These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38000160)

  • 41. Validating TrueAllele
    Bauer DW; Butt N; Hornyak JM; Perlin MW
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Mar; 65(2):380-398. PubMed ID: 31580496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Guiding proposition setting in forensic DNA interpretation.
    Buckleton J; Kalafut T; Curran J
    Sci Justice; 2022 Sep; 62(5):540-546. PubMed ID: 36336447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Probabilistic genotyping software: An overview.
    Coble MD; Bright JA
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jan; 38():219-224. PubMed ID: 30458407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Evaluating DNA Mixtures with Contributors from Different Populations Using Probabilistic Genotyping.
    Kruijver M; Kelly H; Bright JA; Buckleton J
    Genes (Basel); 2022 Dec; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 36672780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Are low LRs reliable?
    Buckleton JS; Pugh SN; Bright JA; Taylor DA; Curran JM; Kruijver M; Gill P; Budowle B; Cheng K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Nov; 49():102350. PubMed ID: 32979624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Single-cell investigative genetics: Single-cell data produces genotype distributions concentrated at the true genotype across all mixture complexities.
    Grgicak CM; Bhembe Q; Slooten K; Sheth NC; Duffy KR; Lun DS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2024 Mar; 69():103000. PubMed ID: 38199167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. STRmix
    Noël S; Noël J; Granger D; Lefebvre JF; Séguin D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jul; 41():24-31. PubMed ID: 30947115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Four model variants within a continuous forensic DNA mixture interpretation framework: Effects on evidential inference and reporting.
    Swaminathan H; Qureshi MO; Grgicak CM; Duffy K; Lun DS
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0207599. PubMed ID: 30458020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Developmental validation of STRmix™ NGS, a probabilistic genotyping tool for the interpretation of autosomal STRs from forensic profiles generated using NGS.
    Cheng K; Bright JA; Kelly H; Liu YY; Lin MH; Kruijver M; Taylor D; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Jan; 62():102804. PubMed ID: 36370677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Exploring tapelifts as a method for dual workflow STR amplification.
    Martin B; Taylor D; Linacre A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Mar; 57():102653. PubMed ID: 34920191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Inter-sample contamination detection using mixture deconvolution comparison.
    Taylor D; Rowe E; Kruijver M; Abarno D; Bright JA; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 May; 40():160-167. PubMed ID: 30851600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Validation of Probabilistic Genotyping Software for Single Cell STR Analysis.
    Huffman K; Ballantyne J
    Genes (Basel); 2023 Mar; 14(3):. PubMed ID: 36980945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Direct PCR amplification of forensic touch and other challenging DNA samples: A review.
    Cavanaugh SE; Bathrick AS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Jan; 32():40-49. PubMed ID: 29059581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Validation of a top-down DNA profile analysis for database searching using a fully continuous probabilistic genotyping model.
    Taylor D; Bright JA; Scandrett L; Abarno D; Lee SI; Wivell R; Kelly H; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102479. PubMed ID: 33588348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A novel computational strategy to predict the value of the evidence in the SNP-based forensic mixtures.
    Pascali VL
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0247344. PubMed ID: 34653182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Examining performance and likelihood ratios for two likelihood ratio systems using the PROVEDIt dataset.
    Riman S; Iyer H; Vallone PM
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0256714. PubMed ID: 34534241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Evaluation of samples comprising minute amounts of DNA.
    Benschop CC; Haned H; Yoo SY; Sijen T
    Sci Justice; 2015 Sep; 55(5):316-22. PubMed ID: 26385713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparative analysis of two Rapid DNA technologies for the processing of blood and saliva-based samples.
    Laurin N; Boulianne H; Frégeau C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Nov; 67():102928. PubMed ID: 37573630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Probabilistic interpretation of the Amelogenin locus.
    Bright JA; Buckleton J; Taylor D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102462. PubMed ID: 33465757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. TrueAllele(®) Genotype Identification on DNA Mixtures Containing up to Five Unknown Contributors.
    Perlin MW; Hornyak JM; Sugimoto G; Miller KW
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jul; 60(4):857-68. PubMed ID: 26189920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.