BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38013365)

  • 1. Assessing internal mammary lymph node metastasis by breast magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer.
    Cho SM; Cha JH; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Chae EY; Choi WJ; Eom HJ; Kim HJ
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Nov; 102(47):e36301. PubMed ID: 38013365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Assessment of Internal Mammary Lymph Node Status in Breast Cancer.
    Lee HW; Kim SH
    J Breast Cancer; 2016 Jun; 19(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 27382396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of pelvic lymph node metastasis in bladder cancer.
    Li Y; Diao F; Shi S; Li K; Zhu W; Wu S; Lin T
    Chin J Cancer; 2018 Jan; 37(1):3. PubMed ID: 29370848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnosis of lymph node metastasis on rectal cancer by PET-CT computer imaging combined with MRI technology.
    Li F; Hu J; Jiang H; Sun Y
    J Infect Public Health; 2020 Sep; 13(9):1347-1353. PubMed ID: 31289005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Incidence of Internal Mammary Lymph Nodes with Silicone Breast Implants at MR Imaging after Oncoplastic Surgery.
    Sutton EJ; Watson EJ; Gibbons G; Goldman DA; Moskowitz CS; Jochelson MS; Dershaw DD; Morris EA
    Radiology; 2015 Nov; 277(2):381-7. PubMed ID: 26098457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Role of diffusion-weighted MRI: predicting axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer.
    Chung J; Youk JH; Kim JA; Gweon HM; Kim EK; Ryu YH; Son EJ
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Oct; 55(8):909-16. PubMed ID: 24234236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic value of breast MRI for predicting metastatic axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients: diffusion-weighted MRI and conventional MRI.
    Kim EJ; Kim SH; Kang BJ; Choi BG; Song BJ; Choi JJ
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Dec; 32(10):1230-6. PubMed ID: 25072504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Imaging and Management of Internal Mammary Lymph Nodes.
    Samreen N; Dhage S; Gerber NK; Chacko C; Lee CS
    J Breast Imaging; 2020 Nov; 2(6):530-540. PubMed ID: 38424849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) in differentiating between benign and metastatic lymph nodes in cases of cholangiocarcinoma.
    Promsorn J; Soontrapa W; Somsap K; Chamadol N; Limpawattana P; Harisinghani M
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Feb; 44(2):473-481. PubMed ID: 30151713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of axillary lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer with diffusion-weighted MR imaging in combination with routine and dynamic contrast MR imaging.
    Razek AA; Lattif MA; Denewer A; Farouk O; Nada N
    Breast Cancer; 2016 May; 23(3):525-32. PubMed ID: 25763535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Internal mammary lymph nodes as incidental findings at screening breast MRI.
    Ray KM; Munir R; Wisner DJ; Azziz A; Holland BC; Kornak J; Joe BN
    Clin Imaging; 2015; 39(5):791-3. PubMed ID: 26072093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic performance of T2-weighted imaging and intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MRI for predicting metastatic axillary lymph nodes in T1 and T2 stage breast cancer.
    Liu Y; Luo H; Wang C; Chen X; Wang M; Zhou P; Ren J
    Acta Radiol; 2022 Apr; 63(4):447-457. PubMed ID: 33779304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Metastatic Rate of Internal Mammary Lymph Nodes When Metastasis of Internal Mammary Lymph Node Is Suspected on PET/CT.
    Choi JE
    J Breast Cancer; 2013 Jun; 16(2):202-7. PubMed ID: 23843854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Management of MRI-Detected Benign Internal Mammary Lymph Nodes.
    Gunes G; Crivellaro P; Muradali D
    Indian J Radiol Imaging; 2022 Jun; 32(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 35924122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Comprehensive Comparison of CT, MRI, Positron Emission Tomography or Positron Emission Tomography/CT, and Diffusion Weighted Imaging-MRI for Detecting the Lymph Nodes Metastases in Patients with Cervical Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Based on 67 Studies.
    Liu B; Gao S; Li S
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2017; 82(3):209-222. PubMed ID: 28183074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging increases diagnostic accuracy of breast MR imaging for predicting axillary metastases in breast cancer patients.
    Guvenc I; Whitman GJ; Liu P; Yalniz C; Ma J; Dogan BE
    Breast J; 2019 Jan; 25(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 30444286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography versus conventional imaging for the diagnosis of breast cancer and lymph node metastases.
    Shao M; Zi J; Wen G
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2018 Sep; 14(Supplement):S661-S666. PubMed ID: 30249884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Value of MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging in diagnosing normal-sized pelvic lymph nodes metastases in patients with cervical cancer.
    Song Q; Yu Y; Zhang X; Zhu Y; Luo Y; Yu T; Sun J; Liu F; Dong Y
    Br J Radiol; 2022 Sep; 95(1138):20200203. PubMed ID: 33095657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pre- and post-magnetic resonance imaging features of suspicious internal mammary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients receiving neo-adjuvant therapy: Are any imaging features predictive of malignancy?
    Patel S; Delikat A; Liao J; Chetlen AL
    Breast J; 2018 Nov; 24(6):997-1000. PubMed ID: 30066351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in discriminating between metastatic and non-metastatic pelvic lymph nodes in endometrial cancer.
    Arian A; Easa AM; Arab-Ahmadi M
    Acta Radiol; 2020 Nov; 61(11):1580-1586. PubMed ID: 32106683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.