These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38026040)

  • 21. The continuing misuse of null hypothesis significance testing in biological anthropology.
    Smith RJ
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2018 May; 166(1):236-245. PubMed ID: 29345299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An Introduction to Calculating Bayes Factors in JASP for Speech, Language, and Hearing Research.
    Brydges CR; Gaeta L
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Dec; 62(12):4523-4533. PubMed ID: 31830850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Moving Beyond p < 0.05 in Ecotoxicology: A Guide for Practitioners.
    Erickson RA; Rattner BA
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2020 Sep; 39(9):1657-1669. PubMed ID: 32539165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Statistics in ophthalmology revisited: the (effect) size matters.
    Grzybowski A; Mianowany M
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2018 Nov; 96(7):e885-e888. PubMed ID: 30187631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. How to Choose between Different Bayesian Posterior Indices for Hypothesis Testing in Practice.
    Kelter R
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(1):160-188. PubMed ID: 34582284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Why we habitually engage in null-hypothesis significance testing: A qualitative study.
    Stunt J; van Grootel L; Bouter L; Trafimow D; Hoekstra T; de Boer M
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0258330. PubMed ID: 34653185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Equivalence versus classical statistical tests in water quality assessments.
    Ngatia M; Gonzalez D; San Julian S; Conner A
    J Environ Monit; 2010 Jan; 12(1):172-7. PubMed ID: 20082011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluating statistical difference, equivalence, and indeterminacy using inferential confidence intervals: an integrated alternative method of conducting null hypothesis statistical tests.
    Tryon WW
    Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):371-86. PubMed ID: 11778678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. When Null Hypothesis Significance Testing Is Unsuitable for Research: A Reassessment.
    Szucs D; Ioannidis JPA
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2017; 11():390. PubMed ID: 28824397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Statistical inferences under the Null hypothesis: common mistakes and pitfalls in neuroimaging studies.
    Hupé JM
    Front Neurosci; 2015; 9():18. PubMed ID: 25745383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Complementing the P-value from null-hypothesis significance testing with a Bayes factor from null-hypothesis Bayesian testing.
    Malone HE; Coyne I
    Nurse Res; 2020 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 33150776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A review of issues about null hypothesis Bayesian testing.
    Tendeiro JN; Kiers HAL
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Dec; 24(6):774-795. PubMed ID: 31094544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Beyond p-values in the evaluation of brain-computer interfaces: A Bayesian estimation approach.
    Melinscak F; Montesano L
    J Neurosci Methods; 2016 Sep; 270():30-45. PubMed ID: 27317498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Statistical inference in abstracts of major medical and epidemiology journals 1975-2014: a systematic review.
    Stang A; Deckert M; Poole C; Rothman KJ
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2017 Jan; 32(1):21-29. PubMed ID: 27858205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Confidence intervals permit, but do not guarantee, better inference than statistical significance testing.
    Coulson M; Healey M; Fidler F; Cumming G
    Front Psychol; 2010; 1():26. PubMed ID: 21607077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Current Research and Statistical Practices in Sport Science and a Need for Change.
    Bernards JR; Sato K; Haff GG; Bazyler CD
    Sports (Basel); 2017 Nov; 5(4):. PubMed ID: 29910447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Why checking model assumptions using null hypothesis significance tests does not suffice: A plea for plausibility.
    Tijmstra J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Apr; 25(2):548-559. PubMed ID: 29476482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. P > .05: The incorrect interpretation of "not significant" results is a significant problem.
    Smith RJ
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2020 Aug; 172(4):521-527. PubMed ID: 32570289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Fisher, Neyman-Pearson or NHST? A tutorial for teaching data testing.
    Perezgonzalez JD
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():223. PubMed ID: 25784889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.