122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38000160)
21. A mixed DNA profile controversy revisited.
Kalafut T; Pugh S; Gill P; Abbas S; Semaan M; Mansour I; Curran J; Bright JA; Hicks T; Wivell R; Buckleton J
J Forensic Sci; 2022 Jan; 67(1):128-135. PubMed ID: 34651300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Internal validation of STRmix™ - A multi laboratory response to PCAST.
Bright JA; Richards R; Kruijver M; Kelly H; McGovern C; Magee A; McWhorter A; Ciecko A; Peck B; Baumgartner C; Buettner C; McWilliams S; McKenna C; Gallacher C; Mallinder B; Wright D; Johnson D; Catella D; Lien E; O'Connor C; Duncan G; Bundy J; Echard J; Lowe J; Stewart J; Corrado K; Gentile S; Kaplan M; Hassler M; McDonald N; Hulme P; Oefelein RH; Montpetit S; Strong M; Noël S; Malsom S; Myers S; Welti S; Moretti T; McMahon T; Grill T; Kalafut T; Greer-Ritzheimer M; Beamer V; Taylor DA; Buckleton JS
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 May; 34():11-24. PubMed ID: 29367014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Application of a probabilistic genotyping software to MPS mixture STR data is supported by similar trends in LRs compared with CE data.
Benschop CCG; van der Gaag KJ; de Vreede J; Backx AJ; de Leeuw RH; Zuñiga S; Hoogenboom J; de Knijff P; Sijen T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102489. PubMed ID: 33677249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparing multiple POI to DNA mixtures.
Hicks T; Kerr Z; Pugh S; Bright JA; Curran J; Taylor D; Buckleton J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102481. PubMed ID: 33607394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Compound and Conditioned Likelihood Ratio Behavior within a Probabilistic Genotyping Context.
Duke K; Cuenca D; Myers S; Wallin J
Genes (Basel); 2022 Nov; 13(11):. PubMed ID: 36360267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. An assessment of the information content of likelihood ratios derived from complex mixtures.
Marsden CD; Rudin N; Inman K; Lohmueller KE
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():64-72. PubMed ID: 26851613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Analysis of mixed DNA profiles from the RapidHIT™ ID platform using probabilistic genotyping software STRmix™.
Ward D; Henry J; Taylor D
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 May; 58():102664. PubMed ID: 35091215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. MaSTR™: an effective probabilistic genotyping tool for interpretation of STR mixtures associated with differentially degraded DNA.
Holland MM; Tiedge TM; Bender AJ; Gaston-Sanchez SA; McElhoe JA
Int J Legal Med; 2022 Mar; 136(2):433-446. PubMed ID: 35092470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Investigation into the prevalence of background DNA on flooring within houses and its transfer to a contacting surface.
Reither JB; Gray E; Durdle A; Conlan XA; van Oorschot RAH; Szkuta B
Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Jan; 318():110563. PubMed ID: 33168422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Systematic evaluation of STRmix™ performance on degraded DNA profile data.
Duke KR; Myers SP
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jan; 44():102174. PubMed ID: 31707114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Developmental validation of STRmix™, expert software for the interpretation of forensic DNA profiles.
Bright JA; Taylor D; McGovern C; Cooper S; Russell L; Abarno D; Buckleton J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Jul; 23():226-239. PubMed ID: 27235797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Internal Validation of MaSTR™ Probabilistic Genotyping Software for the Interpretation of 2-5 Person Mixed DNA Profiles.
Adamowicz MS; Rambo TN; Clarke JL
Genes (Basel); 2022 Aug; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 36011340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Uncertainty in probabilistic genotyping of low template DNA: A case study comparing STRMix™ and TrueAllele™.
Thompson WC
J Forensic Sci; 2023 May; 68(3):1049-1063. PubMed ID: 36847295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A comparison of likelihood ratios with and without assuming relatedness for DNA mixtures interpreted using a continuous model.
Kruijver M; Bright JA
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Jan; 62():102800. PubMed ID: 36372011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Probabilistic approaches to interpreting two-person DNA mixtures from post-coital specimens.
Rodriguez JJRB; Bright JA; Salvador JM; Laude RP; De Ungria MCA
Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Jul; 300():157-163. PubMed ID: 31112838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The interpretation of mixed DNA profiles from a mother, father, and child trio.
Lin MH; Bright JA; Pugh SN; Buckleton JS
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jan; 44():102175. PubMed ID: 31644964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. DNA mixture genotyping by probabilistic computer interpretation of binomially-sampled laser captured cell populations: combining quantitative data for greater identification information.
Ballantyne J; Hanson EK; Perlin MW
Sci Justice; 2013 Jun; 53(2):103-14. PubMed ID: 23601717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Addressing uncertain assumptions in DNA evidence evaluation.
Kruijver M; Kelly H; Taylor D; Buckleton J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Sep; 66():102913. PubMed ID: 37453205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The efficacy of DNA mixture to mixture matching.
Bright JA; Taylor D; Kerr Z; Buckleton J; Kruijver M
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jul; 41():64-71. PubMed ID: 30986620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The Probabilistic Genotyping Software STRmix: Utility and Evidence for its Validity.
Buckleton JS; Bright JA; Gittelson S; Moretti TR; Onorato AJ; Bieber FR; Budowle B; Taylor DA
J Forensic Sci; 2019 Mar; 64(2):393-405. PubMed ID: 30132900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
