These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38000731)
1. Early outcomes after first reverse total shoulder arthroplasty better prognosticate contralateral success compared with early outcomes after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Hao KA; Bindi VE; Turnbull LM; Wright JO; Wright TW; Farmer KW; Vasilopoulos T; Struk AM; Schoch BS; King JJ J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Jun; 33(6):1331-1339. PubMed ID: 38000731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does achieving clinically important thresholds after first shoulder arthroplasty predict similar outcomes of the contralateral shoulder? Turnbull LM; Hao KA; Srinivasan RC; Wright JO; Wright TW; Farmer KW; Vasilopoulos T; Struk AM; Schoch BS; King JJ J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Apr; 33(4):880-887. PubMed ID: 37690587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Anatomic versus reverse total shoulder arthroplasty outcomes after prior contralateral anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with bilateral primary osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff. Turnbull LM; Hao KA; Bindi VE; Wright JO; Wright TW; Farmer KW; Vasilopoulos T; Struk AM; Schoch BS; King JJ Int Orthop; 2024 Mar; 48(3):801-807. PubMed ID: 38032497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognostic value of the Walch classification for patients before and after shoulder arthroplasty performed for osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff. Simovitch RW; Hao KA; Elwell J; Antuna S; Flurin PH; Wright TW; Schoch BS; Roche CP; Ehrlich ZA; Colasanti C; Zuckerman JD J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Jan; 33(1):108-120. PubMed ID: 37778653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stratification of the minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptomatic state after total shoulder arthroplasty by implant type, preoperative diagnosis, and sex. Simovitch RW; Elwell J; Colasanti CA; Hao KA; Friedman RJ; Flurin PH; Wright TW; Schoch BS; Roche CP; Zuckerman JD J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Sep; 33(9):e492-e506. PubMed ID: 38461936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantifying success after first revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: the minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptomatic state. Hao KA; Hones KM; O'Keefe DS; Saengchote SA; Burns MQ; Wright JO; Wright TW; Farmer KW; Struk AM; Simovitch RW; Schoch BS; King JJ J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Oct; 32(10):e516-e527. PubMed ID: 37178967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. What Is the Accuracy of Three Different Machine Learning Techniques to Predict Clinical Outcomes After Shoulder Arthroplasty? Kumar V; Roche C; Overman S; Simovitch R; Flurin PH; Wright T; Zuckerman J; Routman H; Teredesai A Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Oct; 478(10):2351-2363. PubMed ID: 32332242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of body mass index in survivorship and clinical outcomes in total shoulder arthroplasty. Katayama ES; Durisek GR; Bustamante GC; Barry LW; Wilson S; Barnett JS; Borin M; Stevens A; Patel AV; Bishop JY; Cvetanovich GL; Rauck RC J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Sep; 33(9):1980-1989. PubMed ID: 38423249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of cervical spine pathology on outcomes after total shoulder arthroplasty. Colasanti CA; Lin CC; Simovitch RW; Virk MS; Zuckerman JD J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Mar; 32(3):e117-e128. PubMed ID: 36179961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of body mass index on internal rotation and function following anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Eichinger JK; Rao MV; Lin JJ; Goodloe JB; Kothandaraman V; Barfield WR; Parada SA; Roche C; Friedman RJ J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Feb; 30(2):265-272. PubMed ID: 32619658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Comparison and Correlation of Clinical Outcome Metrics in Anatomic and Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. Flurin PH; Roche CP; Wright TW; Marczuk Y; Zuckerman JD Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2015 Dec; 73 Suppl 1():S118-23. PubMed ID: 26631207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantifying success after total shoulder arthroplasty: the minimal clinically important difference. Simovitch R; Flurin PH; Wright T; Zuckerman JD; Roche CP J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Feb; 27(2):298-305. PubMed ID: 29162305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patients undergoing anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty achieve clinically significant outcomes faster than those undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Drager J; Polce EM; Fu M; Nemsick M; Huddleston HP; Forsythe B; Nicholson GP; Cole BJ; Verma NN; Garrigues GE J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Nov; 30(11):2523-2532. PubMed ID: 33711501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of clinical outcomes of revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for failed primary anatomic vs. reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Hao KA; Boschert EN; O'Keefe DS; Saengchote SA; Schoch BS; Wright JO; Wright TW; Farmer KW; Struk AM; King JJ JSES Int; 2023 Mar; 7(2):257-263. PubMed ID: 36911771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Salvage reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for failed anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a cohort analysis. Otte RS; Naylor AJ; Blanchard KN; Cancienne JM; Chan W; Romeo AA; Garrigues GE; Nicholson GP J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Jul; 29(7S):S134-S138. PubMed ID: 32643607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantifying success after first revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: the minimal and substantial clinically important percentage of maximal possible improvement. Hao KA; Hones KM; O'Keefe DS; Saengchote SA; Turnbull LM; Wright JO; Wright TW; Farmer KW; Struk AM; Simovitch RW; Schoch BS; King JJ J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Mar; 33(3):593-603. PubMed ID: 37778654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical outcomes of anatomic vs. reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in primary osteoarthritis with preoperative rotational stiffness and an intact rotator cuff: a case control study. Hao KA; Greene AT; Werthel JD; Wright JO; King JJ; Wright TW; Vasilopoulos T; Schoch BS J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Jul; 32(7):e355-e365. PubMed ID: 36737034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty yields similar results to anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of humeral head avascular necrosis. McLaughlin R; Tams C; Werthel JD; Wright TW; Crowe MM; Aibinder W; Friedman RJ; King JJ; Schoch BS J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Jun; 31(6S):S94-S102. PubMed ID: 34968689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Two-year clinical outcomes and complication rates in anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty implanted with Exactech GPS intraoperative navigation. Youderian AR; Greene AT; Polakovic SV; Davis NZ; Parsons M; Papandrea RF; Jones RB; Byram IR; Gobbato BB; Wright TW; Flurin PH; Zuckerman JD J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Dec; 32(12):2519-2532. PubMed ID: 37348780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Reverse and Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients With an Intact Rotator Cuff and No Previous Surgery. Friedman RJ; Schoch BS; Eichinger JK; Neel GB; Boettcher ML; Flurin PH; Wright TW; Zuckerman JD; Roche C J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2022 Oct; 30(19):941-948. PubMed ID: 36135928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]