These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38016232)

  • 1. Decoupling livestock and poultry pollution emissions from industrial development: A step towards reducing environmental emissions.
    Elahi E; Li G; Han X; Zhu W; Liu Y; Cheng A; Yang Y
    J Environ Manage; 2024 Jan; 350():119654. PubMed ID: 38016232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamic Relationships, Regional Differences, and Driving Mechanisms between Economic Development and Carbon Emissions from the Farming Industry: Empirical Evidence from Rural China.
    Liu W; Xu R; Deng Y; Lu W; Zhou B; Zhao M
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Feb; 18(5):. PubMed ID: 33668785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Decoupling agriculture pollution and carbon reduction from economic growth in the Yangtze River Delta, China.
    Yuan R; Xu C; Kong F
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(1):e0280268. PubMed ID: 36662737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diffusion pollution from livestock and poultry rearing in the Yangtze Delta, China.
    Gu P; Shen RF; Chen YD
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2008 May; 15(3):273-7. PubMed ID: 18504847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Driving Effect of Decoupling Provincial Industrial Economic Growth and Industrial Carbon Emissions in China.
    Hua J; Gao J; Chen K; Li J
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Dec; 20(1):. PubMed ID: 36612465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatial Evolutionary Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Urban Industrial Carbon Emission in China.
    Zhang X; Shen M; Luan Y; Cui W; Lin X
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Sep; 19(18):. PubMed ID: 36141499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The pollutants from livestock and poultry farming in China-geographic distribution and drivers.
    Gan L; Hu X
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 May; 23(9):8470-83. PubMed ID: 26782328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Decomposition of driving factors of industry-related CO
    Lai WT; Wang Y; Huang LL; Huang YM; Luo J; Chen HY
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2020 Oct; 31(10):3529-3538. PubMed ID: 33314843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring pollutant emissions of cattle breeding and its spatial-temporal variation in China.
    Yang T; Li F; Du M; Wang Y; Sun Z
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Dec; 299():113615. PubMed ID: 34488108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Carbonization and atmospheric pollution in China: The asymmetric impacts of forests, livestock production, and economic progress on CO
    Rehman A; Ulucak R; Murshed M; Ma H; Işık C
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Sep; 294():113059. PubMed ID: 34146929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Leading Role of Water Resources and Animal Husbandry in Environmental Sustainability: A Case Study of China.
    Zhou L; Zhang J; Zhang X; Zhang J
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jun; 30(28):72146-72159. PubMed ID: 37165265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Decoupling and Decomposition Analysis of Agricultural Carbon Emissions: Evidence from Heilongjiang Province, China.
    Huang Q; Zhang Y
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Dec; 19(1):. PubMed ID: 35010458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatial econometric analysis of environmental total factor productivity of ranimal husbandry and its influencing factors in China during 2001-2017.
    Han Z; Han C; Yang C
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Jun; 723():137726. PubMed ID: 32213419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatiotemporal variations and influencing factors of methane emissions from livestock in China: A spatial econometric analysis.
    Zhao H; Jia X; Yang J; Wu Y; Wu X; Du L
    Sci Total Environ; 2024 Jun; 931():173010. PubMed ID: 38710396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Decoupling trend and emission reduction potential of CO
    Peng D; Yi J; Chen A; Chen H; Yang J
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Feb; 30(9):23781-23795. PubMed ID: 36327082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Driving factors and decoupling trend analysis between agricultural CO
    Yang J; Luo P; Li L
    Math Biosci Eng; 2022 Sep; 19(12):13093-13113. PubMed ID: 36654037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Study on the Decoupling and Interaction Effect between Industrial Structure Upgrading and Carbon Emissions under Dual Carbon Targets.
    Sun Y; Liu Y; Yang Z; Wang M; Zhang C; Wang L
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Jan; 20(3):. PubMed ID: 36767311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Crop Production and Agricultural Carbon Emissions: Relationship Diagnosis and Decomposition Analysis.
    Sui J; Lv W
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Aug; 18(15):. PubMed ID: 34360511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Decoupling between Economic Development and Carbon Emissions and Its Driving Factors: Evidence from China.
    Zhao X; Jiang M; Zhang W
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Mar; 19(5):. PubMed ID: 35270588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implementing an appropriate metric for the assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from livestock production: A national case study.
    Hörtenhuber SJ; Seiringer M; Theurl MC; Größbacher V; Piringer G; Kral I; Zollitsch WJ
    Animal; 2022 Oct; 16(10):100638. PubMed ID: 36182718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.