208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38019516)
61. Economic evaluation of prostate cancer risk assessment methods: A cost-effectiveness analysis using population data.
Mohammadi T; Guh DP; Tam ACT; Pataky RE; Black PC; So A; Lynd LD; Zhang W; Conklin AI
Cancer Med; 2023 Oct; 12(19):20106-20118. PubMed ID: 37740609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Cost-effectiveness of a new urinary biomarker-based risk score compared to standard of care in prostate cancer diagnostics - a decision analytical model.
Dijkstra S; Govers TM; Hendriks RJ; Schalken JA; Van Criekinge W; Van Neste L; Grutters JPC; Sedelaar JPM; van Oort IM
BJU Int; 2017 Nov; 120(5):659-665. PubMed ID: 28370948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Three-Tesla magnetic resonance-guided prostate biopsy in men with increased prostate-specific antigen and repeated, negative, random, systematic, transrectal ultrasound biopsies: detection of clinically significant prostate cancers.
Hoeks CM; Schouten MG; Bomers JG; Hoogendoorn SP; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Hambrock T; Vergunst H; Sedelaar JP; Fütterer JJ; Barentsz JO
Eur Urol; 2012 Nov; 62(5):902-9. PubMed ID: 22325447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. MRI-guided focused ultrasound surgery for uterine fibroid treatment: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Kong CY; Meng L; Omer ZB; Swan JS; Srouji S; Gazelle GS; Fennessy FM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Aug; 203(2):361-71. PubMed ID: 25055272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Prostate Cancer Screening in the UK: A Decision Model Analysis Based on the CAP Trial.
Keeney E; Sanghera S; Martin RM; Gulati R; Wiklund F; Walsh EI; Donovan JL; Hamdy F; Neal DE; Lane JA; Turner EL; Thom H; Clements MS
Pharmacoeconomics; 2022 Dec; 40(12):1207-1220. PubMed ID: 36201131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.
Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Drost FH; van Leenders GJ; Bokhorst LP; Bangma CH; Schoots IG
BJU Int; 2017 Oct; 120(4):511-519. PubMed ID: 28267899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Venetoclax in Combination with Azacitidine Versus Azacitidine Monotherapy in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who are Ineligible for Intensive Chemotherapy: From a US Third Party Payer Perspective.
Pratz KW; Chai X; Xie J; Yin L; Nie X; Montez M; Iantuono E; Downs L; Ma E
Pharmacoeconomics; 2022 Aug; 40(8):777-790. PubMed ID: 35696071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Cost-effectiveness of a hypothetical cell or gene therapy cure for sickle cell disease.
Salcedo J; Bulovic J; Young CM
Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):10838. PubMed ID: 34035408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Cost-effectiveness of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab vs Sorafenib for Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Zhang X; Wang J; Shi J; Jia X; Dang S; Wang W
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Apr; 4(4):e214846. PubMed ID: 33825837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Multi-gene Pharmacogenomic Testing That Includes Decision-Support Tools to Guide Medication Selection for Major Depression: A Health Technology Assessment.
Ontario Health (Quality)
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2021; 21(13):1-214. PubMed ID: 34484487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Cost-Effectiveness of Population-Based Multigene Testing for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Prevention.
Guo F; Adekanmbi V; Hsu CD; Berenson AB; Kuo YF; Shih YT
JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Feb; 7(2):e2356078. PubMed ID: 38353949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Cost-effectiveness of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and targeted biopsy in diagnosing prostate cancer.
Cerantola Y; Dragomir A; Tanguay S; Bladou F; Aprikian A; Kassouf W
Urol Oncol; 2016 Mar; 34(3):119.e1-9. PubMed ID: 26602178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Optimization of PSA screening policies: a comparison of the patient and societal perspectives.
Zhang J; Denton BT; Balasubramanian H; Shah ND; Inman BA
Med Decis Making; 2012; 32(2):337-49. PubMed ID: 21933990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Second-Line Chemotherapy Agents for Advanced Gastric Cancer.
Lam SW; Wai M; Lau JE; McNamara M; Earl M; Udeh B
Pharmacotherapy; 2017 Jan; 37(1):94-103. PubMed ID: 27870079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Cost effectiveness of moderate to severe psoriasis therapy with etanercept and ustekinumab in the United States.
Villacorta R; Hay JW; Messali A
Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Sep; 31(9):823-39. PubMed ID: 23975739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Prostate Cancer Screening Using Prostate-Specific Antigen Tests in a High-Risk Population in China: A Cost-Utility Analysis.
Qin X; Ye D; Gu C; Huang Y; Gu W; Dai B; Zhang H; Zhu Y; Yang H; Qu S
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp; 2021; 95():100653. PubMed ID: 34917218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Shepherd J; Jones J; Takeda A; Davidson P; Price A
Health Technol Assess; 2006 Aug; 10(28):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-183. PubMed ID: 16904047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Assessment of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naive Men: The Biparametric MRI for Detection of Prostate Cancer (BIDOC) Study.
Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Bisbjerg R; Thestrup KC; Winther MD; Jakobsen H; Thomsen HS
JAMA Netw Open; 2018 Jun; 1(2):e180219. PubMed ID: 30646066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Cost-effective prostate cancer detection. Reduction of low-yield biopsies. Investigators of the American Cancer Society National Prostate Cancer Detection Project.
Littrup PJ; Kane RA; Mettlin CJ; Murphy GP; Lee F; Toi A; Badalament R; Babaian R
Cancer; 1994 Dec; 74(12):3146-58. PubMed ID: 7526969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Prebiopsy Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined with Prostate-specific Antigen Density in Detecting and Ruling out Gleason 7-10 Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-naïve Men.
Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Bisbjerg R; Thestrup KC; Jakobsen H; Thomsen HS
Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 May; 2(3):311-319. PubMed ID: 31200846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
