These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38008875)

  • 1. Condylar volume and positional changes following a bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy in skeletal class II and III malocclusions.
    Park C; Kim H; Ryu J; Jung S; Park HJ; Oh HK; Kook MS
    Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Nov; 45(1):41. PubMed ID: 38008875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Three-dimensional changes in condylar position in skeletal class Ⅲ patients with mandibular deviation after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy].
    Huang JQ; Huang Z; Wu J; Wang YJ; Sang T; Liu F; Zheng Y
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Oct; 54(10):649-655. PubMed ID: 31606999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Changes in Condylar Position Within 12 Months After Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy With and Without Le Fort I Osteotomy by Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.
    Han Y
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Jan; 80(1):162-173. PubMed ID: 34547267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Effect of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy on temporomandibular joint symptom and condylar position in patients with skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion by cone beam computed tomography].
    Guo ML; Huang Z; Wang C; Wang YJ
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Oct; 38(5):519-524. PubMed ID: 33085235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Short- and long-term changes of condylar position after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular advancement in combination with Le Fort I osteotomy evaluated by cone-beam computed tomography.
    Chen S; Lei J; Wang X; Fu KY; Farzad P; Yi B
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(11):1956-66. PubMed ID: 23973047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Effect of segmental Le Fort I osteotomy and bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy on the condyle position in skeletal class III malocclusion patients].
    He W; Xie XY; Wang X; Wang XX; Fu KY; Li ZL
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2015 Oct; 47(5):829-33. PubMed ID: 26474625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the Mandibular Condyle Morphologic Relation before and after Orthognathic Surgery in Class II and III Malocclusion Patients Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
    Roman R; Almășan O; Hedeșiu M; Băciuț M; Bran S; Popa D; Ban A; Dinu C
    Biology (Basel); 2022 Sep; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 36138832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationship between occlusal force and condylar morphology in class II and III after bi-maxillary osteotomy.
    Ueki K; Yoshizawa K; Moroi A; Tsutsui T; Hotta A; Hiraide R; Takayama A; Tsunoda T; Saito Y; Sato M; Baba N
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Dec; 46(12):2103-2107. PubMed ID: 30420148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional quantitative changes of condyle in patients with skeletal class III malocclusion after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery with 5-year follow-up.
    Wang Z; Shi Y; Wang Y; Chen W; Jiang H; Cheng J
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jul; 27(7):4061-4071. PubMed ID: 37145152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantitative assessment of condyle positional changes before and after orthognathic surgery based on fused 3D images from cone beam computed tomography.
    Ma RH; Li G; Yin S; Sun Y; Li ZL; Ma XC
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Aug; 24(8):2663-2672. PubMed ID: 31728734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Positional changes of the mandibular condyle in unilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy combined with intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for asymmetric class III malocclusion.
    Park J; Hong KE; Yun JE; Shin ES; Kim CH; Kim BJ; Kim JH
    J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Oct; 47(5):373-381. PubMed ID: 34713812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of Condylar Positional, Structural, and Volumetric Status in Class III Orthognathic Surgery Patients.
    Podčernina J; Urtāne I; Pirttiniemi P; Šalms Ģ; Radziņš O; Aleksejūnienė J
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2020 Dec; 56(12):. PubMed ID: 33291272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Changes in cross-sectional measurements of masseter, medial pterygoid muscles, ramus, condyle and occlusal force after bi-maxillary surgery.
    Takayama A; Ueki K; Moroi A; Tsutsui T; Saito Y; Sato M; Yoshizawa K
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Mar; 47(3):400-405. PubMed ID: 30691943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of condylar surface CT values related to condylar height reduction after orthognathic surgery.
    Ueki K; Yoshizawa K; Saito Y; Takayama A; Baba N; Kimura Y; Koizumi M; Fujimoto K; Iguchi R; Sato M; Osada AH; Moroi A
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2021 Aug; 49(8):639-648. PubMed ID: 33994298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Changes in the position of the condyle after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy in patients with mandibular retrusion and protrusion: a new condyle: fossa matching concept.
    Yin Q; Bi R; Abotaleb B; Jiang N; Li Y; Zhu S
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Dec; 57(10):1086-1091. PubMed ID: 31623933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surgery-First and Orthodontic-First Approaches Produce Similar Patterns of Condylar Displacement and Remodeling in Patients With Skeletal Class III Malocclusion.
    He X; He J; Yuan H; Chen W; Jiang H; Cheng J
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Jul; 77(7):1446-1456. PubMed ID: 30853422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Changes of Temporomandibular Joint Morphology and Symptoms in Class II Malocclusion Patients With Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramous Osteotomy.
    Luo YX; Chen ZH; Wang JN
    J Craniofac Surg; 2023 Oct; 34(7):e655-e660. PubMed ID: 37801718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do patients treated with bimaxillary surgery have more stable condylar positions than those who have undergone single-jaw surgery?
    Kim YJ; Oh KM; Hong JS; Lee JH; Kim HM; Reyes M; Cevidanes LH; Park YH
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 70(9):2143-52. PubMed ID: 22115974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Condylar positioning changes following unilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy in patients with mandibular prognathism.
    Kim MI; Kim JH; Jung S; Park HJ; Oh HK; Ryu SY; Kook MS
    Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Dec; 37(1):36. PubMed ID: 26501042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-Dimensional Changes in the Mandibular Proximal Segment After Using a Surgery-First Approach in Patients With Class III Malocclusion and Facial Asymmetry.
    Kim M; Jha N; Choi JH; Kim YJ; Lee U; Cevidanes L; Choi JY; Baek SH
    J Craniofac Surg; 2022 Oct; 33(7):1956-1961. PubMed ID: 35175981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.