BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38015437)

  • 1. Exome-wide benchmark of difficult-to-sequence regions using short-read next-generation DNA sequencing.
    Hijikata A; Suyama M; Kikugawa S; Matoba R; Naruto T; Enomoto Y; Kurosawa K; Harada N; Yanagi K; Kaname T; Miyako K; Takazawa M; Sasai H; Hosokawa J; Itoga S; Yamaguchi T; Kosho T; Matsubara K; Kuroki Y; Fukami M; Adachi K; Nanba E; Tsuchida N; Uchiyama Y; Matsumoto N; Nishimura K; Ohara O
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2024 Jan; 52(1):114-124. PubMed ID: 38015437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors Affecting Migration to GRCh38 in Laboratories Performing Clinical Next-Generation Sequencing.
    Lansdon LA; Cadieux-Dion M; Yoo B; Miller N; Cohen ASA; Zellmer L; Zhang L; Farrow EG; Thiffault I; Repnikova EA; Cooley LD; Alaimo JT; Porath B; Herriges JC; Saunders CJ; Farooqi MS
    J Mol Diagn; 2021 May; 23(5):651-657. PubMed ID: 33631350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Opportunities and challenges of whole-genome and -exome sequencing.
    Petersen BS; Fredrich B; Hoeppner MP; Ellinghaus D; Franke A
    BMC Genet; 2017 Feb; 18(1):14. PubMed ID: 28193154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Systematic benchmark of state-of-the-art variant calling pipelines identifies major factors affecting accuracy of coding sequence variant discovery.
    Barbitoff YA; Abasov R; Tvorogova VE; Glotov AS; Predeus AV
    BMC Genomics; 2022 Feb; 23(1):155. PubMed ID: 35193511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of copy number variant detection from panel-based next-generation sequencing data.
    Yao R; Yu T; Qing Y; Wang J; Shen Y
    Mol Genet Genomic Med; 2019 Jan; 7(1):e00513. PubMed ID: 30565893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance comparison: exome sequencing as a single test replacing Sanger sequencing.
    Fridman H; Bormans C; Einhorn M; Au D; Bormans A; Porat Y; Sanchez LF; Manning B; Levy-Lahad E; Behar DM
    Mol Genet Genomics; 2021 May; 296(3):653-663. PubMed ID: 33694043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identifying, understanding, and correcting technical artifacts on the sex chromosomes in next-generation sequencing data.
    Webster TH; Couse M; Grande BM; Karlins E; Phung TN; Richmond PA; Whitford W; Wilson MA
    Gigascience; 2019 Jul; 8(7):. PubMed ID: 31289836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance assessment of DNA sequencing platforms in the ABRF Next-Generation Sequencing Study.
    Foox J; Tighe SW; Nicolet CM; Zook JM; Byrska-Bishop M; Clarke WE; Khayat MM; Mahmoud M; Laaguiby PK; Herbert ZT; Warner D; Grills GS; Jen J; Levy S; Xiang J; Alonso A; Zhao X; Zhang W; Teng F; Zhao Y; Lu H; Schroth GP; Narzisi G; Farmerie W; Sedlazeck FJ; Baldwin DA; Mason CE
    Nat Biotechnol; 2021 Sep; 39(9):1129-1140. PubMed ID: 34504351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using synthetic chromosome controls to evaluate the sequencing of difficult regions within the human genome.
    Reis ALM; Deveson IW; Madala BS; Wong T; Barker C; Xu J; Lennon N; Tong W; Mercer TR;
    Genome Biol; 2022 Jan; 23(1):19. PubMed ID: 35022065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Systematic Evaluation of Sanger Validation of Next-Generation Sequencing Variants.
    Beck TF; Mullikin JC; ; Biesecker LG
    Clin Chem; 2016 Apr; 62(4):647-54. PubMed ID: 26847218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Aligning to the sample-specific reference sequence to optimize the accuracy of next-generation sequencing analysis for hepatitis B virus.
    Liu WC; Lin CP; Cheng CP; Ho CH; Lan KL; Cheng JH; Yen CJ; Cheng PN; Wu IC; Li IC; Chang BC; Tseng VS; Chiu YC; Chang TT
    Hepatol Int; 2016 Jan; 10(1):147-57. PubMed ID: 26208819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improvements and impacts of GRCh38 human reference on high throughput sequencing data analysis.
    Guo Y; Dai Y; Yu H; Zhao S; Samuels DC; Shyr Y
    Genomics; 2017 Mar; 109(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 28131802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Medical implications of technical accuracy in genome sequencing.
    Goldfeder RL; Priest JR; Zook JM; Grove ME; Waggott D; Wheeler MT; Salit M; Ashley EA
    Genome Med; 2016 Mar; 8(1):24. PubMed ID: 26932475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Navigating highly homologous genes in a molecular diagnostic setting: a resource for clinical next-generation sequencing.
    Mandelker D; Schmidt RJ; Ankala A; McDonald Gibson K; Bowser M; Sharma H; Duffy E; Hegde M; Santani A; Lebo M; Funke B
    Genet Med; 2016 Dec; 18(12):1282-1289. PubMed ID: 27228465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Barcode-free next-generation sequencing error validation for ultra-rare variant detection.
    Yeom H; Lee Y; Ryu T; Noh J; Lee AC; Lee HB; Kang E; Song SW; Kwon S
    Nat Commun; 2019 Feb; 10(1):977. PubMed ID: 30816127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An investigation of causes of false positive single nucleotide polymorphisms using simulated reads from a small eukaryote genome.
    Ribeiro A; Golicz A; Hackett CA; Milne I; Stephen G; Marshall D; Flavell AJ; Bayer M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Nov; 16():382. PubMed ID: 26558718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Third Revolution in Sequencing Technology.
    van Dijk EL; Jaszczyszyn Y; Naquin D; Thermes C
    Trends Genet; 2018 Sep; 34(9):666-681. PubMed ID: 29941292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. NGS-pipe: a flexible, easily extendable and highly configurable framework for NGS analysis.
    Singer J; Ruscheweyh HJ; Hofmann AL; Thurnherr T; Singer F; Toussaint NC; Ng CKY; Piscuoglio S; Beisel C; Christofori G; Dummer R; Hall MN; Krek W; Levesque MP; Manz MG; Moch H; Papassotiropoulos A; Stekhoven DJ; Wild P; Wüst T; Rinn B; Beerenwinkel N
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Jan; 34(1):107-108. PubMed ID: 28968639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. NGSCheckMate: software for validating sample identity in next-generation sequencing studies within and across data types.
    Lee S; Lee S; Ouellette S; Park WY; Lee EA; Park PJ
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Jun; 45(11):e103. PubMed ID: 28369524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of copy number variation analysis for next-generation sequencing diagnostics.
    Ellingford JM; Campbell C; Barton S; Bhaskar S; Gupta S; Taylor RL; Sergouniotis PI; Horn B; Lamb JA; Michaelides M; Webster AR; Newman WG; Panda B; Ramsden SC; Black GC
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2017 Jun; 25(6):719-724. PubMed ID: 28378820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.