These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38020249)
61. Esthetic evaluation of the facial profile in rehabilitated adults with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate. Ferrari Júnior FM; Ayub PV; Capelozza Filho L; Pereira Lauris JR; Garib DG J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 73(1):169.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25511967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Esthetic preferences of orthodontists, dentists, and plastic surgeons for balanced facial profiles. Milutinovic J; Aleksic E; Avramov S; Kalevski K; Gajic M; Pejanovic D; Milic J J Oral Sci; 2023 Mar; 65(2):73-76. PubMed ID: 36823034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Influence of Smile Arc and Buccal Corridors on Facial Attractiveness: A Cross-sectional Study. Gaikwad S; Kaur H; Vaz AC; Singh B; Taneja L; Vinod KS; Verma P J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Sep; 10(9):ZC20-ZC23. PubMed ID: 27790573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Influence of symmetric and asymmetric alterations of maxillary canine gingival margin on the perception of smile esthetics among orthodontists, dentists, and laypersons. Katiyar S; Gandhi S; Sodawala J; Anita G; Hamdani S; Jain S Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(6):586-591. PubMed ID: 28169254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Esthetic dental perception comparisons between 2D- and 3D-simulated dental discrepancies. Revilla-León M; Campbell HE; Meyer MJ; Umorin M; Sones A; Zandinejad A J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):763-773. PubMed ID: 31982145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Assessing the influence of chin prominence on profile esthetics: A survey study. Pişiren AB; Arman-Özçırpıcı A; Tunçer Nİ J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Apr; 46(4):628-634. PubMed ID: 29506888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Perception of Smile Esthetics by Orthodontists and Laypersons: Full Face and A Localized View of The Social and Spontaneous Smiles. Dindaroğlu F; Ertan Erdinç AM; Doğan S Turk J Orthod; 2016 Sep; 29(3):59-68. PubMed ID: 30112476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Effect of increasing occlusal vertical dimension on lower facial form and perceived facial esthetics: A digital evaluation. Sun J; Lin YC; Lee JD; Lee SJ J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Oct; 126(4):546-552. PubMed ID: 32981714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Perceptions of dental professionals and laypersons to altered dental esthetics: asymmetric and symmetric situations. Kokich VO; Kokich VG; Kiyak HA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Aug; 130(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 16905057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Self-perception of facial esthetics by patients with different profiles compared with assessments of orthodontists and lay people. Volpato GH; de Almeida-Pedrin RR; Oltramari PVP; Freire Fernandes TM; de Almeida MR; de Castro Ferreira Conti AC Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Dec; 158(6):840-848. PubMed ID: 33256916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Perceptions of Pre- to Postsurgical Profile Changes in Orthognathic Surgery Patients and Their Correlation with Photogrammetric Changes: A Panel Study. Sari-Rieger A; Rustemeyer J J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2015 Sep; 14(3):765-72. PubMed ID: 26225075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. The transverse occlusal plane rated by laypersons, orthodontists, and oral and maxillofacial surgeons. Tanaka OM; Bark MJ; Gasparello GG; Hartmann GC Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 Sep; 164(3):310-311. PubMed ID: 37634928 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
73. Dental esthetics and quality of life in adults with severe malocclusion before and after treatment. Silvola AS; Varimo M; Tolvanen M; Rusanen J; Lahti S; Pirttiniemi P Angle Orthod; 2014 Jul; 84(4):594-9. PubMed ID: 24308529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Smile preferences of orthodontists, general dentists, patients, and the general public in three-quarter and lateral views. Pasukdee P; Cheng JH; Chen DS Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Apr; 159(4):e311-e320. PubMed ID: 33568274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Orthodontists' and laypersons' aesthetic assessment of Class III subjects referred for orthognathic surgery. Fabré M; Mossaz C; Christou P; Kiliaridis S Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 19395371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Perception differences of altered dental esthetics by dental professionals and laypersons. Thomas M; Reddy R; Reddy BJ Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):242-7. PubMed ID: 21891893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Assessing the influence of asymmeftry affecting the mandible and chin point on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, clinician, and layperson. Naini FB; Donaldson AN; McDonald F; Cobourne MT J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 70(1):192-206. PubMed ID: 21571417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Esthetic evaluation of facial cheek volume: A study using 3D stereophotogrammetry. Feng J; Yu H; Yin Y; Yan Y; Wang Z; Bai D; Han X Angle Orthod; 2019 Jan; 89(1):129-137. PubMed ID: 30324805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Influence of facial type on attractiveness of vertical canine position from the perspective of orthodontists and laypeople. Acar YB; Abuhan E; Boyacıyan R; Özdemir F Angle Orthod; 2022 Mar; 92(2):233-239. PubMed ID: 34652426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Morphological Simulation of Different Incisal Embrasures: Perception of Laypersons, Orthodontic Patients, General Dentists and Orthodontists. Eduarda Assad Duarte M; Martins Machado R; Fonseca Jardim da Motta A; Nelson Mucha J; Trindade Motta A J Esthet Restor Dent; 2017 Feb; 29(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 27767236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]