127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38009593)
1. Interval between balloon removal and oxytocin administration in cervical ripening with double-balloon in singleton pregnancies: An observational study.
Sánchez-Romero J; Ruiz-Boluda I; Juan-Pérez A; Pérez-Buendía J; Motos-Garrido M; Blanco-Carnero JE; Nieto-Díaz A
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2024 May; 165(2):778-785. PubMed ID: 38009593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cervical ripening balloon with and without oxytocin in multiparas: a randomized controlled trial.
Bauer AM; Lappen JR; Gecsi KS; Hackney DN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Sep; 219(3):294.e1-294.e6. PubMed ID: 29763609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Six compared with 12 hours of Foley balloon placement for labor induction in nulliparous women with unripe cervices: a randomized controlled trial.
Appadurai U; Gan F; Hong J; Hamdan M; Tan PC
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Nov; 5(11):101157. PubMed ID: 37722505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical dilation balloon combined with intravenous drip of oxytocin for induction of term labor: a multicenter clinical trial.
Wu X; Wang C; Li Y; Ouyang C; Liao J; Cai W; Zhong Y; Zhang J; Chen H
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Jan; 297(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 29043436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Six versus twelve hours of single-balloon catheter placement with oxytocin administration for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
Lassey SC; Haber HR; Kanbergs A; Robinson JN; Little SE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jun; 224(6):611.e1-611.e8. PubMed ID: 33771496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of two management options for labor induction following unsuccessful prostaglandin E2 ripening.
Gulersen M; DiSturco M; Krantz DA; Bornstein E
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 May; 35(9):1759-1763. PubMed ID: 32449419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Six vs 12 hours of Foley catheter balloon placement in the labor induction of multiparas with unfavorable cervixes: a randomized controlled trial.
Kamarudzman N; Omar SZ; Gan F; Hong J; Hamdan M; Tan PC
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Nov; 5(11):101142. PubMed ID: 37643690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of delivery outcomes in low-dose and high-dose oxytocin regimens for induction of labor following cervical ripening with a balloon catheter: A retrospective observational cohort study.
Kruit H; Nupponen I; Heinonen S; Rahkonen L
PLoS One; 2022; 17(4):e0267400. PubMed ID: 35452451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Double-balloon catheter compared to vaginal dinoprostone for cervical ripening in obese women at term].
Grange J; Dimet J; Vital M; Le Thuaut A; Ducarme G
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2017 Oct; 45(10):521-527. PubMed ID: 28757105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Double-Balloon Device for 6 Compared With 12 Hours for Cervical Ripening: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Bleicher I; Dikopoltsev E; Kadour-Ferro E; Sammour R; Gonen R; Sagi S; Eshel A; Nussam L; Vitner D
Obstet Gynecol; 2020 May; 135(5):1153-1160. PubMed ID: 32282603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Favorable Simplified Bishop Score after cervical ripening associated with decreased cesarean birth rate.
Lee DS; Tandel MD; Kwan L; Francoeur AA; Duong HL; Negi M
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2022 Mar; 4(2):100534. PubMed ID: 34808400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cervical ripening in prolonged pregnancies by silicone double balloon catheter versus vaginal dinoprostone slow release system: The MAGPOP randomised controlled trial.
Diguisto C; Le Gouge A; Arthuis C; Winer N; Parant O; Poncelet C; Chauleur C; Hannigsberg J; Ducarme G; Gallot D; Gabriel R; Desbriere R; Beucher G; Faraguet C; Isly H; Rozenberg P; Giraudeau B; Perrotin F;
PLoS Med; 2021 Feb; 18(2):e1003448. PubMed ID: 33571294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of the Foley catheter versus a double balloon cervical ripening catheter in pre-induction cervical ripening in postdate primigravidae.
Sayed Ahmed WA; Ibrahim ZM; Ashor OE; Mohamed ML; Ahmed MR; Elshahat AM
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1489-1494. PubMed ID: 27436681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Morbidity associated with the use of Foley balloon for cervical ripening in women with prior cesarean delivery.
Ralph JA; Leftwich HK; Leung K; Zaki MN; Della Torre M; Hibbard JU
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Oct; 35(20):3937-3942. PubMed ID: 33172318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Conventional versus modified application of COOK Cervical Ripening Balloon for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial.
Wen C; Liu X; Wang Y; Wang J
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Oct; 22(1):739. PubMed ID: 36184583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Balloon catheter vs oxytocin alone for induction of labor in women with a previous cesarean section: A randomized controlled trial.
Sarreau M; Isly H; Poulain P; Fontaine B; Morel O; Villemonteix P; Mares P; Mousty E; Godard A; Ragot S; Pierre F
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Feb; 99(2):259-266. PubMed ID: 31432510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A randomized trial of Foley balloon induction of labor trial in nulliparas (FIAT-N).
Connolly KA; Kohari KS; Rekawek P; Smilen BS; Miller MR; Moshier E; Factor SH; Stone JL; Bianco AT
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Sep; 215(3):392.e1-6. PubMed ID: 27018464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Safety and efficacy of double-balloon catheter for cervical ripening: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Zhao G; Song G; Liu J
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Sep; 22(1):688. PubMed ID: 36068489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Cervical ripening and labor induction: Evaluation of single balloon catheter compared to double balloon catheter and dinoprostone insert].
Pez V; Deruelle P; Kyheng M; Boyon C; Clouqueur E; Garabedian C
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2018; 46(7-8):570-574. PubMed ID: 29903553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Double-balloon catheter versus prostaglandin for cervical ripening to induce labor after previous cesarean delivery.
Korb D; Renard S; Morin C; Merviel P; Sibony O
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 Apr; 301(4):931-940. PubMed ID: 32140810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
