These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38021238)
1. ERP evidence of attentional somatosensory processing and stimulus-response coupling under different hand and arm postures. Kida T; Kaneda T; Nishihira Y Front Hum Neurosci; 2023; 17():1252686. PubMed ID: 38021238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adaptive flexibility of the within-hand attentional gradient in touch: An MEG study. Kida T; Tanaka E; Kakigi R Neuroimage; 2018 Oct; 179():373-384. PubMed ID: 29936309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differential modulation of temporal and frontal components of the somatosensory N140 and the effect of interstimulus interval in a selective attention task. Kida T; Nishihira Y; Wasaka T; Nakata H; Sakamoto M Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Mar; 19(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 14972356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modulation of somatosensory processing in dual tasks: an event-related brain potential study. Kida T; Kaneda T; Nishihira Y Exp Brain Res; 2012 Feb; 216(4):575-84. PubMed ID: 22120159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relationships between attention effects and intensity effects on the cognitive N140 and P300 components of somatosensory ERPs. Nakajima Y; Imamura N Clin Neurophysiol; 2000 Oct; 111(10):1711-8. PubMed ID: 11018484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Event-Related Brain Potentials N140 and P300 during Somatosensory Go/NoGo Tasks Are Modulated by Movement Preparation. Matsuda Y; Sugawara Y; Akaiwa M; Saito H; Shibata E; Sasaki T; Sugawara K Brain Sci; 2023 Dec; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 38248253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Age-related loss in attention-based modulation of tactile stimuli at early stages of somatosensory processing. Bolton DA; Staines WR Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jun; 50(7):1502-13. PubMed ID: 22406692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Changes in the somatosensory N250 and P300 by the variation of reaction time. Kida T; Nishihira Y; Hatta A; Wasaka T; Nakata H; Sakamoto M; Nakajima T Eur J Appl Physiol; 2003 May; 89(3-4):326-30. PubMed ID: 12736841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Crossing the hands disrupts tactile spatial attention but not motor attention: evidence from event-related potentials. Gherri E; Forster B Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jul; 50(9):2303-16. PubMed ID: 22683449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of hand posture on preparatory control processes and sensory modulations in tactile-spatial attention. Eimer M; Forster B; Fieger A; Harbich S Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Mar; 115(3):596-608. PubMed ID: 15036056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Viewing the body modulates neural mechanisms underlying sustained spatial attention in touch. Sambo CF; Gillmeister H; Forster B Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jul; 30(1):143-50. PubMed ID: 19519638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The relationship between reaction time and response variability and somatosensory No-go potentials. Nakata H; Sakamoto K; Kakigi R Eur J Appl Physiol; 2012 Jan; 112(1):207-14. PubMed ID: 21519888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cross-modal links in endogenous spatial attention are mediated by common external locations: evidence from event-related brain potentials. Eimer M; Cockburn D; Smedley B; Driver J Exp Brain Res; 2001 Aug; 139(4):398-411. PubMed ID: 11534863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Resource allocation and somatosensory P300 amplitude during dual task: effects of tracking speed and predictability of tracking direction. Kida T; Nishihira Y; Hatta A; Wasaka T; Tazoe T; Sakajiri Y; Nakata H; Kaneda T; Kuroiwa K; Akiyama S; Sakamoto M; Kamijo K; Higashiura T Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Nov; 115(11):2616-28. PubMed ID: 15465451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. On the spread of spatial attention in touch: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Gherri E; White F; Venables E Biol Psychol; 2023 Mar; 178():108544. PubMed ID: 36931591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Somatosensory N250 and P300 during discrimination tasks. Kida T; Nishihira Y; Hatta A; Wasaka T Int J Psychophysiol; 2003 Jun; 48(3):275-83. PubMed ID: 12798987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of task repetition on event-related potentials in somatosensory Go/No-go paradigm. Nakata H; Sakamoto K; Kakigi R Neurosci Lett; 2015 May; 594():82-6. PubMed ID: 25817359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Visual and spatial modulation of tactile extinction: behavioural and electrophysiological evidence. Sambo CF; Vallar G; Fortis P; Ronchi R; Posteraro L; Forster B; Maravita A Front Hum Neurosci; 2012; 6():217. PubMed ID: 22848197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Attentional modulation of the human somatosensory evoked potential in a trial-by-trial spatial cueing and sustained spatial attention task measured with high density 128 channels EEG. Zopf R; Giabbiconi CM; Gruber T; Müller MM Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Aug; 20(3):491-509. PubMed ID: 15268926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]