These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38005577)

  • 1. Utility of Spectral Filtering to Improve the Reliability of Marine Fauna Detections from Drone-Based Monitoring.
    Colefax AP; Walsh AJ; Purcell CR; Butcher P
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Nov; 23(22):. PubMed ID: 38005577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Drone images afford more detections of marine wildlife than real-time observers during simultaneous large-scale surveys.
    Hodgson AJ; Kelly N; Peel D
    PeerJ; 2023; 11():e16186. PubMed ID: 37941930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors Affecting Shark Detection from Drone Patrols in Southeast Queensland, Eastern Australia.
    Mitchell JD; Scott-Holland TB; Butcher PA
    Biology (Basel); 2022 Oct; 11(11):. PubMed ID: 36358255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Operational use of multispectral images for macro-litter mapping and categorization by Unmanned Aerial Vehicle.
    Gonçalves G; Andriolo U
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2022 Mar; 176():113431. PubMed ID: 35158175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) with thermal infrared (TIR) sensors are effective for monitoring and counting threatened Vietnamese primates.
    Gazagne E; Gray RJ; Ratajszczak R; Brotcorne F; Hambuckers A
    Primates; 2023 Jul; 64(4):407-413. PubMed ID: 37140752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Protecting endangered megafauna through AI analysis of drone images in a low-connectivity setting: a case study from Namibia.
    Hua A; Martin K; Shen Y; Chen N; Mou C; Sterk M; Reinhard B; Reinhard FF; Lee S; Alibhai S; Jewell ZC
    PeerJ; 2022; 10():e13779. PubMed ID: 35942123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An Investigation of the Reliability of Different Types of Sensors in the Real-Time Vibration-Based Anomaly Inspection in Drone.
    Ghazali MHM; Rahiman W
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Aug; 22(16):. PubMed ID: 36015774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating new technology for biodiversity monitoring: Are drone surveys biased?
    Corcoran E; Denman S; Hamilton G
    Ecol Evol; 2021 Jun; 11(11):6649-6656. PubMed ID: 34141247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Who's better at spotting? A comparison between aerial photography and observer-based methods to monitor floating marine litter and marine mega-fauna.
    Garcia-Garin O; Aguilar A; Borrell A; Gozalbes P; Lobo A; Penadés-Suay J; Raga JA; Revuelta O; Serrano M; Vighi M
    Environ Pollut; 2020 Mar; 258():113680. PubMed ID: 31796317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance of Two Different Flight Configurations for Drone-Borne Magnetic Data.
    Accomando F; Vitale A; Bonfante A; Buonanno M; Florio G
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Aug; 21(17):. PubMed ID: 34502628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Beach litter survey by drones: Mini-review and discussion of a potential standardization.
    Gonçalves G; Andriolo U; Gonçalves LMS; Sobral P; Bessa F
    Environ Pollut; 2022 Dec; 315():120370. PubMed ID: 36216177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The emergence of marine recreational drone fishing: Regional trends and emerging concerns.
    Winkler AC; Butler EC; Attwood CG; Mann BQ; Potts WM
    Ambio; 2022 Mar; 51(3):638-651. PubMed ID: 34145559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A pilot study to estimate the population size of endangered Galápagos marine iguanas using drones.
    Varela-Jaramillo A; Rivas-Torres G; Guayasamin JM; Steinfartz S; MacLeod A
    Front Zool; 2023 Jan; 20(1):4. PubMed ID: 36703215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Understanding through drone image analysis the interactions between geomorphology, vegetation and marine debris along a sandy spit.
    Corbau C; Buoninsegni J; Olivo E; Vaccaro C; Nardin W; Simeoni U
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2023 Feb; 187():114515. PubMed ID: 36580840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. UAV-based RGB and TIR imaging for geothermal monitoring: a case study at Kestanbol geothermal field, Northwestern Turkey.
    Yucel MA; Sanliyuksel Yucel D
    Environ Monit Assess; 2023 Apr; 195(5):541. PubMed ID: 37017799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A colonial-nesting seabird shows no heart-rate response to drone-based population surveys.
    Geldart EA; Barnas AF; Semeniuk CAD; Gilchrist HG; Harris CM; Love OP
    Sci Rep; 2022 Nov; 12(1):18804. PubMed ID: 36335150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Drone Detection and Classification Using Physical-Layer Protocol Statistical Fingerprint.
    Morge-Rollet L; Le Jeune D; Le Roy F; Canaff C; Gautier R
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Sep; 22(17):. PubMed ID: 36081160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of drone and vessel-based collection of microbiological water samples in marine environments.
    Horricks RA; Bannister C; Lewis-McCrea LM; Hicks J; Watson K; Reid GK
    Environ Monit Assess; 2022 May; 194(6):439. PubMed ID: 35593922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Unmanned aerial vehicles for surveying marine fauna: assessing detection probability.
    Hodgson A; Peel D; Kelly N
    Ecol Appl; 2017 Jun; 27(4):1253-1267. PubMed ID: 28178755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fusion Filters between the No Motion No Integration Technique and Kalman Filter in Noise Optimization on a 6DoF Drone for Orientation Tracking.
    Hoang ML; Carratù M; Paciello V; Pietrosanto A
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jun; 23(12):. PubMed ID: 37420768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.