116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38010471)
1. Lost in translation: evaluating the readability of online patient information for neuroendocrine tumors.
Paschke A; Grewal US
Endocrine; 2024 Apr; 84(1):97-99. PubMed ID: 38010471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing the Accuracy and Readability of Online Health Information for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer.
Storino A; Castillo-Angeles M; Watkins AA; Vargas C; Mancias JD; Bullock A; Demirjian A; Moser AJ; Kent TS
JAMA Surg; 2016 Sep; 151(9):831-7. PubMed ID: 27144966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Critical analysis of the quality of internet resources for patients with varicose veins.
Yan Q; Field AR; Jensen KJ; Goei C; Jiang Z; Davies MG
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2021 Jul; 9(4):1017-1024.e7. PubMed ID: 33340728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality, Readability, and Accessibility of Online Content From a Google Search of "Macular Degeneration": Critical Analysis.
Hua HU; Rayess N; Li AS; Do D; Rahimy E
J Vitreoretin Dis; 2022; 6(6):437-442. PubMed ID: 37009540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality Assessment of Online Resources for Thoracic Outlet Syndrome Patients.
Clothier W; Treffalls JA; Tolbert PH; Harbin Z; Yan Q; Davies MG
Ann Vasc Surg; 2022 Sep; 85():96-104. PubMed ID: 35461994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Systematic Evaluation of the Quality, Accuracy, and Reliability of Internet Websites about Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.
Saleh D; Fisher JH; Provencher S; Liang Z; Ryerson CJ; Weatherald J
Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2022 Aug; 19(8):1404-1413. PubMed ID: 34813417
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Are English-language online patient education materials related to breast cancer risk assessment understandable, readable, and actionable?
Lamb LR; Baird GL; Roy IT; Choi PHS; Lehman CD; Miles RC
Breast; 2022 Feb; 61():29-34. PubMed ID: 34894464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Online Patient Information for Hysterectomies: A Systematic Environmental Scan of Quality and Readability.
Jain M; Chkipov P; Stacey D; Posner G; Bacal V; Chen I
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2022 Aug; 44(8):870-876. PubMed ID: 35487458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Readability and Quality of Online Health Information Regarding Parathyroidectomy.
Byrne J; Keogh S; Cullinane C; Razzaq Z; Redmond HP
OTO Open; 2022; 6(4):2473974X221133308. PubMed ID: 36311181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Readability Analysis of Online Headache and Migraine Information.
Russo A; Lavorgna L; Silvestro M; Abbadessa G; Bisecco A; Trojsi F; Tessitore A; Tedeschi G; Bonavita S
Headache; 2020 Jul; 60(7):1317-1324. PubMed ID: 32463516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An evaluation of the readability and visual appearance of online patient resources for fibroadenoma.
Hutchings HA; Remesh A
PLoS One; 2022; 17(11):e0277823. PubMed ID: 36399450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Online Patient Education Materials Related to Lipoprotein(a): Readability Assessment.
Pearson K; Ngo S; Ekpo E; Sarraju A; Baird G; Knowles J; Rodriguez F
J Med Internet Res; 2022 Jan; 24(1):e31284. PubMed ID: 35014955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An evaluation of the readability, quality, and accuracy of online health information regarding the treatment of hypospadias.
Cisu TI; Mingin GC; Baskin LS
J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Feb; 15(1):40.e1-40.e6. PubMed ID: 30449679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Readability Assessment of Online Patient Education Materials on Atrial Fibrillation.
Siddiqui E; Shah AM; Sambol J; Waller AH
Cureus; 2020 Sep; 12(9):e10397. PubMed ID: 33062517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of the Accuracy of Online Information Regarding Trigger Finger.
Hinds RM; Gottschalk MB; Muppavarapu RC; Naik AA; Yang SS; Capo JT
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol; 2016 Jun; 21(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 27454633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Critical Analysis of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Aspects of Online Information Provided for Neck-Lifts.
Rayess H; Zuliani GF; Gupta A; Svider PF; Folbe AJ; Eloy JA; Carron MA
JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2017 Mar; 19(2):115-120. PubMed ID: 27812680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.
Lim SJM; Kelly M; Selvarajah L; Murray M; Scanlon T
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33952225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lower Back Pain Imaging: A Readability Analysis.
Valentine MJ; Cottone G; Kramer HD; Kayastha A; Kim J; Pettinelli NJ; Kramer RC
Cureus; 2023 Sep; 15(9):e45174. PubMed ID: 37842495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Readability of websites containing information on dental implants.
Jayaratne YS; Anderson NK; Zwahlen RA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Dec; 25(12):1319-24. PubMed ID: 24148074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Readability assessment of online gynecologic oncology patient education materials from major governmental, non-profit and pharmaceutical organizations.
Samuel D; Vilardo N; Isani SS; Kuo DYS; Gressel GM
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Sep; 154(3):616-621. PubMed ID: 31324452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
