These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

387 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38010802)

  • 1. The Readability and Quality of Web-Based Patient Information on Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Quantitative Content Analysis.
    Tan DJY; Ko TK; Fan KS
    JMIR Form Res; 2023 Nov; 7():e47762. PubMed ID: 38010802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. IVC filter - assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet.
    Ko TK; Yun Tan DJ; Hadeed S
    J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2024 Mar; 12(2):101695. PubMed ID: 37898304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.
    Lim SJM; Kelly M; Selvarajah L; Murray M; Scanlon T
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33952225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An Evaluation of the Content Quality, Readability, and Reliability of Publicly Available Web-Based Information on Pneumothorax Surgery in Ireland.
    Ho MP; Abrar S; Higgins PP; Doddakula KK
    Cureus; 2024 Jul; 16(7):e63800. PubMed ID: 39099997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality and Readability of Web-based Arabic Health Information on Denture Hygiene: An Infodemiology Study.
    Alhajj MN; Mashyakhy M; Ariffin Z; Ab-Ghani Z; Johari Y; Salim NS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Sep; 21(9):956-960. PubMed ID: 33568578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Systematic Evaluation of the Quality, Accuracy, and Reliability of Internet Websites about Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.
    Saleh D; Fisher JH; Provencher S; Liang Z; Ryerson CJ; Weatherald J
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2022 Aug; 19(8):1404-1413. PubMed ID: 34813417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cross sectional analysis of scoliosis-specific information on the internet: potential for patient confusion and misinformation.
    Truumees D; Duncan A; Mayer EK; Geck M; Singh D; Truumees E
    Spine Deform; 2020 Dec; 8(6):1159-1167. PubMed ID: 32578159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Osteotomy around the knee: Assessment of quality, content and readability of online information.
    Broderick JM; McCarthy A; Hogan N
    Knee; 2021 Jan; 28():139-150. PubMed ID: 33360380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.
    Guo WJ; Wang WK; Xu D; Qiao Z; Shi YL; Luo P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):494-502. PubMed ID: 30234809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Web-Based Health Information Following the Renewal of the Cervical Screening Program in Australia: Evaluation of Readability, Understandability, and Credibility.
    Mac OA; Thayre A; Tan S; Dodd RH
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Jun; 22(6):e16701. PubMed ID: 32442134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality and readability of web-based Arabic health information on periodontal disease.
    Al-Ak'hali MS; Fageeh HN; Halboub E; Alhajj MN; Ariffin Z
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 Feb; 21(1):41. PubMed ID: 33541345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality of Web-Based Patient Information on Robotic Radical Cystectomy Remains Poor: A Standardized Assessment.
    Pandolfo SD; Aveta A; Loizzo D; Crocerossa F; La Rocca R; Del Giudice F; Chung BI; Wu Z; Lucarelli G; Mirone V; Imbimbo C; Autorino R
    Urol Pract; 2022 Sep; 9(5):498-503. PubMed ID: 37145731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Information on the Internet about clear aligner treatment-an assessment of content, quality, and readability.
    Alpaydın MT; Buyuk SK; Canigur Bavbek N
    J Orofac Orthop; 2022 Oct; 83(Suppl 1):1-12. PubMed ID: 34269827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An objective analysis of quality and readability of online information on COVID-19.
    Wrigley Kelly NE; Murray KE; McCarthy C; O'Shea DB
    Health Technol (Berl); 2021; 11(5):1093-1099. PubMed ID: 34189011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Online Patient Information for Hysterectomies: A Systematic Environmental Scan of Quality and Readability.
    Jain M; Chkipov P; Stacey D; Posner G; Bacal V; Chen I
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2022 Aug; 44(8):870-876. PubMed ID: 35487458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Quality Assessment of the Information Accessible to Patients on the Internet About the Whipple Procedure.
    Khachfe HH; Chahrour MA; Habib JR; Yu J; Jamali FR
    World J Surg; 2021 Jun; 45(6):1853-1859. PubMed ID: 33580299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Online Patient Information on Domiciliary Oxygen Therapy: An Evaluation of Quality, Suitability, Reliability, Readability, and Content.
    Ang HL; Tan HH; Logie KM; McDonald CF; Khor YH
    Chest; 2022 Feb; 161(2):483-491. PubMed ID: 34390709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality and readability of web-based information on dental caries in Arabic: an infodemiological study.
    Aboalshamat K
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Oct; 23(1):797. PubMed ID: 37880640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality and readability of online health information on menopausal hormone therapy in Canada: what are our patients reading?
    Murtaza F; Shirreff L; Huang LN; Jacobson M; Jarcevic R; Christakis MK
    Menopause; 2021 Dec; 29(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 34905747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality Assessment of Online Resources for Thoracic Outlet Syndrome Patients.
    Clothier W; Treffalls JA; Tolbert PH; Harbin Z; Yan Q; Davies MG
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2022 Sep; 85():96-104. PubMed ID: 35461994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.