213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38000671)
1. Information Quality and Readability: ChatGPT's Responses to the Most Common Questions About Spinal Cord Injury.
Temel MH; Erden Y; Bağcıer F
World Neurosurg; 2024 Jan; 181():e1138-e1144. PubMed ID: 38000671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Artificial intelligence insights into osteoporosis: assessing ChatGPT's information quality and readability.
Erden Y; Temel MH; Bağcıer F
Arch Osteoporos; 2024 Mar; 19(1):17. PubMed ID: 38499716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of information accuracy and clarity: ChatGPT responses to the most frequently asked questions about premature ejaculation.
Şahin MF; Keleş A; Özcan R; Doğan Ç; Topkaç EC; Akgül M; Yazıci CM
Sex Med; 2024 Jun; 12(3):qfae036. PubMed ID: 38832125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating the accuracy and readability of ChatGPT in providing parental guidance for adenoidectomy, tonsillectomy, and ventilation tube insertion surgery.
Polat E; Polat YB; Senturk E; Dogan R; Yenigun A; Tugrul S; Eren SB; Aksoy F; Ozturan O
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Jun; 181():111998. PubMed ID: 38830271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Examination of the reliability and readability of Chatbot Generative Pretrained Transformer's (ChatGPT) responses to questions about orthodontics and the evolution of these responses in an updated version.
Kılınç DD; Mansız D
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2024 May; 165(5):546-555. PubMed ID: 38300168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bridging the Gap Between Urological Research and Patient Understanding: The Role of Large Language Models in Automated Generation of Layperson's Summaries.
Eppler MB; Ganjavi C; Knudsen JE; Davis RJ; Ayo-Ajibola O; Desai A; Storino Ramacciotti L; Chen A; De Castro Abreu A; Desai MM; Gill IS; Cacciamani GE
Urol Pract; 2023 Sep; 10(5):436-443. PubMed ID: 37410015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the reliability and readability of ChatGPT-4 responses regarding hypothyroidism during pregnancy.
Onder CE; Koc G; Gokbulut P; Taskaldiran I; Kuskonmaz SM
Sci Rep; 2024 Jan; 14(1):243. PubMed ID: 38167988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A quality and readability comparison of artificial intelligence and popular health website education materials for common hand surgery procedures.
Pohl NB; Derector E; Rivlin M; Bachoura A; Tosti R; Kachooei AR; Beredjiklian PK; Fletcher DJ
Hand Surg Rehabil; 2024 Jun; 43(3):101723. PubMed ID: 38782361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dr. Google to Dr. ChatGPT: assessing the content and quality of artificial intelligence-generated medical information on appendicitis.
Ghanem YK; Rouhi AD; Al-Houssan A; Saleh Z; Moccia MC; Joshi H; Dumon KR; Hong Y; Spitz F; Joshi AR; Kwiatt M
Surg Endosc; 2024 May; 38(5):2887-2893. PubMed ID: 38443499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Enhancing Readability of Online Patient-Facing Content: The Role of AI Chatbots in Improving Cancer Information Accessibility.
Abreu AA; Murimwa GZ; Farah E; Stewart JW; Zhang L; Rodriguez J; Sweetenham J; Zeh HJ; Wang SC; Polanco PM
J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2024 May; 22(2D):. PubMed ID: 38749478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.
Huang G; Fang CH; Agarwal N; Bhagat N; Eloy JA; Langer PD
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 133(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 25654639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of the quality, accuracy, and readability of patient information on polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) on the internet available in English: a cross-sectional study.
Vågenes H; Pranić SM
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2023 May; 21(1):44. PubMed ID: 37189154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Readability Levels of Dental Patient Education Brochures.
Boles CD; Liu Y; November-Rider D
J Dent Hyg; 2016 Feb; 90(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 26896514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. AI-Generated Information for Vascular Patients: Assessing the Standard of Procedure-Specific Information Provided by the ChatGPT AI-Language Model.
Haidar O; Jaques A; McCaughran PW; Metcalfe MJ
Cureus; 2023 Nov; 15(11):e49764. PubMed ID: 38046759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Readability of AAOS Patient Education Materials: Evaluating the Progress Since 2008.
Roberts H; Zhang D; Dyer GS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Sep; 98(17):e70. PubMed ID: 27605695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The readability of informed consent forms for research studies conducted in South Africa.
Fischer AE; Venter WDF; Collins S; Carman M; Lalla-Edward ST
S Afr Med J; 2021 Feb; 111(2):180-183. PubMed ID: 33944731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A readability assessment of online stroke information.
Sharma N; Tridimas A; Fitzsimmons PR
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2014 Jul; 23(6):1362-7. PubMed ID: 24389374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The quality, understandability, readability, and popularity of online educational materials for heart murmur.
Arslan D; Sami Tutar M; Kozanhan B; Bagci Z
Cardiol Young; 2020 Mar; 30(3):328-336. PubMed ID: 31875800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Empowering inclusivity: improving readability of living kidney donation information with ChatGPT.
Garcia Valencia OA; Thongprayoon C; Miao J; Suppadungsuk S; Krisanapan P; Craici IM; Jadlowiec CC; Mao SA; Mao MA; Leeaphorn N; Budhiraja P; Cheungpasitporn W
Front Digit Health; 2024; 6():1366967. PubMed ID: 38659656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality of information and appropriateness of ChatGPT outputs for urology patients.
Cocci A; Pezzoli M; Lo Re M; Russo GI; Asmundo MG; Fode M; Cacciamani G; Cimino S; Minervini A; Durukan E
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2024 Mar; 27(1):103-108. PubMed ID: 37516804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
