128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38009389)
1. Improving fluorescence confocal microscopy for margin assessment during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: The LaserSAFE technique.
Almeida-Magana R; Au M; Al-Hammouri T; Dinneen K; Haider A; Freeman A; Shaw G
BJU Int; 2024 Jun; 133(6):677-679. PubMed ID: 38009389
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Digital Frozen Sections with Fluorescence Confocal Microscopy During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Surgical Technique.
Rocco B; Sarchi L; Assumma S; Cimadamore A; Montironi R; Reggiani Bonetti L; Turri F; De Carne C; Puliatti S; Maiorana A; Pellacani G; Micali S; Bianchi G; Sighinolfi MC
Eur Urol; 2021 Dec; 80(6):724-729. PubMed ID: 33965288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Impact of Experience on the Risk of Surgical Margins and Biochemical Recurrence after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Learning Curve Study.
Bravi CA; Tin A; Vertosick E; Mazzone E; Martini A; Dell'Oglio P; Stabile A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Suardi N; Gallina A; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Vickers A
J Urol; 2019 Jul; 202(1):108-113. PubMed ID: 30747873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of Variations in Prostatic Apex Shape on Apical Margin Positive Rate After Radical Prostatectomy: Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy vs Open Radical Prostatectomy.
Yu YD; Lee M; Hong SK; Byun SS; Lee SE; Lee S
J Endourol; 2018 Jan; 32(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 29212368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prognostic differences among the positive surgical margin locations following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a large Japanese cohort (the MSUG94 group).
Sasaki T; Ebara S; Tatenuma T; Ikehata Y; Nakayama A; Kawase M; Toide M; Yoneda T; Sakaguchi K; Teishima J; Makiyama K; Kitamura H; Saito K; Koie T; Koga F; Urakami S; Inoue T
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2023 Apr; 53(5):443-451. PubMed ID: 36708227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Real-time assessment of surgical margins during radical prostatectomy: a novel approach that uses fluorescence confocal microscopy for the evaluation of peri-prostatic soft tissue.
Rocco B; Sighinolfi MC; Bertoni L; Spandri V; Puliatti S; Eissa A; Reggiani Bonetti L; Azzoni P; Sandri M; De Carne C; Turri F; Cimadamore A; Montironi R; Maiorana A; Micali S; Bianchi G; Pellacani G
BJU Int; 2020 Apr; 125(4):487-489. PubMed ID: 31971342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Is the learning curve of the urology resident for conventional radical prostatectomy similar to that of staff initiating robot-assisted radical prostatectomy?
Pires RDS; Pereira CWA; Favorito LA
Int Braz J Urol; 2024; 50(3):335-345. PubMed ID: 38446904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intraoperative Optical Biopsy during Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Using Confocal Endomicroscopy.
Lopez A; Zlatev DV; Mach KE; Bui D; Liu JJ; Rouse RV; Harris T; Leppert JT; Liao JC
J Urol; 2016 Apr; 195(4 Pt 1):1110-1117. PubMed ID: 26626214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Early outcomes of single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: lessons learned from the learning-curve experience.
Covas Moschovas M; Bhat S; Onol F; Rogers T; Patel V
BJU Int; 2021 Jan; 127(1):114-121. PubMed ID: 32623822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The significance of micro-lymphatic invasion and pathological Gleason score in prostate cancer patients with pathologically organ-confined disease and negative surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Hashimoto T; Nakashima J; Inoue R; Komori O; Yamaguchi Y; Kashima T; Satake N; Nakagami Y; Namiki K; Nagao T; Ohno Y
Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Feb; 25(2):377-383. PubMed ID: 31673831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is "extreme" bladder neck preservation in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy a safe procedure?
Dal Moro F; Zazzara M; Morlacco A; Gardiman MP; Costa G; Zattoni F
Urologia; 2020 Aug; 87(3):149-154. PubMed ID: 31964317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors affecting surgical margin positivity in robotic assisted radical prostatectomy.
Yuksel M; Karamık K; Anıl H; Islamoglu E; Ates M; Savas M
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2017 Mar; 89(1):71-74. PubMed ID: 28403595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What is the role of Neurosafe in robotic radical prostatectomy?
Goonewardene SS; Cahill D
J Robot Surg; 2019 Feb; 13(1):187-188. PubMed ID: 29748745
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Linear extent of positive surgical margin impacts biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a high-volume center.
Porcaro AB; Tafuri A; Sebben M; Amigoni N; Shakir A; Corsi P; Processali T; Pirozzi M; Rizzetto R; Bernasconi R; Cerrato C; Tiso L; Migliorini F; Novella G; Brunelli M; De Marco V; Siracusano S; Artibani W
J Robot Surg; 2020 Aug; 14(4):663-675. PubMed ID: 31893344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Functional Recovery, Oncologic Outcomes and Postoperative Complications after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: An Evidence-Based Analysis Comparing the Retzius Sparing and Standard Approaches.
Menon M; Dalela D; Jamil M; Diaz M; Tallman C; Abdollah F; Sood A; Lehtola L; Miller D; Jeong W
J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1210-1217. PubMed ID: 29225060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pitfalls of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a comparison of positive surgical margins between robotic and laparoscopic surgery.
Tozawa K; Yasui T; Umemoto Y; Mizuno K; Okada A; Kawai N; Takahashi S; Kohri K
Int J Urol; 2014 Oct; 21(10):976-9. PubMed ID: 24912809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Superior Biochemical Recurrence and Long-term Quality-of-life Outcomes Are Achievable with Robotic Radical Prostatectomy After a Long Learning Curve-Updated Analysis of a Prospective Single-surgeon Cohort of 2206 Consecutive Cases.
Thompson JE; Egger S; Böhm M; Siriwardana AR; Haynes AM; Matthews J; Scheltema MJ; Stricker PD
Eur Urol; 2018 May; 73(5):664-671. PubMed ID: 29273404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Positive Surgical Margins Rate of Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in a Contemporary, Unselected Cohort.
Bahouth Z; Laniado M; Fowler R; Charlesworth PJS
J Urol; 2022 Mar; 207(3):609-616. PubMed ID: 34694141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Review of optimal techniques for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Kasabwala K; Patel NA; Hu JC
Curr Opin Urol; 2018 Mar; 28(2):102-107. PubMed ID: 29300208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reality of nerve sparing and surgical margins in surgeons' early experience with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in Japan.
Tatsugami K; Yoshioka K; Shiroki R; Eto M; Yoshino Y; Tozawa K; Fukasawa S; Fujisawa M; Takenaka A; Nasu Y; Kashiwagi A; Gotoh M; Terachi T;
Int J Urol; 2017 Mar; 24(3):191-196. PubMed ID: 28122393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
