147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38023255)
1. Prospective assessment of breast lesions AI classification model based on ultrasound dynamic videos and ACR BI-RADS characteristics.
Qiu S; Zhuang S; Li B; Wang J; Zhuang Z
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1274557. PubMed ID: 38023255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective study of AI-assisted prediction of breast malignancies in physical health examinations: role of off-the-shelf AI software and comparison to radiologist performance.
Ma S; Li Y; Yin J; Niu Q; An Z; Du L; Li F; Gu J
Front Oncol; 2024; 14():1374278. PubMed ID: 38756651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Application of ultrasound artificial intelligence in the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant breast lesions of BI-RADS 4A.
Niu S; Huang J; Li J; Liu X; Wang D; Zhang R; Wang Y; Shen H; Qi M; Xiao Y; Guan M; Liu H; Li D; Liu F; Wang X; Xiong Y; Gao S; Wang X; Zhu J
BMC Cancer; 2020 Oct; 20(1):959. PubMed ID: 33008320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Artificial Intelligence in BI-RADS Categorization of Breast Lesions on Ultrasound: Can We Omit Excessive Follow-ups and Biopsies?
Guldogan N; Taskin F; Icten GE; Yilmaz E; Turk EB; Erdemli S; Parlakkilic UT; Turkoglu O; Aribal E
Acad Radiol; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38087719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automation Bias in Mammography: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence BI-RADS Suggestions on Reader Performance.
Dratsch T; Chen X; Rezazade Mehrizi M; Kloeckner R; Mähringer-Kunz A; Püsken M; Baeßler B; Sauer S; Maintz D; Pinto Dos Santos D
Radiology; 2023 May; 307(4):e222176. PubMed ID: 37129490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An Artificial Intelligence Model Based on ACR TI-RADS Characteristics for US Diagnosis of Thyroid Nodules.
Chen Y; Gao Z; He Y; Mai W; Li J; Zhou M; Li S; Yi W; Wu S; Bai T; Zhang N; Zeng W; Lu Y; Liu H
Radiology; 2022 Jun; 303(3):613-619. PubMed ID: 35315719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic Performance of Prototype Handheld Ultrasound According to the Fifth Edition of BI-RADS for Breast Ultrasound Compared with Automated Breast Ultrasound among Females with Positive Lumps.
Ibraheem SA; Mahmud R; Mohamad Saini S; Abu Hassan H; Keiteb AS
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Mar; 13(6):. PubMed ID: 36980373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic value of artificial intelligence automatic detection systems for breast BI-RADS 4 nodules.
Lyu SY; Zhang Y; Zhang MW; Zhang BS; Gao LB; Bai LT; Wang J
World J Clin Cases; 2022 Jan; 10(2):518-527. PubMed ID: 35097077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. AI-CAD for differentiating lesions presenting as calcifications only on mammography: outcome analysis incorporating the ACR BI-RADS descriptors for calcifications.
Yoon J; Lee HS; Kim MJ; Park VY; Kim EK; Yoon JH
Eur Radiol; 2022 Oct; 32(10):6565-6574. PubMed ID: 35748900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can artificial intelligence replace ultrasound as a complementary tool to mammogram for the diagnosis of the breast cancer?
Mansour S; Kamal R; Hashem L; AlKalaawy B
Br J Radiol; 2021 Dec; 94(1128):20210820. PubMed ID: 34613796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interobserver variability of ultrasound elastography and the ultrasound BI-RADS lexicon of breast lesions.
Park CS; Kim SH; Jung NY; Choi JJ; Kang BJ; Jung HS
Breast Cancer; 2015 Mar; 22(2):153-60. PubMed ID: 23584596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A deep learning model integrating mammography and clinical factors facilitates the malignancy prediction of BI-RADS 4 microcalcifications in breast cancer screening.
Liu H; Chen Y; Zhang Y; Wang L; Luo R; Wu H; Wu C; Zhang H; Tan W; Yin H; Wang D
Eur Radiol; 2021 Aug; 31(8):5902-5912. PubMed ID: 33496829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Combination of two-dimensional shear wave elastography with ultrasound breast imaging reporting and data system in the diagnosis of breast lesions: a new method to increase the diagnostic performance.
Li DD; Xu HX; Guo LH; Bo XW; Li XL; Wu R; Xu JM; Zhang YF; Zhang K
Eur Radiol; 2016 Sep; 26(9):3290-300. PubMed ID: 26714967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Artificial intelligence breast ultrasound and handheld ultrasound in the BI-RADS categorization of breast lesions: A pilot head to head comparison study in screening program.
Huang X; Qiu Y; Bao F; Wang J; Lin C; Lin Y; Wu J; Yang H
Front Public Health; 2022; 10():1098639. PubMed ID: 36743185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of an automated breast volume scanner according to the fifth edition of BI-RADS for breast ultrasound compared with hand-held ultrasound.
Choi EJ; Choi H; Park EH; Song JS; Youk JH
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Feb; 99():138-145. PubMed ID: 29362145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development and validation of a transformer-based CAD model for improving the consistency of BI-RADS category 3-5 nodule classification among radiologists: a multiple center study.
Ji H; Zhu Q; Ma T; Cheng Y; Zhou S; Ren W; Huang H; He W; Ran H; Ruan L; Guo Y; Tian J; Chen W; Chen L; Wang Z; Zhou Q; Niu L; Zhang W; Yang R; Chen Q; Zhang R; Wang H; Li L; Liu M; Nie F; Zhou A
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2023 Jun; 13(6):3671-3687. PubMed ID: 37284087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Utility of the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS Ultrasound Lexicon in Category 4 Breast Lesions: A Prospective Multicenter Study in China.
Gu Y; Tian JW; Ran HT; Ren WD; Chang C; Yuan JJ; Kang CS; Deng YB; Wang H; Luo BM; Guo SL; Zhou Q; Xue ES; Zhan WW; Zhou Q; Li J; Zhou P; Zhang CQ; Chen M; Gu Y; Xu JF; Chen W; Zhang YH; Wang HQ; Li JC; Wang HY; Jiang YX
Acad Radiol; 2022 Jan; 29 Suppl 1():S26-S34. PubMed ID: 32768352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automatic classification of ultrasound breast lesions using a deep convolutional neural network mimicking human decision-making.
Ciritsis A; Rossi C; Eberhard M; Marcon M; Becker AS; Boss A
Eur Radiol; 2019 Oct; 29(10):5458-5468. PubMed ID: 30927100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Deep Learning-Based Computer-Aided Diagnosis for Breast Lesion Classification on Ultrasound: A Prospective Multicenter Study of Radiologists Without Breast Ultrasound Expertise.
He P; Chen W; Bai MY; Li J; Wang QQ; Fan LH; Zheng J; Liu CT; Zhang XR; Yuan XR; Song PJ; Cui LG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Oct; 221(4):450-459. PubMed ID: 37222275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Gail Model Improves the Diagnostic Performance of the Fifth Edition of Ultrasound BI-RADS for Predicting Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Prospective Study.
Gao LY; Gu Y; Tian JW; Ran HT; Ren WD; Chang C; Yuan JJ; Kang CS; Deng YB; Luo BM; Zhou Q; Zhan WW; Zhou Q; Li J; Zhou P; Zhang CQ; Chen M; Gu Y; Guo JF; Chen W; Zhang YH; Li JC; Wang HY; Jiang YX
Acad Radiol; 2022 Jan; 29 Suppl 1():S1-S7. PubMed ID: 33384211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
