These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3802505)

  • 1. Medical utility frequency.
    Castañeda-Méndez K
    Clin Chem; 1987 Feb; 33(2 Pt 1):221-2. PubMed ID: 3802505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Uncertainty of measurement].
    Giroud C; Arnaud J; Vassault A;
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2010 Dec; 68 Spec No 1():237-45. PubMed ID: 21613020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. General strategies to set quality specifications for reliability performance characteristics.
    Fraser CG
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1999 Nov; 59(7):487-90. PubMed ID: 10667685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Goals for allowable analytic error better based on medical usefulness criteria.
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1986 Mar; 85(3):391-2. PubMed ID: 3751987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The coefficient of analysis, a new figure of merit for laboratory performance.
    Louderback AL; Szatkowski PR
    Clin Chem; 1980 May; 26(6):774-5. PubMed ID: 7371158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality control failures exceeding the weekly limit (QC FEWL): a simple tool to improve assay error detection.
    Kilpatrick ES
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2019 Nov; 56(6):668-673. PubMed ID: 31335159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rhetoric Versus Reality? Laboratory Surveys Show Actual Practice Differs Considerably from Proposed Models and Mandated Calculations.
    Westgard SA
    Clin Lab Med; 2017 Mar; 37(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 28153368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measuring Analytical Quality: Total Analytical Error Versus Measurement Uncertainty.
    Westgard JO; Westgard SA
    Clin Lab Med; 2017 Mar; 37(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 28153359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Allowable measurement error associated with quality management plans.
    Shires GW
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 2013 Feb; 45(2):18, 20. PubMed ID: 24133859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [For an efficient and reasonable accreditation of allergen specific IgE].
    Sarrat A; Brabant S; Charbonnier E; Alyanakian MA; Apoil PA; Bienvenu F; Jaby D; Lainé C; Nicaise-Roland P; Renier G; Sainte-Laudy J; Tabary T; Uring-Lambert B; Vigneron C; Lambert C;
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2013; 71(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 23747670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Verification/validation of the performances of analytical method].
    Vassault A; Hulin A; Chapuzet E; Arnaud J; Giroud C;
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2010 Dec; 68 Spec No 1():247-94. PubMed ID: 21613021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Proposal for the modification of the conventional model for establishing performance specifications.
    Oosterhuis WP; Sandberg S
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2015 May; 53(6):925-37. PubMed ID: 25901717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Domestic and international trends concerning allowable limits of error in external quality assessment scheme].
    Hosogaya S; Ozaki Y
    Rinsho Byori; 2005 Jun; 53(6):547-53. PubMed ID: 16026083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assay Stability, the missing component of the Error Budget.
    Mackay M; Hegedus G; Badrick T
    Clin Biochem; 2017 Dec; 50(18):1136-1144. PubMed ID: 28733188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automated validation of clinical laboratory test results: do we get what we expect?
    De Smet D; Nanos N; Martens GA; Smet L; Damiaens S; Van Moer G; De Pauw A; Jochmans K; De Waele M
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2009; 47(3):379-80. PubMed ID: 19327109
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Preventive screening in two factories. II. Exactitude of laboratory tests and questionnaire (author's transl)].
    Rommel K; Steinhardt B; Uberla K
    Klin Wochenschr; 1976 Dec; 54(24):1177-85. PubMed ID: 1003876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Allowable limits of analytical error which can guarantee the reliability of reference intervals for interpretation of clinical laboratory data].
    Hosogaya S; Ozaki Y
    Rinsho Byori; 2008 Jul; 56(7):617-21. PubMed ID: 18709995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Result, error and uncertainty.
    Dybkaer R
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1995 Apr; 55(2):97-118. PubMed ID: 7667613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Some nonparametric statistical tests for quick evaluation of clinical data.
    Gindler EM
    Clin Chem; 1975 Mar; 21(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 1112039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Statistical evaluation of method-comparison data.
    Wu GT; Twomey SL; Thiers RE
    Clin Chem; 1975 Mar; 21(3):315-20. PubMed ID: 1112040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.