225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38016949)
1. PhenoSV: interpretable phenotype-aware model for the prioritization of genes affected by structural variants.
Xu Z; Li Q; Marchionni L; Wang K
Nat Commun; 2023 Nov; 14(1):7805. PubMed ID: 38016949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. StrVCTVRE: A supervised learning method to predict the pathogenicity of human genome structural variants.
Sharo AG; Hu Z; Sunyaev SR; Brenner SE
Am J Hum Genet; 2022 Feb; 109(2):195-209. PubMed ID: 35032432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. nanotatoR: a tool for enhanced annotation of genomic structural variants.
Bhattacharya S; Barseghyan H; Délot EC; Vilain E
BMC Genomics; 2021 Jan; 22(1):10. PubMed ID: 33407088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prioritization of genes driving congenital phenotypes of patients with de novo genomic structural variants.
Middelkamp S; Vlaar JM; Giltay J; Korzelius J; Besselink N; Boymans S; Janssen R; de la Fonteijne L; van Binsbergen E; van Roosmalen MJ; Hochstenbach R; Giachino D; Talkowski ME; Kloosterman WP; Cuppen E
Genome Med; 2019 Dec; 11(1):79. PubMed ID: 31801603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Expectations and blind spots for structural variation detection from long-read assemblies and short-read genome sequencing technologies.
Zhao X; Collins RL; Lee WP; Weber AM; Jun Y; Zhu Q; Weisburd B; Huang Y; Audano PA; Wang H; Walker M; Lowther C; Fu J; ; Gerstein MB; Devine SE; Marschall T; Korbel JO; Eichler EE; Chaisson MJP; Lee C; Mills RE; Brand H; Talkowski ME
Am J Hum Genet; 2021 May; 108(5):919-928. PubMed ID: 33789087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comprehensive evaluation of structural variation detection algorithms for whole genome sequencing.
Kosugi S; Momozawa Y; Liu X; Terao C; Kubo M; Kamatani Y
Genome Biol; 2019 Jun; 20(1):117. PubMed ID: 31159850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cue: a deep-learning framework for structural variant discovery and genotyping.
Popic V; Rohlicek C; Cunial F; Hajirasouliha I; Meleshko D; Garimella K; Maheshwari A
Nat Methods; 2023 Apr; 20(4):559-568. PubMed ID: 36959322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Geographic distribution and adaptive significance of genomic structural variants: an anthropological genetics perspective.
Eaaswarkhanth M; Pavlidis P; Gokcumen O
Hum Biol; 2014; 86(4):260-75. PubMed ID: 25959693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. NPSV: A simulation-driven approach to genotyping structural variants in whole-genome sequencing data.
Linderman MD; Paudyal C; Shakeel M; Kelley W; Bashir A; Gelb BD
Gigascience; 2021 Jul; 10(7):. PubMed ID: 34195837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. SVLR: Genome Structural Variant Detection Using Long-Read Sequencing Data.
Gu W; Zhou A; Wang L; Sun S; Cui X; Zhu D
J Comput Biol; 2021 Aug; 28(8):774-788. PubMed ID: 33973820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A sequence-aware merger of genomic structural variations at population scale.
Zheng Z; Zhu M; Zhang J; Liu X; Hou L; Liu W; Yuan S; Luo C; Yao X; Liu J; Yang Y
Nat Commun; 2024 Feb; 15(1):960. PubMed ID: 38307885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection of genomic structural variations in Guizhou indigenous pigs and the comparison with other breeds.
Liu C; Ran X; Wang J; Li S; Liu J
PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0194282. PubMed ID: 29558483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How structural variants shape avian phenotypes: Lessons from model systems.
Recuerda M; Campagna L
Mol Ecol; 2024 Jun; 33(11):e17364. PubMed ID: 38651830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. SVFX: a machine learning framework to quantify the pathogenicity of structural variants.
Kumar S; Harmanci A; Vytheeswaran J; Gerstein MB
Genome Biol; 2020 Nov; 21(1):274. PubMed ID: 33168059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optical genome mapping and revisiting short-read genome sequencing data reveal previously overlooked structural variants disrupting retinal disease-associated genes.
de Bruijn SE; Rodenburg K; Corominas J; Ben-Yosef T; Reurink J; Kremer H; Whelan L; Plomp AS; Berger W; Farrar GJ; Ferenc Kovács Á; Fajardy I; Hitti-Malin RJ; Weisschuh N; Weener ME; Sharon D; Pennings RJE; Haer-Wigman L; Hoyng CB; Nelen MR; Vissers LELM; van den Born LI; Gilissen C; Cremers FPM; Hoischen A; Neveling K; Roosing S
Genet Med; 2023 Mar; 25(3):100345. PubMed ID: 36524988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. PGG.SV: a whole-genome-sequencing-based structural variant resource and data analysis platform.
Wang Y; Ling Y; Gong J; Zhao X; Zhou H; Xie B; Lou H; Zhuang X; Jin L; ; Fan S; Zhang G; Xu S
Nucleic Acids Res; 2023 Jan; 51(D1):D1109-D1116. PubMed ID: 36243989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Integrating whole-genome sequencing with multi-omic data reveals the impact of structural variants on gene regulation in the human brain.
Vialle RA; de Paiva Lopes K; Bennett DA; Crary JF; Raj T
Nat Neurosci; 2022 Apr; 25(4):504-514. PubMed ID: 35288716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. SVExpress: identifying gene features altered recurrently in expression with nearby structural variant breakpoints.
Zhang Y; Chen F; Creighton CJ
BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Mar; 22(1):135. PubMed ID: 33743584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. NPSV-deep: a deep learning method for genotyping structural variants in short read genome sequencing data.
Linderman MD; Wallace J; van der Heyde A; Wieman E; Brey D; Shi Y; Hansen P; Shamsi Z; Liu J; Gelb BD; Bashir A
Bioinformatics; 2024 Mar; 40(3):. PubMed ID: 38444093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Unravelling the tumour genome: The evolutionary and clinical impacts of structural variants in tumourigenesis.
Hamdan A; Ewing A
J Pathol; 2022 Jul; 257(4):479-493. PubMed ID: 35355264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
