benthic invertebrate diversity and river ecological status along an urbanized gradient using environmental DNA metabarcoding and a traditional survey method.
    Ji F; Han D; Yan L; Yan S; Zha J; Shen J
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Feb; 806(Pt 2):150587. PubMed ID: 34582852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. eDNA metabarcoding as a promising conservation tool for monitoring fish diversity in a coastal wetland of the Pearl River Estuary compared to bottom trawling.
    Zou K; Chen J; Ruan H; Li Z; Guo W; Li M; Liu L
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Feb; 702():134704. PubMed ID: 31726353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A manager's guide to using eDNA metabarcoding in marine ecosystems.
    Gold Z; Wall AR; Schweizer TM; Pentcheff ND; Curd EE; Barber PH; Meyer RS; Wayne R; Stolzenbach K; Prickett K; Luedy J; Wetzer R
    PeerJ; 2022; 10():e14071. PubMed ID: 36405018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Environmental DNA metabarcoding for fish community analysis in backwater lakes: A comparison of capture methods.
    Fujii K; Doi H; Matsuoka S; Nagano M; Sato H; Yamanaka H
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210357. PubMed ID: 30703107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.