These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38020249)
41. Profile changes in orthodontic patients treated with mandibular advancement surgery. Tsang ST; McFadden LR; Wiltshire WA; Pershad N; Baker AB Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 19121503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Aesthetic evaluation of the labiolingual position of maxillary lateral incisors by orthodontists and laypersons. Jiang X; Cao Z; Yao Y; Zhao Z; Liao W BMC Oral Health; 2021 Jan; 21(1):42. PubMed ID: 33482798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Influence of occlusal plane inclination and mandibular deviation on esthetics. Corte CC; Silveira BL; Marquezan M Dental Press J Orthod; 2015 Oct; 20(5):50-7. PubMed ID: 26560821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Do various degrees of tooth decalcification affect orthodontists', general dentists' and laypersons' ratings of smile esthetics? Al-Omari I; Al-Bitar Z; Hamdan AM Angle Orthod; 2020 May; 90(3):405-410. PubMed ID: 33378442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. A comparative assessment of the perception of Chinese facial profile esthetics. Soh J; Chew MT; Wong HB Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jun; 127(6):692-9. PubMed ID: 15953894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Three-dimensional investigation of facial surface asymmetries in skeletal malocclusion patients before and after orthodontic treatment combined with orthognathic surgery. Blockhaus M; Kochel J; Hartmann J; Stellzig-Eisenhauer A; Meyer-Marcotty P J Orofac Orthop; 2014 Mar; 75(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 24577016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Subjective and objective evaluation of frontal smile esthetics in patients with facial asymmetry-a comparative cross-sectional study. Singh H; Maurya RK; Kapoor P; Sharma P; Srivastava D Orthod Craniofac Res; 2017 Feb; 20(1):8-20. PubMed ID: 27862935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Association between ratings of facial attractivess and patients' motivation for orthognathic surgery. Vargo JK; Gladwin M; Ngan P Orthod Craniofac Res; 2003 Feb; 6(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 12627797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Perceptions of laypersons and orthodontists regarding the buccal corridor in long- and short-face individuals. Zange SE; Ramos AL; Cuoghi OA; de Mendonça MR; Suguino R Angle Orthod; 2011 Jan; 81(1):86-90. PubMed ID: 20936959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Influence of facial pattern in smile attractiveness regarding gingival exposure assessed by dentists and laypersons. Lima APB; Conti ACCF; Filho LC; Cardoso MA; Almeida-Pedrin RR Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Feb; 155(2):224-233. PubMed ID: 30712694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Perception of smile esthetics among Indian dental professionals and laypersons. Kumar S; Gandhi S; Valiathan A Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):295. PubMed ID: 22945732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Comparing esthetic smile perceptions among laypersons with and without orthodontic treatment experience and dentists. An SM; Choi SY; Chung YW; Jang TH; Kang KH Korean J Orthod; 2014 Nov; 44(6):294-303. PubMed ID: 25473645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. What do black patients expect from orthodontic treatment? The aesthetic perception of facial profile between orthodontists and black laypersons. Souza DB; Oliveira AI; Gouvêa GR; Santamaria-Jr M Dental Press J Orthod; 2022; 27(4):e2220519. PubMed ID: 36074432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Assessment of the perception of smile esthetics by laypersons, dental students and dental practitioners. Cracel-Nogueira F; Pinho T Int Orthod; 2013 Dec; 11(4):432-44. PubMed ID: 24427802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Patient- and clinician-perceived need for orthognathic surgery. Juggins KJ; Nixon F; Cunningham SJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):697-702. PubMed ID: 16360908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Professionals' and laypersons' appreciation of various options for Class III surgical correction. Fabré M; Mossaz C; Christou P; Kiliaridis S Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):395-402. PubMed ID: 19901039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Esthetic Assessment of the Effect of Gingival Exposure in the Smile of Patients with Unilateral and Bilateral Maxillary Incisor Agenesis. Pinho T; Bellot-Arcís C; Montiel-Company JM; Neves M J Prosthodont; 2015 Jul; 24(5):366-72. PubMed ID: 25220205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Factors influencing the perception of profile beauty in Class III dental compensation: A comparative cross-sectional study according to three categories of assessors. El Khoury K; Ghoubril J; Kassis A; Khoury E Int Orthod; 2023 Sep; 21(3):100784. PubMed ID: 37331196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Centric relation: a survey study to determine whether a consensus exists between oral and maxillofacial surgeons and orthodontists. Truitt J; Strauss RA; Best A J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 May; 67(5):1058-61. PubMed ID: 19375018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Likert scale vs visual analog scale for assessing facial pleasantness. Dourado GB; Volpato GH; de Almeida-Pedrin RR; Pedron Oltramari PV; Freire Fernandes TM; de Castro Ferreira Conti AC Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Dec; 160(6):844-852. PubMed ID: 34593260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]