120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38010471)
1. Lost in translation: evaluating the readability of online patient information for neuroendocrine tumors.
Paschke A; Grewal US
Endocrine; 2024 Apr; 84(1):97-99. PubMed ID: 38010471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing the Accuracy and Readability of Online Health Information for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer.
Storino A; Castillo-Angeles M; Watkins AA; Vargas C; Mancias JD; Bullock A; Demirjian A; Moser AJ; Kent TS
JAMA Surg; 2016 Sep; 151(9):831-7. PubMed ID: 27144966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing the readability of online information about jones fracture.
Al-Kharouf KFK; Khan FI; Robertson GA
World J Methodol; 2023 Dec; 13(5):439-445. PubMed ID: 38229937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Are English-language online patient education materials related to breast cancer risk assessment understandable, readable, and actionable?
Lamb LR; Baird GL; Roy IT; Choi PHS; Lehman CD; Miles RC
Breast; 2022 Feb; 61():29-34. PubMed ID: 34894464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Online Patient Education Materials Related to Lipoprotein(a): Readability Assessment.
Pearson K; Ngo S; Ekpo E; Sarraju A; Baird G; Knowles J; Rodriguez F
J Med Internet Res; 2022 Jan; 24(1):e31284. PubMed ID: 35014955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Readability of websites containing information on dental implants.
Jayaratne YS; Anderson NK; Zwahlen RA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Dec; 25(12):1319-24. PubMed ID: 24148074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Readability and content gaps in online epilepsy surgery materials as potential health literacy and shared-decision-making barriers.
Seneviratne NU; Ho SY; Boro A; Correa DJ
Epilepsia Open; 2023 Dec; 8(4):1566-1575. PubMed ID: 37805810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality Assessment of Online Resources for Thoracic Outlet Syndrome Patients.
Clothier W; Treffalls JA; Tolbert PH; Harbin Z; Yan Q; Davies MG
Ann Vasc Surg; 2022 Sep; 85():96-104. PubMed ID: 35461994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Critical analysis of the quality of internet resources for patients with varicose veins.
Yan Q; Field AR; Jensen KJ; Goei C; Jiang Z; Davies MG
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2021 Jul; 9(4):1017-1024.e7. PubMed ID: 33340728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Health Literacy in Clubfoot: A Quantitative Assessment of the Readability, Understandability and Actionability of Online Patient Education Material.
Skalitzky MK; Gulbrandsen TR; Lorentzen W; Gao B; Shamrock AG; Weinstein SL; Morcuende JA
Iowa Orthop J; 2021; 41(1):61-67. PubMed ID: 34552405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Readability assessment of online gynecologic oncology patient education materials from major governmental, non-profit and pharmaceutical organizations.
Samuel D; Vilardo N; Isani SS; Kuo DYS; Gressel GM
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Sep; 154(3):616-621. PubMed ID: 31324452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Systematic Assessment of Google Search Queries and Readability of Online Gynecologic Oncology Patient Education Materials.
Martin A; Stewart JR; Gaskins J; Medlin E
J Cancer Educ; 2019 Jun; 34(3):435-440. PubMed ID: 29353371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Systematic Evaluation of the Quality, Accuracy, and Reliability of Internet Websites about Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.
Saleh D; Fisher JH; Provencher S; Liang Z; Ryerson CJ; Weatherald J
Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2022 Aug; 19(8):1404-1413. PubMed ID: 34813417
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Online Patient Information for Hysterectomies: A Systematic Environmental Scan of Quality and Readability.
Jain M; Chkipov P; Stacey D; Posner G; Bacal V; Chen I
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2022 Aug; 44(8):870-876. PubMed ID: 35487458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Readability of Orthopaedic Patient-reported Outcome Measures: Is There a Fundamental Failure to Communicate?
Perez JL; Mosher ZA; Watson SL; Sheppard ED; Brabston EW; McGwin G; Ponce BA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Aug; 475(8):1936-1947. PubMed ID: 28374349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality, Readability, and Accessibility of Online Content From a Google Search of "Macular Degeneration": Critical Analysis.
Hua HU; Rayess N; Li AS; Do D; Rahimy E
J Vitreoretin Dis; 2022; 6(6):437-442. PubMed ID: 37009540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Readability of Online Patient Educational Materials in Pediatric Orthopaedics: A Systematic Review.
Hecht CJ; Burkhart RJ; McNassor R; Mistovich RJ
J Pediatr Orthop; 2023 Aug; 43(7):e591-e599. PubMed ID: 36998166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Readability of online patient education materials for parents after a failed newborn hearing screen.
Sax L; Razak A; Shetty K; Cohen M; Levi J
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Oct; 125():168-174. PubMed ID: 31326734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An evaluation of the readability and visual appearance of online patient resources for fibroadenoma.
Hutchings HA; Remesh A
PLoS One; 2022; 17(11):e0277823. PubMed ID: 36399450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating the Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Trigeminal Neuralgia.
Joseph P; Silva NA; Nanda A; Gupta G
World Neurosurg; 2020 Dec; 144():e934-e938. PubMed ID: 32992056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
