BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38000958)

  • 1. Dosimetric comparison of stereotactic MR-guided radiation therapy (SMART) and HDR brachytherapy boost in cervical cancer.
    Dincer N; Ugurluer G; Mustafayev TZ; Serkizyan A; Aydin G; Güngör G; Yapici B; Atalar B; Özyar E
    Brachytherapy; 2024; 23(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 38000958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiobiological optimization comparison between pulse-dose-rate and high-dose-rate brachytherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Annede P; Dumas I; Schernberg A; Tailleur A; Fumagalli I; Bockel S; Mignot F; Kissel M; Deutsch E; Haie-Meder C; Chargari C
    Brachytherapy; 2019; 18(3):370-377. PubMed ID: 30797698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Boost modalities in cervical cancer: dosimetric comparison between intracavitary BT vs. intracavitary + interstitial BT vs. SBRT.
    Benkhaled S; Diakité K; Jullian N; Poeta S; Vandekerkhove C; Van Houtte P; Van Gestel D; De Caluwé A
    Radiat Oncol; 2023 Jun; 18(1):105. PubMed ID: 37381016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Proof of principle: Applicator-guided stereotactic IMRT boost in combination with 3D MRI-based brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Assenholt MS; Vestergaard A; Kallehauge JF; Mohamed S; Nielsen SK; Petersen JB; Fokdal L; Lindegaard JC; Tanderup K
    Brachytherapy; 2014; 13(4):361-8. PubMed ID: 24656732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of HDR brachytherapy-replicating prostate radiotherapy planning for tomotherapy, cyberknife and VMAT.
    de Chavez R; Grogan G; Hug B; Howe K; Grigg A; Waterhouse D; Lane J; Glyde A; Brown E; Bydder S; Pryor D; Hargrave C; Charles PH; Hellyer J; Ebert MA
    Med Dosim; 2022 Spring; 47(1):61-69. PubMed ID: 34551879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A dose planning study on applicator guided stereotactic IMRT boost in combination with 3D MRI based brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Assenholt MS; Petersen JB; Nielsen SK; Lindegaard JC; Tanderup K
    Acta Oncol; 2008; 47(7):1337-43. PubMed ID: 18663651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Deformable image registration-based contour propagation yields clinically acceptable plans for MRI-based cervical cancer brachytherapy planning.
    Chapman CH; Polan D; Vineberg K; Jolly S; Maturen KE; Brock KK; Prisciandaro JI
    Brachytherapy; 2018; 17(2):360-367. PubMed ID: 29331573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Practically achievable maximum high-risk clinical target volume doses in MRI-guided intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: a planning study.
    Menon G; Huang F; Sloboda R; Pearcey R; Ghosh S
    Brachytherapy; 2014; 13(6):572-8. PubMed ID: 25085455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Boost with the CyberKnife for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Dosimetric Analysis and Potential Clinical Benefits.
    Gao J; Xu B; Lin Y; Xu Z; Huang M; Li X; Wu X; Chen Y
    Cancers (Basel); 2022 Oct; 14(20):. PubMed ID: 36291951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A dosimetric comparison of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and High Dose Rate (HDR) brachytherapy in localized cervical cancer radiotherapy.
    Wali L; Helal A; Darwesh R; Attar M
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2019; 27(3):473-483. PubMed ID: 30958322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of dosimetric parameters in the treatment planning of magnetic resonance imaging-based intracavitary image-guided adaptive brachytherapy with and without optimization using the central shielding technique.
    Nishikawa R; Yoshida K; Ebina Y; Omoteda M; Miyawaki D; Ishihara T; Ejima Y; Akasaka H; Satoh H; Kyotani K; Takahashi S; Sasaki R
    J Radiat Res; 2018 May; 59(3):316-326. PubMed ID: 29518234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A novel two-step optimization method for tandem and ovoid high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Sharma M; Fields EC; Todor DA
    Brachytherapy; 2015; 14(5):613-8. PubMed ID: 26092424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A feasibility study of using advanced external beam techniques to create a vaginal cuff brachytherapy-like endometrial boost plan.
    Grelewicz Z; Zerrusen B; Sathiaseelan V; Zhang H
    Med Dosim; 2018 Spring; 43(1):30-38. PubMed ID: 28886961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adaptive image guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer: a combined MRI-/CT-planning technique with MRI only at first fraction.
    Nesvacil N; Pötter R; Sturdza A; Hegazy N; Federico M; Kirisits C
    Radiother Oncol; 2013 Apr; 107(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 23068712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dosimetric comparison of high-dose-rate brachytherapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy as a boost to the prostate.
    Hermesse J; Biver S; Jansen N; Lenaerts E; Nickers P
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Jan; 76(1):269-76. PubMed ID: 19775833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Point A vs. HR-CTV D
    Harmon G; Diak A; Shea SM; Yacoub JH; Small W; Harkenrider MM
    Brachytherapy; 2016; 15(6):825-831. PubMed ID: 27693173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 45 or 50 Gy, Which is the Optimal Radiotherapy Pelvic Dose in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer in the Perspective of Reaching Magnetic Resonance Image-guided Adaptive Brachytherapy Planning Aims?
    Mazeron R; Petit C; Rivin E; Limkin E; Dumas I; Maroun P; Annede P; Martinetti F; Seisen T; Lefkopoulos D; Chargari C; Haie-Meder C
    Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2016 Mar; 28(3):171-7. PubMed ID: 26547694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dynamics of High Risk Clinical Target Volume reduction during Brachytherapy and impact on its coverage in patients with inoperable cervical cancer.
    Pobijakova M; Scepanovic D; Paluga M; Fekete M; Mardiak J
    Neoplasma; 2018 Mar; 65(3):425-430. PubMed ID: 29788726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long term experience with 3D image guided brachytherapy and clinical outcome in cervical cancer patients.
    Ribeiro I; Janssen H; De Brabandere M; Nulens A; De Bal D; Vergote I; Van Limbergen E
    Radiother Oncol; 2016 Sep; 120(3):447-454. PubMed ID: 27157510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the Dosimetric Influence of Applicator Displacement on 2D and 3D Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer Treatment.
    Wu A; Tang D; Wu A; Liu Y; Qian L; Zhu L
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2021; 20():15330338211041201. PubMed ID: 34569371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.