167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38023150)
41. Impact of peritoneal vaginoplasty combined with radical hysterectomy on the quality of sexual life for patients with early-stage cervical cancer: trial protocol for a multi-center superiority randomized controlled trial.
Yang S; Ding Y; Li H; Wu S; Feng W; Wang Y; Wang X; Hua K
J Gynecol Oncol; 2024 May; 35(3):e23. PubMed ID: 38037548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Impact of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy on survival outcome in patients with FIGO stage IB cervical cancer: A matching study of two institutional hospitals in Korea.
Kim SI; Lee M; Lee S; Suh DH; Kim HS; Kim K; Chung HH; No JH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Kim YB
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Oct; 155(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 31383569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Comparison between laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 and tumor size <2 cm cervical cancer with visible or invisible tumors: a multicentre retrospective study.
Li P; Chen L; Ni Y; Liu J; Li D; Guo J; Liu Z; Jin S; Xu Y; Li Z; Wang L; Bin X; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
J Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Mar; 32(2):e17. PubMed ID: 33470062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a multicenter study in China.
Hu TWY; Huang Y; Li N; Nie D; Li Z
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Aug; 30(8):1143-1150. PubMed ID: 32571892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Regional trends of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer and exploration of perioperative outcomes.
Holtzman S; Chaoul J; Finkelstein M; Kolev V; Zakashansky K
Cancer Epidemiol; 2022 Apr; 77():102095. PubMed ID: 35078009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Effect of transcutaneous electrical stimulation treatment on lower urinary tract symptoms after class III radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients: study protocol for a multicentre, randomized controlled trial.
Sun XL; Wang HB; Wang ZQ; Cao TT; Yang X; Han JS; Wu YF; Reilly KH; Wang JL
BMC Cancer; 2017 Jun; 17(1):416. PubMed ID: 28619043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Comparison of abdominal and minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer.
Kim SI; Lee J; Hong J; Lee SJ; Park DC; Yoon JH
Int J Med Sci; 2021; 18(5):1312-1317. PubMed ID: 33526992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. A comparison of stages IB1 and IB2 cervical cancers treated with radical hysterectomy. Is size the real difference?
Rutledge TL; Kamelle SA; Tillmanns TD; Gould NS; Wright JD; Cohn DE; Herzog TJ; Rader JS; Gold MA; Johnson GA; Walker JL; Mannel RS; McMeekin DS
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Oct; 95(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 15385112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Vaginal-assisted gasless laparoendoscopic single-site radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer: a retrospective pilot study.
Wang X; Li J; Hua K; Chen Y
World J Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 19(1):288. PubMed ID: 34579736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Conization before radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: A Korean multicenter study (COBRA-R).
Kim SI; Nam SH; Hwangbo S; Kim Y; Cho HW; Suh DH; Song JY; Kim JW; Choi CH; Kim DY; Lee M
Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Jun; 173():88-97. PubMed ID: 37105062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤ 2 cm: a case-matched control study.
Chen C; Liu P; Ni Y; Tang L; Xu Y; Bin X; Lang J
Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 May; 25(5):937-947. PubMed ID: 32062731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Comparison of survival outcomes between laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A French multicentric study.
Zaccarini F; Santy A; Dabi Y; Lavoue V; Carcopino X; Bendifallah S; Benbara A; Collinet P; Canlorbe G; Raimond E; Graesslin O; Ouldamer L; Daraï E; Huchon C; Golfier F; Touboul C; Bolze PA
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2021 Feb; 50(2):102046. PubMed ID: 33340751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Oncologic results and surgical morbidity of laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in the treatment of FIGO stage IB cervical cancer: long-term follow-up.
Park NY; Chong GO; Hong DG; Cho YL; Park IS; Lee YS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2011 Feb; 21(2):355-62. PubMed ID: 21270616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Patterns of recurrence after laparoscopic versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.
Bogani G; Ghezzi F; Chiva L; Gisone B; Pinelli C; Dell'Acqua A; Casarin J; Ditto A; Raspagliesi F
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jul; 30(7):987-992. PubMed ID: 32448809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer patients without adjuvant treatment: Ancillary analysis of a Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group Study (KGOG 1028).
Paik ES; Lim MC; Kim MH; Kim YH; Song ES; Seong SJ; Suh DH; Lee JM; Lee C; Choi CH
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Sep; 154(3):547-553. PubMed ID: 31272738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Comparison of Robotic and laparoscopic Radical type-B and C hysterectomy for cervical cancer: Long term-outcomes.
Pellegrino A; Damiani GR; Loverro M; Pirovano C; Fachechi G; Corso S; Trojano G
Acta Biomed; 2017 Oct; 88(3):289-296. PubMed ID: 29083333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Comparison of oncological outcomes and major complications between laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer with a tumour size less than 2 cm.
Li Z; Chen C; Liu P; Duan H; Liu M; Xu Y; Li P; Zhang W; Jiang H; Bin X; Lang J
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Aug; 47(8):2125-2133. PubMed ID: 33781626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. SUCCOR study: an international European cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer.
Chiva L; Zanagnolo V; Querleu D; Martin-Calvo N; Arévalo-Serrano J; Căpîlna ME; Fagotti A; Kucukmetin A; Mom C; Chakalova G; Aliyev S; Malzoni M; Narducci F; Arencibia O; Raspagliesi F; Toptas T; Cibula D; Kaidarova D; Meydanli MM; Tavares M; Golub D; Perrone AM; Poka R; Tsolakidis D; Vujić G; Jedryka MA; Zusterzeel PLM; Beltman JJ; Goffin F; Haidopoulos D; Haller H; Jach R; Yezhova I; Berlev I; Bernardino M; Bharathan R; Lanner M; Maenpaa MM; Sukhin V; Feron JG; Fruscio R; Kukk K; Ponce J; Minguez JA; Vázquez-Vicente D; Castellanos T; Chacon E; Alcazar JL;
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Sep; 30(9):1269-1277. PubMed ID: 32788262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. How to Select Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Patients Still Suitable for Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy: a Propensity-Matched Study.
Pedone Anchora L; Turco LC; Bizzarri N; Capozzi VA; Lombisani A; Chiantera V; De Felice F; Gallotta V; Cosentino F; Fagotti A; Ferrandina G; Scambia G
Ann Surg Oncol; 2020 Jun; 27(6):1947-1955. PubMed ID: 31898100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
