These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38010717)
21. Health Estimates Using Survey Raked-Weighting Techniques in an Australian Population Health Surveillance System. Dal Grande E; Chittleborough CR; Campostrini S; Tucker G; Taylor AW Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Sep; 182(6):544-56. PubMed ID: 26306665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Population Health Surveillance Using Mobile Phone Surveys in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Methodology and Sample Representativeness of a Cross-sectional Survey of Live Poultry Exposure in Bangladesh. Berry I; Mangtani P; Rahman M; Khan IA; Sarkar S; Naureen T; Greer AL; Morris SK; Fisman DN; Flora MS JMIR Public Health Surveill; 2021 Nov; 7(11):e29020. PubMed ID: 34766914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. National Couples' Health and Time Study: Sample, Design, and Weighting. Dush CMK; Manning WD; Berrigan MN; Marlar J; VanBergen A; Theodorou A; Tsabutashvili D; Chattopadhyay M Popul Res Policy Rev; 2023 Aug; 42(4):. PubMed ID: 37859760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of a weighting approach for performing sensitivity analysis after multiple imputation. Rezvan PH; White IR; Lee KJ; Carlin JB; Simpson JA BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Oct; 15():83. PubMed ID: 26464305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Investigating differences in treatment effect estimates between propensity score matching and weighting: a demonstration using STAR*D trial data. Ellis AR; Dusetzina SB; Hansen RA; Gaynes BN; Farley JF; Stürmer T Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2013 Feb; 22(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 23280682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Secondary data analyses of dietary surveys undertaken in South Africa to determine usual food consumption of the population. Steyn NP; Nel JH; Casey A Public Health Nutr; 2003 Oct; 6(7):631-44. PubMed ID: 14552664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Anthropometric dataset for the German working-age population using 3D body scans from a regional epidemiological health study and a weighting algorithm. Bonin D; Ackermann A; Radke D; Peters M; Wischniewski S Ergonomics; 2023 Aug; 66(8):1057-1071. PubMed ID: 36226532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Online consumer surveys as a methodology for assessing the quality of the United States health care system. Bethell C; Fiorillo J; Lansky D; Hendryx M; Knickman J J Med Internet Res; 2004 Jan; 6(1):e2. PubMed ID: 15111268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluating Nonresponse Weighting Adjustment for the Population-Based HIV Impact Assessment Surveys on Incorporating Survey Outcomes. Lin TH; Cervantes FI; Saito S; Bain R J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr; 2021 Aug; 87(Suppl 1):S52-S56. PubMed ID: 33512850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Analytical derivation of the b matrix of a time-efficient isotropic diffusion weighting gradient waveform. Trampel R; Johnson G Med Phys; 2013 Mar; 40(3):032301. PubMed ID: 23464333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Application-specific optimal model weighting of global climate models: A red tide example. Elshall A; Ye M; Kranz SA; Harrington J; Yang X; Wan Y; Maltrud M Clim Serv; 2022 Dec; 28():1-13. PubMed ID: 36816612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Improving External Validity of Epidemiologic Cohort Analyses: A Kernel Weighting Approach. Wang L; Graubard BI; Katki HA; Li Y J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc; 2020 Jun; 183(3):1293-1311. PubMed ID: 33071484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Assessing Bias in Population Size Estimates Among Hidden Populations When Using the Service Multiplier Method Combined With Respondent-Driven Sampling Surveys: Survey Study. Chabata ST; Fearon E; Webb EL; Weiss HA; Hargreaves JR; Cowan FM JMIR Public Health Surveill; 2020 Jun; 6(2):e15044. PubMed ID: 32459645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Overview and Methods for the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System - United States, 2021. Mpofu JJ; Underwood JM; Thornton JE; Brener ND; Rico A; Kilmer G; Harris WA; Leon-Nguyen M; Chyen D; Lim C; Mbaka CK; Smith-Grant J; Whittle L; Jones SE; Krause KH; Li J; Shanklin SL; McKinnon I; Arrey L; Queen BE; Roberts AM MMWR Suppl; 2023 Apr; 72(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 37104281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Assessment of smallholder farmers' adaptive capacity to climate change: Use of a mixed weighting scheme. Zanmassou YC; Al-Hassan RM; Mensah-Bonsu A; Osei-Asare YB; Igue CB J Environ Manage; 2020 Dec; 276():111275. PubMed ID: 32896822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The often overlooked issue of statistical power: this and other issues regarding assessing importance weighting in quality of life measures. Hsieh CM Soc Sci Res; 2015 Mar; 50():303-10. PubMed ID: 25592938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Health Utility Weighting of the Modified Rankin Scale: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Rebchuk AD; O'Neill ZR; Szefer EK; Hill MD; Field TS JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Apr; 3(4):e203767. PubMed ID: 32347948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Data analysis from surveys using complex sampling methods]. Lv J; He PP; Li LM Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 29(8):832-5. PubMed ID: 19103126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Eliciting benefit-risk preferences and probability-weighted utility using choice-format conjoint analysis. Van Houtven G; Johnson FR; Kilambi V; Hauber AB Med Decis Making; 2011; 31(3):469-80. PubMed ID: 21310854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Testing rare variants for hypertension using family-based tests with different weighting schemes. Wang X; Zhao X; Zhou J BMC Proc; 2016; 10(Suppl 7):233-237. PubMed ID: 27980642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]