These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38010717)
41. Weighting regressions by propensity scores. Freedman DA; Berk RA Eval Rev; 2008 Aug; 32(4):392-409. PubMed ID: 18591709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Comparison of genomic predictions using genomic relationship matrices built with different weighting factors to account for locus-specific variances. Su G; Christensen OF; Janss L; Lund MS J Dairy Sci; 2014 Oct; 97(10):6547-59. PubMed ID: 25129495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Small class sizes for improving student achievement in primary and secondary schools: a systematic review. Filges T; Sonne-Schmidt CS; Nielsen BCV Campbell Syst Rev; 2018; 14(1):1-107. PubMed ID: 37131395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Methodology of Natsal-COVID Wave 1: a large, quasi-representative survey with qualitative follow-up measuring the impact of COVID-19 on sexual and reproductive health in Britain. Dema E; Copas AJ; Clifton S; Conolly A; Blake M; Riddell J; Boso Perez R; Tanton C; Bonell C; Sonnenberg P; Mercer CH; Mitchell KR; Field N Wellcome Open Res; 2021; 6():209. PubMed ID: 35495088 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Unicompartmental compared with total knee replacement for patients with multimorbidities: a cohort study using propensity score stratification and inverse probability weighting. Prats-Uribe A; Kolovos S; Berencsi K; Carr A; Judge A; Silman A; Arden N; Petersen I; Douglas IJ; Wilkinson JM; Murray D; Valderas JM; Beard DJ; Lamb SE; Ali MS; Pinedo-Villanueva R; Strauss VY; Prieto-Alhambra D Health Technol Assess; 2021 Nov; 25(66):1-126. PubMed ID: 34812138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Shining a spotlight on scoring in the OSCE: Checklists and item weighting. Homer M; Fuller R; Hallam J; Pell G Med Teach; 2020 Sep; 42(9):1037-1042. PubMed ID: 32608303 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Inverse probability weighting and doubly robust methods in correcting the effects of non-response in the reimbursed medication and self-reported turnout estimates in the ATH survey. Härkänen T; Kaikkonen R; Virtala E; Koskinen S BMC Public Health; 2014 Nov; 14():1150. PubMed ID: 25373328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Adjustment for selection bias in observational studies with application to the analysis of autopsy data. Haneuse S; Schildcrout J; Crane P; Sonnen J; Breitner J; Larson E Neuroepidemiology; 2009; 32(3):229-39. PubMed ID: 19176974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Do alternative weighting approaches for an Index of Multiple Deprivation change the association with mortality? A sensitivity analysis from Germany. Schederecker F; Kurz C; Fairburn J; Maier W BMJ Open; 2019 Aug; 9(8):e028553. PubMed ID: 31455703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Preference Weighting of Health State Values: What Difference Does It Make, and Why? Lamu AN; Gamst-Klaussen T; Olsen JA Value Health; 2017 Mar; 20(3):451-457. PubMed ID: 28292490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies. Austin PC; Stuart EA Stat Med; 2015 Dec; 34(28):3661-79. PubMed ID: 26238958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Calibration Weighting Methods for the National Center for Health Statistics Research and Development Survey. Irimata KE; He Y; Parsons VL; Shin HC; Zhang G Vital Health Stat 2; 2023 Mar; (199):1-23. PubMed ID: 36940133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Constructing a representative sample of out-of-care HIV patients from a representative sample of in-care patients. Xia Q; Neaigus A; Bernard MA; Raj-Singh S; Shepard CW Int J STD AIDS; 2016 Oct; 27(12):1086-1092. PubMed ID: 26424160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Marginal mean weighting through stratification: a generalized method for evaluating multivalued and multiple treatments with nonexperimental data. Hong G Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):44-60. PubMed ID: 21843003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Weighted subtraction in 3D ultrashort echo time (UTE) imaging for visualization of short T2 tissues of the knee. Lee YH; Kim S; Song HT; Kim I; Suh JS Acta Radiol; 2014 May; 55(4):454-61. PubMed ID: 23934936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Assessing socioeconomic effects on different sized populations: to weight or not to weight? Frohlich N; Carriere KC; Potvin L; Black C J Epidemiol Community Health; 2001 Dec; 55(12):913-20. PubMed ID: 11707486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. A comparison of methods for calculating a stratified kappa. Barlow W; Lai MY; Azen SP Stat Med; 1991 Sep; 10(9):1465-72. PubMed ID: 1925174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Multiple imputation was a valid approach to estimate absolute risk from a prediction model based on case-cohort data. Mühlenbruch K; Kuxhaus O; di Giuseppe R; Boeing H; Weikert C; Schulze MB J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Apr; 84():130-141. PubMed ID: 28137672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. R-weighting provides better estimation for rat hearing sensitivity. Björk E; Nevalainen T; Hakumäki M; Voipio HM Lab Anim; 2000 Apr; 34(2):136-44. PubMed ID: 10817452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Estimating causal effects for survival (time-to-event) outcomes by combining classification tree analysis and propensity score weighting. Linden A; Yarnold PR J Eval Clin Pract; 2018 Apr; 24(2):380-387. PubMed ID: 29230910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]