131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38011981)
1. Integrating participants as partners in research governance and operations: an approach from the
Hammack-Aviran C; Fair AM; Aldrich M; Richmond J; Carpenter SM; Watson KS; Cohn EG; Wilkins CH
BMJ Open; 2023 Nov; 13(11):e068100. PubMed ID: 38011981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Innovation in Large-Scale Research Programs: Elevating Research Participants to Governance Roles Through the All of Us Research Program Engagement Core.
Fair A; Watson KS; Cohn EG; Carpenter SM; Richardson-Heron D; Wilkins CH
Acad Med; 2022 Dec; 97(12):1794-1798. PubMed ID: 36449919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
Newell S; Jordan Z
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 26447009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development and evaluation of a virtual patient-centered outcomes research training program for the cystic fibrosis community.
Godfrey EM; Thayer EK; Mentch L; Kazmerski TM; Brown G; Pam M; Al Achkar M
Res Involv Engagem; 2021 Dec; 7(1):86. PubMed ID: 34863273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Re-Envisioning the Canadian Nephrology Trials Network: A Can-SOLVE-CKD Stakeholder Meeting of Patient Partners and Researchers.
Murdoch A; Tennankore KK; Bohm C; Clase CM; Levin A; Vorster H; Suri RS
Can J Kidney Health Dis; 2021; 8():20543581211030396. PubMed ID: 34345433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating the impacts of patient engagement on a national health research network: results of a case study of the Chronic Pain Network.
Tripp L; Richards DP; Daly-Cyr J; Lane T; Linkiewich D; Begley KN; Buckley N; Hudspith M; Poulin P; Abelson J
Res Involv Engagem; 2023 Aug; 9(1):73. PubMed ID: 37649098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. "I think there has to be a mutual respect for there to be value": Evaluating patient engagement in a national clinical trial on de-implementation of low value care.
Etchegary H; Linklater S; Duquette D'; Wilkinson G; Francis V; Gionet E; Patey AM; Grimshaw JM
Res Involv Engagem; 2023 Aug; 9(1):70. PubMed ID: 37633983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Youth engagement in research: exploring training needs of youth with neurodevelopmental disabilities.
Dong SY; Nguyen L; Cross A; Doherty-Kirby A; Geboers J; McCauley D; Soper AK; St Dennis A; Steeves D; Trehan N; Gorter JW
Res Involv Engagem; 2023 Jul; 9(1):50. PubMed ID: 37430378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Working together in health research: a mixed-methods patient engagement evaluation.
Babatunde S; Ahmed S; Santana MJ; Nielssen I; Zelinsky S; Ambasta A
Res Involv Engagem; 2023 Aug; 9(1):62. PubMed ID: 37528438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evolving partnerships: engagement methods in an established health services research team.
Chamberlain SA; Gruneir A; Keefe JM; Berendonk C; Corbett K; Bishop R; Bond G; Forbes F; Kieloch B; Mann J; Thelker C; Estabrooks CA
Res Involv Engagem; 2021 Oct; 7(1):71. PubMed ID: 34627403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of a national training programme to support engagement in mental health services: Learning enablers and learning gains.
Frawley T; Carroll L; Casey M; Davies C; Durning J; Halligan P; Joye R; Redmond C; Fealy G
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2019 Nov; 26(9-10):323-336. PubMed ID: 31188513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the partners in research course: a patient and researcher co-created course to build capacity in patient-oriented research.
Courvoisier M; Baddeliyanage R; Wilhelm L; Bayliss L; Straus SE; Fahim C
Res Involv Engagem; 2021 Oct; 7(1):76. PubMed ID: 34717764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Co-production of a systematic review on decision coaching: a mixed methods case study within a review.
Jull J; Smith M; Carley M; Stacey D; Graham ID;
Syst Rev; 2024 Jun; 13(1):149. PubMed ID: 38831444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient and family engagement in the development of core outcome sets for two rare chronic diseases in children.
Vanderhout SM; Smith M; Pallone N; Tingley K; Pugliese M; Chakraborty P; Stockler S; Offringa M; Butcher N; Nicholls SG; Potter BK
Res Involv Engagem; 2021 Sep; 7(1):66. PubMed ID: 34521478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Community recommendations on biobank governance: Results from a deliberative community engagement in California.
Dry SM; Garrett SB; Koenig BA; Brown AF; Burgess MM; Hult JR; Longstaff H; Wilcox ES; Madrigal Contreras SK; Martinez A; Boyd EA; Dohan D
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172582. PubMed ID: 28235046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Multilevel Approach to Stakeholder Engagement in the Formulation of a Clinical Data Research Network.
Boyer AP; Fair AM; Joosten YA; Dolor RJ; Williams NA; Sherden L; Stallings S; Smoot DT; Wilkins CH
Med Care; 2018 Oct; 56 Suppl 10 Suppl 1(10 Suppl 1):S22-S26. PubMed ID: 30074947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sharing data for future research-engaging participants' views about data governance beyond the original project: a DIRECT Study.
Shah N; Coathup V; Teare H; Forgie I; Giordano GN; Hansen TH; Groeneveld L; Hudson M; Pearson E; Ruetten H; Kaye J
Genet Med; 2019 May; 21(5):1131-1138. PubMed ID: 30262927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Engaging Consumers in Medicaid Program Design: Strategies from the States.
Zhu JM; Rowland R; Gunn R; Gollust S; Grande DT
Milbank Q; 2021 Mar; 99(1):99-125. PubMed ID: 33320389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adapting a conceptual framework to engage diverse stakeholders in genomic/precision medicine research.
Watson KS; Cohn EG; Fair A; Menon U; Szalacha LA; Carpenter SM; Wilkins CH
Health Expect; 2022 Aug; 25(4):1478-1485. PubMed ID: 35353945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
