These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38004086)

  • 21. Do digital impressions have a greater accuracy for full-arch implant-supported reconstructions compared to conventional impressions? An
    Shaikh M; Lakha T; Kheur S; Qamri B; Kheur M
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2022; 22(4):398-404. PubMed ID: 36511075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Atraumatic intraoral scans and virtual hybrid casts for custom implant abutments and zirconia implants: Accuracy of the workflow.
    Schubert O; Edelhoff D; Schweiger J; Güth JF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jun; 129(6):920-929. PubMed ID: 34598772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of splinting scan bodies on trueness of complete-arch implant impression using different intraoral scanners: an in vitro study.
    Retana L; Nejat AH; Pozzi A
    Int J Comput Dent; 2023 Feb; 26(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 35072425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accuracy of computer-assisted template-based implant placement using conventional impression and scan model or intraoral digital impression: A randomised controlled trial with 1 year of follow-up.
    Tallarico M; Xhanari E; Kim YJ; Cocchi F; Martinolli M; Alushi A; Baldoni EE; Meloni SM
    Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2019; 12(2):197-206. PubMed ID: 31090750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Accuracy of three intraoral scans for primary impressions of edentulous jaws].
    Cao Y; Chen JK; Deng KH; Wang Y; Sun YC; Zhao YJ
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Feb; 52(1):129-137. PubMed ID: 32071476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accuracy of impressions for multiple implants: A comparative study of digital and conventional techniques.
    Lyu M; Di P; Lin Y; Jiang X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1017-1023. PubMed ID: 33640093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Accuracy of different digital scanning techniques and scan bodies for complete-arch implant-supported prostheses.
    Mizumoto RM; Yilmaz B; McGlumphy EA; Seidt J; Johnston WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 31040026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Accuracy of photogrammetry, intraoral scanning, and conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation: an in vitro comparative study.
    Ma B; Yue X; Sun Y; Peng L; Geng W
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Dec; 21(1):636. PubMed ID: 34893053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Accuracy of a chairside intraoral scanner compared with a laboratory scanner for the completely edentulous maxilla: An in vitro 3-dimensional comparative analysis.
    Zarone F; Ruggiero G; Ferrari M; Mangano F; Joda T; Sorrentino R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):761.e1-761.e7. PubMed ID: 33289647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A novel post-processing strategy to improve the accuracy of complete-arch intraoral scanning for implants: an in vitro study.
    Pan Y; Dai X; Wan F; Song C; Tsoi JK; Pow EH
    J Dent; 2023 Dec; 139():104761. PubMed ID: 37879557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Understanding the effect of scan spans on the accuracy of intraoral and desktop scanners.
    Chen Y; Zhai Z; Watanabe S; Nakano T; Ishigaki S
    J Dent; 2022 Sep; 124():104220. PubMed ID: 35817227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of complete-arch implant scanning with 5 different intraoral scanners in terms of trueness and operator experience.
    Revell G; Simon B; Mennito A; Evans ZP; Renne W; Ludlow M; Vág J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):632-638. PubMed ID: 33832761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influence of ambient light conditions on the accuracy and scanning time of seven intraoral scanners in complete-arch implant scans.
    Ochoa-López G; Cascos R; Antonaya-Martín JL; Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M
    J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104138. PubMed ID: 35461973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison between stereophotogrammetric, digital, and conventional impression techniques in implant-supported fixed complete arch prostheses: An in vitro study.
    Tohme H; Lawand G; Chmielewska M; Makhzoume J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Feb; 129(2):354-362. PubMed ID: 34112521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Accuracy between intraoral and extraoral scanning: Three-dimensional deviation and effect of distance between implants from two scanning methods.
    Pereira ALC; Segundo HVM; Júnior LCA; Germano AR; Carreiro ADFP
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2022; 22(3):279-287. PubMed ID: 36511059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accuracy of single implant scans with a combined healing abutment-scan body system and different intraoral scanners: An in vitro study.
    Çakmak G; Donmez MB; Atalay S; Yilmaz H; Kökat AM; Yilmaz B
    J Dent; 2021 Oct; 113():103773. PubMed ID: 34384842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Accuracy of implant impression techniques with a scannable healing abutment.
    Jung HT; Kim HY; Song SY; Park JH; Lee JY
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):729-734. PubMed ID: 33832762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of intraoral scanner and fixed partial denture situation on the scan accuracy of multiple implants: An in vitro study.
    Donmez MB; Mathey A; Gäumann F; Mathey A; Yilmaz B; Abou-Ayash S
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Jun; 25(3):502-510. PubMed ID: 36762495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Superimposition of intraoral scans of an edentulous arch with implants and implant-supported provisional restoration, implementing a novel implant prosthetic scan body.
    Ntovas P; Spanopoulou M; Martin W; Sykaras N
    J Prosthodont Res; 2023 Jul; 67(3):475-480. PubMed ID: 36244761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of scan powder and scanning technology on measured deviations of complete-arch implant supported frameworks digitized with industrial and intraoral scanners.
    Donmez MB; Çakmak G; Dede DÖ; Küçükekenci AS; Lu WE; Schumacher FL; Revilla-León M; Yilmaz B
    J Dent; 2023 Nov; 138():104736. PubMed ID: 37802291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.