These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38008645)

  • 1. Correlation Between Contrast-Detail Analysis and Clinical Image Quality Assessment of Intrapulmonary Lesions in Dual-Energy Subtraction Chest Radiography Using the Two-Shot Method: A Phantom Study.
    Kuramoto T; Takarabe S; Kanzaki Y; Shibayama Y; Yamasaki Y; Kitamura Y
    Acad Radiol; 2024 May; 31(5):2118-2127. PubMed ID: 38008645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lung nodule detection by microdose CT versus chest radiography (standard and dual-energy subtracted).
    Ebner L; Bütikofer Y; Ott D; Huber A; Landau J; Roos JE; Heverhagen JT; Christe A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Apr; 204(4):727-35. PubMed ID: 25794062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of chest dual-energy subtraction digital tomosynthesis and dual-energy subtraction radiography for detection of pulmonary nodules: initial evaluations in human clinical cases.
    Gomi T; Nozaki M; Takeda T; Umeda T; Takahashi K; Nakajima M
    Acad Radiol; 2013 Nov; 20(11):1357-63. PubMed ID: 24119347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correlation of contrast-detail analysis and clinical image quality assessment in chest radiography with a human cadaver study.
    De Crop A; Bacher K; Van Hoof T; Smeets PV; Smet BS; Vergauwen M; Kiendys U; Duyck P; Verstraete K; D'Herde K; Thierens H
    Radiology; 2012 Jan; 262(1):298-304. PubMed ID: 22056687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of dual-energy subtraction chest radiography on detection of small pulmonary nodules with varying attenuation: receiver operating characteristic analysis using a phantom study.
    Oda S; Awai K; Funama Y; Utsunomiya D; Yanaga Y; Kawanaka K; Yamashita Y
    Jpn J Radiol; 2010 Apr; 28(3):214-9. PubMed ID: 20437132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of high- and low-energy entrance surface dose allocation ratio for two-shot dual-energy subtraction imaging on low-contrast resolution.
    Kanzaki Y; Kuramoto T; Takarabe S; Shibayama Y; Yoshikawa H; Kato T
    Radiography (Lond); 2023 Jan; 29(1):240-246. PubMed ID: 36608378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of chest dual-energy subtraction digital tomosynthesis imaging and dual-energy subtraction radiography to detect simulated pulmonary nodules with and without calcifications a phantom study.
    Gomi T; Nakajima M; Fujiwara H; Umeda T
    Acad Radiol; 2011 Feb; 18(2):191-6. PubMed ID: 21232683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improved detection of pulmonary nodules on energy-subtracted chest radiographs with a commercial computer-aided diagnosis software: comparison with human observers.
    Szucs-Farkas Z; Patak MA; Yuksel-Hatz S; Ruder T; Vock P
    Eur Radiol; 2010 Jun; 20(6):1289-96. PubMed ID: 19936752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of pulmonary nodules with dual-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography.
    Uemura M; Miyagawa M; Yasuhara Y; Murakami T; Ikura H; Sakamoto K; Tagashira H; Arakawa K; Mochizuki T
    Radiat Med; 2005 Sep; 23(6):391-7. PubMed ID: 16389980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of dual-energy subtraction and electronic bone suppression combined with computer-aided detection on chest radiographs: effect on human observers' performance in nodule detection.
    Szucs-Farkas Z; Schick A; Cullmann JL; Ebner L; Megyeri B; Vock P; Christe A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 May; 200(5):1006-13. PubMed ID: 23617482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relationship Between Tube Voltage and Physical Image Quality of Pulmonary Nodules on Chest Radiographs Obtained Using the Bone-Suppression Technique.
    Takagi S; Yaegashi T; Ishikawa M
    Acad Radiol; 2019 Jul; 26(7):e174-e179. PubMed ID: 30269955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The advantage of digital tomosynthesis for pulmonary nodule detection concerning influence of nodule location and size: a phantom study.
    Kim EY; Bista AB; Kim T; Park SY; Park KJ; Kang DK; Sun JS
    Clin Radiol; 2017 Sep; 72(9):796.e1-796.e8. PubMed ID: 28454640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection of simulated pulmonary nodules by single-exposure dual-energy computed radiography of the chest: effect of a computer-aided diagnosis system (Part 2).
    Kido S; Kuriyama K; Kuroda C; Nakamura H; Ito W; Shimura K; Kato H
    Eur J Radiol; 2002 Dec; 44(3):205-9. PubMed ID: 12468069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Small lung cancers: improved detection by use of bone suppression imaging--comparison with dual-energy subtraction chest radiography.
    Li F; Engelmann R; Pesce LL; Doi K; Metz CE; Macmahon H
    Radiology; 2011 Dec; 261(3):937-49. PubMed ID: 21946054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relationship between the visual evaluation of pathology visibility and the physical measure of low contrast detail detectability in neonatal chest radiography.
    Al-Murshedi S; Benhalim M; Alzyoud K; Papathanasiou S; England A
    Radiography (Lond); 2022 Nov; 28(4):1116-1121. PubMed ID: 36099681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An investigation into the validity of utilising the CDRAD 2.0 phantom for optimisation studies in digital radiography.
    Al-Murshedi S; Hogg P; England A
    Br J Radiol; 2018 Sep; 91(1089):20180317. PubMed ID: 29906239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dual energy subtraction digital radiography improves performance of a next generation computer-aided detection program.
    Balkman JD; Mehandru S; DuPont E; Novak RD; Gilkeson RC
    J Thorac Imaging; 2010 Feb; 25(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 20160602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection of small pulmonary nodules on chest radiographs: efficacy of dual-energy subtraction technique using flat-panel detector chest radiography.
    Oda S; Awai K; Funama Y; Utsunomiya D; Yanaga Y; Kawanaka K; Nakaura T; Hirai T; Murakami R; Nomori H; Yamashita Y
    Clin Radiol; 2010 Aug; 65(8):609-15. PubMed ID: 20599062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlation between physical measurements and observer evaluations of image quality in digital chest radiography.
    Yalcin A; Olgar T; Sancak T; Atac GK; Akyar S
    Med Phys; 2020 Sep; 47(9):3935-3944. PubMed ID: 32427360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Value of bone suppression software in chest radiographs for improving image quality and reducing radiation dose.
    Hong GS; Do KH; Son AY; Jo KW; Kim KP; Yun J; Lee CW
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Jul; 31(7):5160-5171. PubMed ID: 33439320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.