These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3802465)

  • 1. Criteria for evaluating nonquantitative assays: application to serum choriogonadotropin.
    Delfert DM; Rea MR; Kessler G; Siegfried BA; Valdes R
    Clin Chem; 1987 Jan; 33(1):150-3. PubMed ID: 3802465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An evaluation of 10 kits for determination of human choriogonadotropin in serum.
    Rasor JL; Farber S; Braunstein GD
    Clin Chem; 1983 Oct; 29(10):1828-31. PubMed ID: 6616833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Highly sensitive qualitative methods for serum choriogonadotropin (hCG): clinical specificity studies.
    Bandi ZL; Schoen I; DeLara M
    Clin Chem; 1987 May; 33(5):677-81. PubMed ID: 2436832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Immunoassays for quantifying choriogonadotropin compared for assay performance and clinical application.
    Witherspoon LR; Shuler SE; Joseph GF; Baird EF; Neely HR; Sonnemaker RE
    Clin Chem; 1992 Jun; 38(6):887-94. PubMed ID: 1375877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Four rapid serum-urine combination assays of choriogonadotropin (hCG) compared and assessed for their utility in quantitative determinations of hCG.
    Mishalani SH; Seliktar J; Braunstein GD
    Clin Chem; 1994 Oct; 40(10):1944-9. PubMed ID: 7923777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automated and manual quantitative assays of choriogonadotropin in serum compared.
    Beinlich CJ; Carpenter RH
    Clin Chem; 1987 Jan; 33(1):167-9. PubMed ID: 3542289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of five kits for detecting choriogonadotropin in urine.
    Sheehan C; Carreiro E
    Clin Chem; 1985 Jun; 31(6):875-6. PubMed ID: 3995767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three highly sensitive "bedside" serum and urine tests for pregnancy compared.
    Christensen H; Thyssen HH; Schebye O; Berget A
    Clin Chem; 1990 Sep; 36(9):1686-8. PubMed ID: 2208712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Discordant results in human chorionic gonadotropin assays.
    Cole LA; Kardana A
    Clin Chem; 1992 Feb; 38(2):263-70. PubMed ID: 1371722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An algorithm for testing and reporting serum choriogonadotropin at clinically significant decision levels with use of "pregnancy test" reagents.
    Bandi ZL; Schoen I; Waters M
    Clin Chem; 1989 Apr; 35(4):545-51. PubMed ID: 2649272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation and comparison of commercially available pregnancy tests based on monoclonal antibodies to human choriogonadotropin.
    Gelletlie R; Nielsen JB
    Clin Chem; 1986 Dec; 32(12):2166-70. PubMed ID: 3779979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of four enzyme immunoassay kits for serum beta-hCG screening.
    Brown D; Allen LC
    J Immunoassay; 1987; 8(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 2435759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Discordant inter-kit results in the radioimmunoassay for choriogonadotropin in serum.
    Rzasa PJ; Caride VJ; Prokop EK
    Clin Chem; 1984 Jul; 30(7):1240-3. PubMed ID: 6733907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability and feasibility of pregnancy home-use tests: laboratory validation and diagnostic evaluation by 638 volunteers.
    Daviaud J; Fournet D; Ballongue C; Guillem GP; Leblanc A; Casellas C; Pau B
    Clin Chem; 1993 Jan; 39(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 8419058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An evaluation of four serum tests for pregnancy.
    Ryder KW; Munsick RA; Oei TO; Young PC; Blackford HF
    Clin Chem; 1983 Mar; 29(3):561-3. PubMed ID: 6297834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measurement of inaccuracy and imprecision of HCG methods using dilutions of the WHO 4th IS-HCG standard and a pregnant patient's serum.
    Higgins TN; Hanna AN; Hofer TL; Cembrowski GS
    Clin Biochem; 2004 Feb; 37(2):152-4. PubMed ID: 14725948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analytical performance evaluation of the i-STAT Total β-human chorionic gonadotropin immunoassay.
    Sowder AM; Yarbrough ML; Nerenz RD; Mitsios JV; Mortensen R; Gronowski AM; Grenache DG
    Clin Chim Acta; 2015 Jun; 446():165-70. PubMed ID: 25916696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performances of urine pregnancy tests on College of American Pathologists Survey specimens.
    Biesecker JL; Rippey JH
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1981 Oct; 76(4 Suppl):544-6. PubMed ID: 7282640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pathology consultation on human chorionic gonadotropin testing for pregnancy assessment.
    Greene DN; Grenache DG;
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2015 Dec; 144(6):830-6. PubMed ID: 26572988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Choriogonadotropin measured with the Tandem-E immunoenzymetric assay system.
    Bock JL; Furgiuele J; Segen JC
    Clin Chem; 1985 Mar; 31(3):441-4. PubMed ID: 3918810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.