195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38007857)
1. Potential role of
Aggarwal P; Singh H; Das CK; Mavuduru RS; Kakkar N; Lal A; Gorsi U; Kumar R; Mittal BR
Eur J Radiol; 2024 Jan; 170():111218. PubMed ID: 38007857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3.
Parghane RV; Basu S
J Nucl Med Technol; 2023 Sep; 51(3):261-262. PubMed ID: 36041875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [
Lin R; Wang C; Chen S; Lin T; Cai H; Chen S; Yang Y; Zhang J; Xu F; Zhang J; Chen X; Zang J; Miao W
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2024 Jan; 51(2):535-547. PubMed ID: 37728667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Utility of
Siva S; Callahan J; Pryor D; Martin J; Lawrentschuk N; Hofman MS
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2017 Jun; 61(3):372-378. PubMed ID: 28116853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Special issue "The advance of solid tumor research in China": 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for evaluating primary and metastatic lesions in different histological subtypes of renal cell carcinoma.
Li Y; Zheng R; Zhang Y; Huang C; Tian L; Liu R; Liu Y; Zhang Z; Han H; Zhou F; He L; Dong P
Int J Cancer; 2023 Jan; 152(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 35751420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Head-to-head comparisons of enhanced CT, 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in identifying adverse pathology of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma: a prospective study.
Chen SH; Lin BH; Chen SM; Qiu QR; Ruan ZT; Chen ZJ; Wei Y; Zheng QS; Xue XY; Miao WB; Xu N
Int Braz J Urol; 2023; 49(6):716-731. PubMed ID: 37624658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical utility of FDG PET/CT for primary and recurrent papillary renal cell carcinoma.
Hou G; Zhao D; Jiang Y; Zhu Z; Huo L; Li F; Cheng W
Cancer Imaging; 2021 Feb; 21(1):25. PubMed ID: 33632314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The roles of 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT and 18 F-FDG PET/CT imaging in patients with triple-negative breast cancer and the association of tissue PSMA and claudin 1, 4, and 7 levels with PET findings.
Arslan E; Ergül N; Beyhan E; Erol Fenercioglu Ö; Sahin R; Cin M; Battal Havare S; Can Trabulus FD; Mermut Ö; Akbas S; Fikret Çermik T
Nucl Med Commun; 2023 Apr; 44(4):284-290. PubMed ID: 36756767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Exploratory analysis of 64 CuCl 2 PET-CT imaging in carcinoma prostate and its comparison with 68 Ga-PSMA-11 and 18 F-FDG PET-CT.
Nazar AK; Kalshetty A; Chakravarty R; Chakraborty S; Basu S
Nucl Med Commun; 2023 Oct; 44(10):910-923. PubMed ID: 37578310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inconsistent Detection of Sites of Metastatic Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma with PSMA-Targeted [
Yin Y; Campbell SP; Markowski MC; Pierorazio PM; Pomper MG; Allaf ME; Rowe SP; Gorin MA
Mol Imaging Biol; 2019 Jun; 21(3):567-573. PubMed ID: 30218388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A pilot study of [68Ga]Ga-fibroblast activation protein inhibitor-04 PET/CT in renal cell carcinoma.
Guo C; Liu Y; Yang H; Xia Y; Li X; Chen L; Feng Y; Zhang Y; Chen Y; Huang Z
Br J Radiol; 2024 Mar; 97(1156):859-867. PubMed ID: 38290775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The use of
Raveenthiran S; Esler R; Yaxley J; Kyle S
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Oct; 46(11):2280-2288. PubMed ID: 31332498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14.
Qi Z; Yao X; Su M; Huang R
Hell J Nucl Med; 2023; 26(2):155-156. PubMed ID: 37527052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How accurate is
Erdem S; Simsek DH; Degirmenci E; Aydin R; Bagbudar S; Ozluk Y; Sanli Y; Sanli O; Ozcan F
Urol Oncol; 2022 Jan; 40(1):6.e1-6.e9. PubMed ID: 34400066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of dual tracer PSMA and FDG PET/CT in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) compared to conventional imaging: A multi-institutional case series with intra-individual comparison.
Tariq A; Kwok M; Pearce A; Rhee H; Kyle S; Marsh P; Raveenthiran S; Wong D; McBean R; Westera J; Dunglison N; Esler R; Navaratnam A; Yaxley JW; Thomas P; Pattison DA; Roberts MJ
Urol Oncol; 2022 Feb; 40(2):66.e1-66.e9. PubMed ID: 34895817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical utility of
Nakamoto Y; Ishimori T; Shimizu Y; Sano K; Togashi K
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Jul; 46(7):1524-1530. PubMed ID: 30847538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18.
von Eyben FE; Picchio M; von Eyben R; Rhee H; Bauman G
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Sep; 4(5):686-693. PubMed ID: 28753806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of [
Civan C; Kuyumcu S; Has Simsek D; Sanli O; Isik EG; Ozkan ZG; Hurdogan O; Sanli Y
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2024 Feb; 51(3):852-861. PubMed ID: 37803246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Head-to-head comparison of [
Wang G; Li L; Wang J; Zang J; Chen J; Xiao Y; Fan X; Zhu L; Kung HF; Zhu Z
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Apr; 50(5):1499-1509. PubMed ID: 36600099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
