BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38001506)

  • 21. Evaluation of Adjunctive Ultrasonography for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women Aged 40-49 Years With Varying Breast Density Undergoing Screening Mammography: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Harada-Shoji N; Suzuki A; Ishida T; Zheng YF; Narikawa-Shiono Y; Sato-Tadano A; Ohta R; Ohuchi N
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Aug; 4(8):e2121505. PubMed ID: 34406400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Protocol for a phase III pragmatic stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening and guidelines with, versus without, implementation strategies for improving pain in adults with cancer attending outpatient oncology and palliative care services: the Stop Cancer PAIN trial.
    Luckett T; Phillips J; Agar M; Lam L; Davidson PM; McCaffrey N; Boyle F; Shaw T; Currow DC; Read A; Hosie A; Lovell M
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Jul; 18(1):558. PubMed ID: 30012122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of Integrating Machine Learning Mortality Estimates With Behavioral Nudges to Clinicians on Serious Illness Conversations Among Patients With Cancer: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Manz CR; Parikh RB; Small DS; Evans CN; Chivers C; Regli SH; Hanson CW; Bekelman JE; Rareshide CAL; O'Connor N; Schuchter LM; Shulman LN; Patel MS
    JAMA Oncol; 2020 Dec; 6(12):e204759. PubMed ID: 33057696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Behavioral and psychological impact of returning breast density results to Latinas: study protocol for a randomized clinical trial.
    Patel BK; Ridgeway JL; Ghosh K; Rhodes DJ; Borah B; Jenkins S; Suman VJ; Norman A; Jewett M; Singh D; Vachon CM; Radecki Breitkopf C
    Trials; 2019 Dec; 20(1):744. PubMed ID: 31852492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Effect of California's Breast Density Notification Legislation on Breast Cancer Screening.
    Chau SL; Alabaster A; Luikart K; Brenman LM; Habel LA
    J Prim Care Community Health; 2017 Apr; 8(2):55-62. PubMed ID: 27799412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening.
    Comstock CE; Gatsonis C; Newstead GM; Snyder BS; Gareen IF; Bergin JT; Rahbar H; Sung JS; Jacobs C; Harvey JA; Nicholson MH; Ward RC; Holt J; Prather A; Miller KD; Schnall MD; Kuhl CK
    JAMA; 2020 Feb; 323(8):746-756. PubMed ID: 32096852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Supporting breast cancer screening decisions for caregivers of older women with dementia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Fowler NR; Schonberg MA; Sachs GA; Schwartz PH; Gao S; Lane KA; Inger L; Torke AM
    Trials; 2018 Dec; 19(1):678. PubMed ID: 30541634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.
    Deckert A; Anders S; de Allegri M; Nguyen HT; Souares A; McMahon S; Boerner K; Meurer M; Herbst K; Sand M; Koeppel L; Siems T; Brugnara L; Brenner S; Burk R; Lou D; Kirrmaier D; Duan Y; Ovchinnikova S; Marx M; Kräusslich HG; Knop M; Bärnighausen T; Denkinger C
    Trials; 2021 Jan; 22(1):39. PubMed ID: 33419461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Family cascade screening for equitable identification of familial hypercholesterolemia: study protocol for a hybrid effectiveness-implementation type III randomized controlled trial.
    Johnson C; Chen J; McGowan MP; Tricou E; Card M; Pettit AR; Klaiman T; Rader DJ; Volpp KG; Beidas RS
    Implement Sci; 2024 Apr; 19(1):30. PubMed ID: 38594685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
    Melnikow J; Fenton JJ; Whitlock EP; Miglioretti DL; Weyrich MS; Thompson JH; Shah K
    Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):268-78. PubMed ID: 26757021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cost-Effectiveness of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Screening for Women With Extremely Dense Breast Tissue.
    Geuzinge HA; Bakker MF; Heijnsdijk EAM; van Ravesteyn NT; Veldhuis WB; Pijnappel RM; de Lange SV; Emaus MJ; Mann RM; Monninkhof EM; de Koekkoek-Doll PK; van Gils CH; de Koning HJ;
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2021 Nov; 113(11):1476-1483. PubMed ID: 34585249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cancer detection rate of breast-MR in supplemental screening after negative mammography in women with dense breasts. Preliminary results of the MA-DETECT-Study after 200 participants.
    Kaiser C; Wilhelm T; Walter S; Singer S; Keller E; Baltzer PAT
    Eur J Radiol; 2024 Jul; 176():111476. PubMed ID: 38710116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Breast density implications and supplemental screening.
    Vourtsis A; Berg WA
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Apr; 29(4):1762-1777. PubMed ID: 30255244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A non-randomized controlled stepped wedge trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a multi-level mammography intervention in improving appointment adherence in underserved women.
    Highfield L; Rajan SS; Valerio MA; Walton G; Fernandez ME; Bartholomew LK
    Implement Sci; 2015 Oct; 10():143. PubMed ID: 26464110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cost-effectiveness of abbreviated-protocol MRI screening for women with mammographically dense breasts in a national breast cancer screening program.
    Wang J; Greuter MJW; Vermeulen KM; Brokken FB; Dorrius MD; Lu W; de Bock GH
    Breast; 2022 Feb; 61():58-65. PubMed ID: 34915447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of supplemental ultrasonography screening for women with dense breasts.
    Sprague BL; Stout NK; Schechter C; van Ravesteyn NT; Cevik M; Alagoz O; Lee CI; van den Broek JJ; Miglioretti DL; Mandelblatt JS; de Koning HJ; Kerlikowske K; Lehman CD; Tosteson AN
    Ann Intern Med; 2015 Feb; 162(3):157-66. PubMed ID: 25486550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Rationale and design of the Novel Uses of adaptive Designs to Guide provider Engagement in Electronic Health Records (NUDGE-EHR) pragmatic adaptive randomized trial: a trial protocol.
    Lauffenburger JC; Isaac T; Trippa L; Keller P; Robertson T; Glynn RJ; Sequist TD; Kim DH; Fontanet CP; Castonguay EWB; Haff N; Barlev RA; Mahesri M; Gopalakrishnan C; Choudhry NK
    Implement Sci; 2021 Jan; 16(1):9. PubMed ID: 33413494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening in Women with Dense Breasts and Negative Mammography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Hussein H; Abbas E; Keshavarzi S; Fazelzad R; Bukhanov K; Kulkarni S; Au F; Ghai S; Alabousi A; Freitas V
    Radiology; 2023 Mar; 306(3):e221785. PubMed ID: 36719288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Using Behavioral Economics to Reduce Low-Value Care Among Older Adults: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Kullgren JT; Kim HM; Slowey M; Colbert J; Soyster B; Winston SA; Ryan K; Forman JH; Riba M; Krupka E; Kerr EA
    JAMA Intern Med; 2024 Mar; 184(3):281-290. PubMed ID: 38285565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.