These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38010717)
1. Population Weighting in Statistical Analysis. Si Y; Lee S; Heeringa SG JAMA Intern Med; 2024 Jan; 184(1):98-99. PubMed ID: 38010717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Design and Weighting Methods for a Nationally Representative Sample of HIV-infected Adults Receiving Medical Care in the United States-Medical Monitoring Project. Iachan R; Johnson CH; Harding RL; Kyle T; Saavedra P; Frazier EL; Beer L; Mattson CL; Skarbinski J Open AIDS J; 2016; 10():164-81. PubMed ID: 27651851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of Adair binding constants from experimental data obtained with an Imai cell. Statistical weighting functions. Johnson ML; Lassiter AE Biophys Chem; 1990 Oct; 38(1-2):159-65. PubMed ID: 2085650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multilevel Regression and Poststratification Versus Survey Sample Weighting for Estimating Population Quantities in Large Population Health Studies. Downes M; Carlin JB Am J Epidemiol; 2020 Jul; 189(7):717-725. PubMed ID: 32285096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimating population lung cancer risk from radon using a resource efficient stratified population weighted sample survey protocol - Lessons and results from Ireland. Murphy P; Dowdall A; Long S; Curtin B; Fenton D J Environ Radioact; 2021 Jul; 233():106582. PubMed ID: 33848713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Navigating complex sample analysis using national survey data. Saylor J; Friedmann E; Lee HJ Nurs Res; 2012; 61(3):231-7. PubMed ID: 22551998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transforming geographic scale: a comparison of combined population and areal weighting to other interpolation methods. Hallisey E; Tai E; Berens A; Wilt G; Peipins L; Lewis B; Graham S; Flanagan B; Lunsford NB Int J Health Geogr; 2017 Aug; 16(1):29. PubMed ID: 28784135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Should samples be weighted to decrease selection bias in online surveys during the COVID-19 pandemic? Data from seven datasets. Haddad C; Sacre H; Zeenny RM; Hajj A; Akel M; Iskandar K; Salameh P BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Mar; 22(1):63. PubMed ID: 35249541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Overview and Methodology of the Adolescent Behaviors and Experiences Survey - United States, January-June 2021. Rico A; Brener ND; Thornton J; Mpofu JJ; Harris WA; Roberts AM; Kilmer G; Chyen D; Whittle L; Leon-Nguyen M; Lim C; Saba A; Bryan LN; Smith-Grant J; Underwood JM MMWR Suppl; 2022 Apr; 71(3):1-7. PubMed ID: 35358169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimal weighting systems for direct age-adjustment of vital rates. Lee WC; Liaw YP Stat Med; 1999 Oct; 18(19):2645-54. PubMed ID: 10495462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. National Study of Adult Oral Health 2017-18: participation and representativeness. Ellershaw A; Chrisopoulos S; Luzzi L Aust Dent J; 2020 Jun; 65 Suppl 1():S11-S17. PubMed ID: 32583590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of entropy balance and probability weighting methods to generalize observational cohorts to a population: a simulation and empirical example. Harvey RA; Hayden JD; Kamble PS; Bouchard JR; Huang JC Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2017 Apr; 26(4):368-377. PubMed ID: 27859943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The upper limits of the SNR in radiography and CT with polyenergetic x-rays. Shikhaliev PM Phys Med Biol; 2010 Sep; 55(18):5317-39. PubMed ID: 20736493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Conditional Adaptive Weighted Test Method for Confirmatory Trials. Wang SJ; Hung HMJ Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2014 Jan; 48(1):51-55. PubMed ID: 30231420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A reduction factor in goodness-of-fit and independence tests for clustered and weighted observations. Choi JW; McHugh RB Biometrics; 1989 Sep; 45(3):979-96. PubMed ID: 2790132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An evaluation of whether propensity score adjustment can remove the self-selection bias inherent to web panel surveys addressing sensitive health behaviours. Copas A; Burkill S; Conrad F; Couper MP; Erens B BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Oct; 20(1):251. PubMed ID: 33032535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Novel Method of Weighting Cumulative Helmet Impacts Improves Correlation with Brain White Matter Changes After One Football Season of Sub-concussive Head Blows. Merchant-Borna K; Asselin P; Narayan D; Abar B; Jones CM; Bazarian JJ Ann Biomed Eng; 2016 Dec; 44(12):3679-3692. PubMed ID: 27350072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. On weighting approaches for missing data. Li L; Shen C; Li X; Robins JM Stat Methods Med Res; 2013 Feb; 22(1):14-30. PubMed ID: 21705435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interactively optimizing signal-to-noise ratios in expression profiling: project-specific algorithm selection and detection p-value weighting in Affymetrix microarrays. Seo J; Bakay M; Chen YW; Hilmer S; Shneiderman B; Hoffman EP Bioinformatics; 2004 Nov; 20(16):2534-44. PubMed ID: 15117752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. External validity of prevalence estimates from the national maternity surveys in England: The impact of response rate. Harrison S; Alderdice F; Quigley MA PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0242815. PubMed ID: 33253308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]