These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38021306)

  • 1. Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Thai Version of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form in Patients With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury.
    Kerdtho T; Lertwanich P
    Orthop J Sports Med; 2023 Nov; 11(11):23259671231210321. PubMed ID: 38021306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cutoff Value for the Patient Acceptable Symptom State of the Thai IKDC Subjective Knee Form in Patients After Primary ACL Reconstruction.
    Piamthipmanas T; Lertwanich P; Ganokroj P; Vanadurongwan B; Keyurapan E; Lamsam C
    Orthop J Sports Med; 2022 Aug; 10(8):23259671221113880. PubMed ID: 36003967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preoperative Short Form Health Survey Score Is Predictive of Return to Play and Minimal Clinically Important Difference at a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
    Nwachukwu BU; Chang B; Voleti PB; Berkanish P; Cohn MR; Altchek DW; Allen AA; Williams RJ
    Am J Sports Med; 2017 Oct; 45(12):2784-2790. PubMed ID: 28727937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Responsiveness of the Indonesian Versions of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport After Injury Score, the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form, and the Lysholm Score in Patients With ACL Injury.
    Deviandri R; van der Veen HC; Lubis AM; Postma MJ; van den Akker-Scheek I
    Orthop J Sports Med; 2023 Aug; 11(8):23259671231191827. PubMed ID: 37655253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Defining Thresholds for the Patient Acceptable Symptom State for the IKDC Subjective Knee Form and KOOS for Patients Who Underwent ACL Reconstruction.
    Muller B; Yabroudi MA; Lynch A; Lai CL; van Dijk CN; Fu FH; Irrgang JJ
    Am J Sports Med; 2016 Nov; 44(11):2820-2826. PubMed ID: 27474383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation and defining the minimal clinically important difference of the Japanese version of the IKDC Subjective Knee Form.
    Huang H; Nagao M; Arita H; Nishio H; Kaneko H; Saita Y; Ishijima M; Takazawa Y; Ikeda H; Kaneko K
    J Orthop Sci; 2021 Jan; 26(1):149-155. PubMed ID: 32340786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Determining the Substantial Clinical Benefit Values for Patient-Reported Outcome Scores After Primary ACL Reconstruction.
    Jeon YS; Lee JW; Kim SH; Kim SG; Kim YH; Bae JH
    Orthop J Sports Med; 2022 May; 10(5):23259671221091795. PubMed ID: 35547609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Responsiveness of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form in comparison to the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, modified Cincinnati Knee Rating System, and Short Form 36 in patients with focal articular cartilage defects.
    Greco NJ; Anderson AF; Mann BJ; Cole BJ; Farr J; Nissen CW; Irrgang JJ
    Am J Sports Med; 2010 May; 38(5):891-902. PubMed ID: 20044494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Choice of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Midterm Assessment After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery.
    Webster KE; Klemm HJ; Feller JA
    Am J Sports Med; 2022 Jul; 50(8):2119-2124. PubMed ID: 35604331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Standard and Right/Left International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form Scores.
    Magnuson JA; Strnad G; Smith C; Jones MH; Saluan P; Irrgang JJ; Spindler KP
    Am J Sports Med; 2019 Apr; 47(5):1203-1208. PubMed ID: 30896976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of the KOOS
    Jacobs CA; Peabody MR; Lattermann C; Vega JF; Huston LJ; Spindler KP; ; Amendola A; Andrish JT; Brophy RH; Dunn WR; Flanigan DC; Jones MH; Kaeding CC; Marx RG; Matava MJ; McCarty EC; Parker RD; Reinke EK; Wolcott ML; Wolf BR; Wright RW; Vidal AF
    Am J Sports Med; 2018 Oct; 46(12):2915-2921. PubMed ID: 30074823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Femoral Nerve Blockade Does Not Lead to Subjective Functional Deficits After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
    Patzkowski MS; Scott DrAP MAJSS; Patzkowski JC; Highland KB
    Mil Med; 2022 May; 187(5-6):e644-e648. PubMed ID: 34244804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing the Responsiveness of the Global Rating Scale With Legacy Knee Outcome Scores: A Delaware-Oslo Cohort Study.
    Johnson JL; Irrgang JJ; Risberg MA; Snyder-Mackler L
    Am J Sports Med; 2020 Jul; 48(8):1953-1960. PubMed ID: 32515989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changes in subjective knee function and psychological status from preoperation to 6 months post anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
    Ohji S; Aizawa J; Hirohata K; Ohmi T; Mitomo S; Koga H; Yagishita K
    J Exp Orthop; 2022 Dec; 9(1):114. PubMed ID: 36454346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurement properties of the German version of the IKDC subjective knee form (IKDC-SKF).
    Kümmel D; Preiss S; Harder LP; Leunig M; Impellizzeri FM
    J Patient Rep Outcomes; 2018 Dec; 2():31. PubMed ID: 30294711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Primary Repair of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Structures to Reconstruction and Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis at 2-Year Follow-up.
    Ferretti A; Carrozzo A; Saithna A; Argento G; Annibaldi A; Latini F; Schirò A; Marzilli F; Monaco E
    Am J Sports Med; 2023 Jul; 51(9):2300-2312. PubMed ID: 37350021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A bifactor model supports unidimensionality of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form in young active patients with anterior cruciate ligament tears: a retrospective analysis of a randomized controlled trial.
    Marmura H; Tremblay PF; Getgood AMJ; Bryant DM
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2023 Sep; 21(1):104. PubMed ID: 37697331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rationale for a Parsimonious Measure of Subjective Knee Function Among Individuals With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Rasch Analysis.
    Duckett T; Fox CM; Hart JM; Norte GE
    J Athl Train; 2021 Dec; 56(12):1340-1348. PubMed ID: 34911070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bridge-Enhanced Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair Is Not Inferior to Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction at 2 Years: Results of a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Murray MM; Fleming BC; Badger GJ; ; Freiberger C; Henderson R; Barnett S; Kiapour A; Ecklund K; Proffen B; Sant N; Kramer DE; Micheli LJ; Yen YM
    Am J Sports Med; 2020 May; 48(6):1305-1315. PubMed ID: 32298131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anterior and Rotational Knee Laxity Does Not Affect Patient-Reported Knee Function 2 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
    Magnussen R; Reinke EK; Huston LJ; ; Andrish JT; Cox CL; Dunn WR; Flanigan DC; Hewett T; Jones MH; Kaeding CC; Lorring D; Matava MJ; Parker RD; Pedroza A; Preston E; Richardson B; Schroeder B; Smith MV; Wright RW; Spindler KP
    Am J Sports Med; 2019 Jul; 47(9):2077-2085. PubMed ID: 31307221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.