BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38026131)

  • 1. Evaluation of skin prick location on the forearm using a novel skin prick automated test device.
    Seys SF; Gorris S; Uyttebroek S; Backaert W; Jorissen M; Schrijvers R; Daems R; Loeckx D; Van Gerven L; Hellings PW
    Front Allergy; 2023; 4():1289031. PubMed ID: 38026131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Skin Prick Automated Test device offers more reliable allergy test results compared to a manual skin prick test.
    Seys SF; Roux K; Claes C; Van Cappellen L; Werpin L; Loeckx D; Sebrechts H; Gorris S; Van Gerven L
    Rhinology; 2024 Apr; 62(2):216-222. PubMed ID: 37983015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The comparison of reactions in skin prick test performed with the standardized lancet and the injection needle].
    Semik-Orzech A; Barczyk A; Pierzchała W
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2008 Jun; 24(144):495-501. PubMed ID: 18702329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Lancet Weight Determines Wheal Diameter in Response to Skin Prick Testing with Histamine.
    Andersen HH; Lundgaard AC; Petersen AS; Hauberg LE; Sharma N; Hansen SD; Elberling J; Arendt-Nielsen L
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0156211. PubMed ID: 27213613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measurement and interpretation of skin prick test results.
    van der Valk JP; Gerth van Wijk R; Hoorn E; Groenendijk L; Groenendijk IM; de Jong NW
    Clin Transl Allergy; 2015; 6():8. PubMed ID: 26909142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of distance between sites and region of the body on results of skin prick tests.
    Nelson HS; Knoetzer J; Bucher B
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1996 Feb; 97(2):596-601. PubMed ID: 8621844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impaired resolution of wheals in the skin prick test and low diamine oxidase blood level in allergic patients.
    Wagner A; Buczyłko K; Zielińska-Bliźniewska H; Wagner W
    Postepy Dermatol Alergol; 2019 Oct; 36(5):538-543. PubMed ID: 31839770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [COMPARISON OF WHEAL SIZE INDUCED BY BIFURCATED NEEDLE
    Masukane S; Matsui T; Tokumo N; Makino A; Kitamura K; Takasato Y; Sugiura S; Ito K
    Arerugi; 2022; 71(5):389-396. PubMed ID: 35831164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnosis and immunotherapy of mould allergy. II. Reproducibility and relationship between skin sensitivity estimated by end-point titration and histamine equivalent reaction using skin prick test and intradermal test.
    Malling HJ
    Allergy; 1985 Jul; 40(5):354-62. PubMed ID: 4041142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The longest wheal diameter is the optimal measurement for the evaluation of skin prick tests.
    Konstantinou GN; Bousquet PJ; Zuberbier T; Papadopoulos NG
    Int Arch Allergy Immunol; 2010; 151(4):343-5. PubMed ID: 19851076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of Topical Steroids on Skin Prick Test: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Ebbesen AR; Riis LA; Gradman J
    Dermatol Ther (Heidelb); 2018 Jun; 8(2):285-290. PubMed ID: 29728933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interpreting skin prick tests in the evaluation of food allergy in children.
    Eigenmann PA; Sampson HA
    Pediatr Allergy Immunol; 1998 Nov; 9(4):186-91. PubMed ID: 9920216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Which skin prick test wheal size detects true allergy to Salsola kali?
    Al-Ahmad M; Jusufovic E; Arifhodzic N
    Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol; 2021 Sep; 53(5):228-233. PubMed ID: 32551465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical relevance is associated with allergen-specific wheal size in skin prick testing.
    Haahtela T; Burbach GJ; Bachert C; Bindslev-Jensen C; Bonini S; Bousquet J; Bousquet-Rouanet L; Bousquet PJ; Bresciani M; Bruno A; Canonica GW; Darsow U; Demoly P; Durham SR; Fokkens WJ; Giavi S; Gjomarkaj M; Gramiccioni C; Kowalski ML; Losonczy G; Orosz M; Papadopoulos NG; Stingl G; Todo-Bom A; von Mutius E; Köhli A; Wöhrl S; Järvenpää S; Kautiainen H; Petman L; Selroos O; Zuberbier T; Heinzerling LM
    Clin Exp Allergy; 2014 Mar; 44(3):407-16. PubMed ID: 24283409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of Skin Prick Test Reading Time at 10 versus 15 min in Young Infants.
    Lie A; Wärnberg Gerdin S; Skrindo I; Rehbinder EM; Jonassen CM; LeBlanc M; Staff AC; Söderhäll C; Vettukattil R; Ådalen S; Aaneland H; Lødrup Carlsen KC; Skjerven HO; Nordlund B
    Int Arch Allergy Immunol; 2022; 183(8):824-834. PubMed ID: 35350034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Skin prick test responses to codeine, histamine, and ragweed utilizing the Multitest device.
    Lin RY; Erlich ER; Don PC
    Ann Allergy; 1990 Sep; 65(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 2403228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of skin prick test criteria on estimation of prevalence and incidence of allergic sensitization in children.
    Meinert R; Frischer T; Karmaus W; Kuehr J
    Allergy; 1994 Aug; 49(7):526-32. PubMed ID: 7825719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of skin test reactivity to histamine on back and forearm in young children.
    Yuenyongviwat A; Koonrangsesomboon D; Sangsupawanich P
    Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol; 2012 Dec; 30(4):301-5. PubMed ID: 23393910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Histamine Skin Prick Tests: From Established Diagnostic Technique to Advanced Experimental Biomarker.
    Bamps D; Berdon K; Hernandez H; Schrijvers R; de Hoon J
    Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2023; 36(2):87-97. PubMed ID: 36623479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative skin prick testing. Dose-response of histamine- and allergen-induced wheal reactions.
    Malling HJ
    Allergy; 1987 Apr; 42(3):196-204. PubMed ID: 3592144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.