These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38021238)

  • 21. Passive enhancement of the somatosensory P100 and N140 in an active attention task using deviant alone condition.
    Kida T; Nishihira Y; Wasaka T; Nakata H; Sakamoto M
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Apr; 115(4):871-9. PubMed ID: 15003768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Response compatibility and the relationship between event-related potentials and the timing of a motor response.
    Goodin DS; Aminoff MJ; Chequer RS; Ortiz TA
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Dec; 76(6):3705-13. PubMed ID: 8985868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Transient inhibition of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex disrupts attention-based modulation of tactile stimuli at early stages of somatosensory processing.
    Bolton DA; Staines WR
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1928-37. PubMed ID: 21439987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Characteristics of No-go-P300 component during somatosensory Go/No-go paradigms.
    Nakata H; Sakamoto K; Kakigi R
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Jul; 478(3):124-7. PubMed ID: 20452400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The spatial distribution of attentional selectivity in touch: evidence from somatosensory ERP components.
    Eimer M; Forster B
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2003 Jul; 114(7):1298-306. PubMed ID: 12842729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of stimulus intensity and auditory white noise on human somatosensory cognitive processing: a study using event-related potentials.
    Mizukami H; Kakigi R; Nakata H
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Feb; 237(2):521-530. PubMed ID: 30474688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An ERP investigation on visuotactile interactions in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: evidence for the spatial rule.
    Sambo CF; Forster B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1550-9. PubMed ID: 18767919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The electrophysiological time course of somatosensory spatial remapping: vision of the hands modulates effects of posture on somatosensory evoked potentials.
    Rigato S; Bremner AJ; Mason L; Pickering A; Davis R; van Velzen J
    Eur J Neurosci; 2013 Sep; 38(6):2884-92. PubMed ID: 23834749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of attentional dispersion on sensory-motor processing of anticipatory postural control during unilateral arm abduction.
    Yaguchi C; Fujiwara K
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 Jul; 123(7):1361-70. PubMed ID: 22119174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Attentional modulation of the nociceptive processing into the human brain: selective spatial attention, probability of stimulus occurrence, and target detection effects on laser evoked potentials.
    Legrain V; Guérit JM; Bruyer R; Plaghki L
    Pain; 2002 Sep; 99(1-2):21-39. PubMed ID: 12237181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Centrifugal regulation of a task-relevant somatosensory signal triggering voluntary movement without a preceding warning signal.
    Kida T; Wasaka T; Nakata H; Akatsuka K; Kakigi R
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Sep; 173(4):733-41. PubMed ID: 16636794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Different Patterns of Attention Modulation in Early N140 and Late P300 sERPs Following Ipsilateral vs. Contralateral Stimulation at the Fingers and Cheeks.
    Lindenbaum L; Zehe S; Anlauff J; Hermann T; Kissler JM
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2021; 15():781778. PubMed ID: 34938169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Probability and interstimulus interval effects on the N140 and the P300 components of somatosensory erps.
    Nakajima Y; Imamura N
    Int J Neurosci; 2000; 104(1-4):75-91. PubMed ID: 11011975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Early modality-specific somatosensory cortical regions are modulated by attended visual stimuli: interaction of vision, touch and behavioral intent.
    Staines WR; Popovich C; Legon JK; Adams MS
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():351. PubMed ID: 24795684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Test-retest reliability of concurrently recorded steady-state and somatosensory evoked potentials in somatosensory sustained spatial attention.
    Pang CY; Mueller MM
    Biol Psychol; 2014 Jul; 100():86-96. PubMed ID: 24911551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The attentional selection of spatial and non-spatial attributes in touch: ERP evidence for parallel and independent processes.
    Forster B; Eimer M
    Biol Psychol; 2004 Mar; 66(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 15019167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Somatosensory event-related potentials following different stimulus conditions.
    Ito J; Shibasaki H; Kimura J
    Int J Neurosci; 1992; 65(1-4):239-46. PubMed ID: 1341686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Somatosensory off-response in humans: an ERP study.
    Yamashiro K; Inui K; Otsuru N; Kida T; Akatsuka K; Kakigi R
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 190(2):207-13. PubMed ID: 18584160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Gating at early cortical processing stages is associated with changes in behavioural performance on a sensory conflict task.
    Adams MS; Popovich C; Staines WR
    Behav Brain Res; 2017 Jan; 317():179-187. PubMed ID: 27641325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Modulations of early somatosensory ERP components by transient and sustained spatial attention.
    Eimer M; Forster B
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Jul; 151(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 12756516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.