These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38014252)

  • 1. The effects of mutation and recombination rate heterogeneity on the inference of demography and the distribution of fitness effects.
    Soni V; Pfeifer SP; Jensen JD
    bioRxiv; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 38014252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Effects of Mutation and Recombination Rate Heterogeneity on the Inference of Demography and the Distribution of Fitness Effects.
    Soni V; Pfeifer SP; Jensen JD
    Genome Biol Evol; 2024 Feb; 16(2):. PubMed ID: 38207127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. polyDFE: Inferring the Distribution of Fitness Effects and Properties of Beneficial Mutations from Polymorphism Data.
    Tataru P; Bataillon T
    Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2090():125-146. PubMed ID: 31975166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Impact of Purifying and Background Selection on the Inference of Population History: Problems and Prospects.
    Johri P; Riall K; Becher H; Excoffier L; Charlesworth B; Jensen JD
    Mol Biol Evol; 2021 Jun; 38(7):2986-3003. PubMed ID: 33591322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Promise of Inferring the Past Using the Ancestral Recombination Graph.
    Brandt DYC; Huber CD; Chiang CWK; Ortega-Del Vecchyo D
    Genome Biol Evol; 2024 Feb; 16(2):. PubMed ID: 38242694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of purifying and background selection on the inference of population history: problems and prospects.
    Johri P; Riall K; Becher H; Excoffier L; Charlesworth B; Jensen JD
    bioRxiv; 2021 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 33501439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biases in ARG-based inference of historical population size in populations experiencing selection.
    Marsh JI; Johri P
    Mol Biol Evol; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38874402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of non-neutral synonymous mutations when inferring selection on non-synonymous mutations.
    Zurita AMI; Kyriazis CC; Lohmueller KE
    bioRxiv; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38370782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Developing an Evolutionary Baseline Model for Humans: Jointly Inferring Purifying Selection with Population History.
    Johri P; Pfeifer SP; Jensen JD
    Mol Biol Evol; 2023 May; 40(5):. PubMed ID: 37128989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hill-Robertson interference may bias the inference of fitness effects of new mutations in highly selfing species.
    Daigle A; Johri P
    bioRxiv; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38370745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Joint inference of the distribution of fitness effects of deleterious mutations and population demography based on nucleotide polymorphism frequencies.
    Keightley PD; Eyre-Walker A
    Genetics; 2007 Dec; 177(4):2251-61. PubMed ID: 18073430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inferring Fitness Effects from Time-Resolved Sequence Data with a Delay-Deterministic Model.
    Nené NR; Dunham AS; Illingworth CJR
    Genetics; 2018 May; 209(1):255-264. PubMed ID: 29500183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Developing an evolutionary baseline model for humans: jointly inferring purifying selection with population history.
    Johri P; Pfeifer SP; Jensen JD
    bioRxiv; 2023 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 37090533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Background selection and biased gene conversion affect more than 95% of the human genome and bias demographic inferences.
    Pouyet F; Aeschbacher S; Thiéry A; Excoffier L
    Elife; 2018 Aug; 7():. PubMed ID: 30125248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Toward an Evolutionarily Appropriate Null Model: Jointly Inferring Demography and Purifying Selection.
    Johri P; Charlesworth B; Jensen JD
    Genetics; 2020 May; 215(1):173-192. PubMed ID: 32152045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Increased Positive Selection in Highly Recombining Genes Does not Necessarily Reflect an Evolutionary Advantage of Recombination.
    Joseph J
    Mol Biol Evol; 2024 Jun; 41(6):. PubMed ID: 38829800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A general population genetic framework for antagonistic selection that accounts for demography and recurrent mutation.
    Connallon T; Clark AG
    Genetics; 2012 Apr; 190(4):1477-89. PubMed ID: 22298707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inferring Epistasis from Genetic Time-series Data.
    Sohail MS; Louie RHY; Hong Z; Barton JP; McKay MR
    Mol Biol Evol; 2022 Oct; 39(10):. PubMed ID: 36130322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. fastsimcoal2: demographic inference under complex evolutionary scenarios.
    Excoffier L; Marchi N; Marques DA; Matthey-Doret R; Gouy A; Sousa VC
    Bioinformatics; 2021 Dec; 37(24):4882-4885. PubMed ID: 34164653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Selection bias in mutation accumulation.
    Wahl LM; Agashe D
    Evolution; 2022 Mar; 76(3):528-540. PubMed ID: 34989408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.