These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3802789)

  • 1. Performance characteristics of a laser scanner and laser printer system for radiological imaging.
    Lo SC; Taira RK; Mankovich NJ; Huang HK; Takeuchi H
    Comput Radiol; 1986; 10(5):227-37. PubMed ID: 3802789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A real-time flat-panel X-ray pixel imaging system for low-dose medical diagnostics and craniofacial applications.
    Chapuy S; Dimcovski D; Dimcovski Z; Grigoriev E; Grob E; Ligier Y; Pachoud M; Riondel F; Rüfenacht D; Sayegh C; Terrier F; Valley JF; Verdun FR
    J Craniofac Surg; 2000 Jan; 11(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 11314093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Image quality of a wet laser printer versus a paper printer for full-field digital mammograms.
    Schueller G; Kaindl E; Matzek WK; Semturs F; Schueller-Weidekamm C; Helbich TH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jan; 186(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 16357374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The laser film digitizer: density, contrast, and resolution.
    Teslow TN
    J Digit Imaging; 1997 Aug; 10(3 Suppl 1):128-32. PubMed ID: 9268857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A test pattern for quality control of laser scanner and charge-coupled device film digitizers.
    Halpern EJ
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 7734527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A real-time, flat-panel, amorphous silicon, digital x-ray imager.
    Antonuk LE; Yorkston J; Huang W; Siewerdsen JH; Boudry JM; el-Mohri Y; Marx MV
    Radiographics; 1995 Jul; 15(4):993-1000. PubMed ID: 7569143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of a high quality film duplication system using a laser digitizer: comparison with computed radiography.
    Yoshimura H; Xu XW; Doi K; MacMahon H; Hoffmann KR; Giger ML; Montner SM
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 8455513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Film-screen digital radiography.
    Schwenker RP; Eger H
    Radiography; 1985; 51(598):233-5. PubMed ID: 4048409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digitizing of radiographs with a flatbed scanner.
    Chen SK; Hollender L
    J Dent; 1995 Aug; 23(4):205-8. PubMed ID: 7629323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analog image recording using a laser printer and paper system.
    Cox GG; Johnson JA; Templeton AW; Preston DF; Lee KR; Nelson DL; Hensley KS; Dwyer SJ
    Invest Radiol; 1985 Dec; 20(9):1003-7. PubMed ID: 3908385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Specific features of monitoring the characteristics of digital X-ray diagnostic systems].
    Zelikman MI
    Med Tekh; 2002; (5):3-6. PubMed ID: 12512272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Benefits of a new direct digital x-ray imaging system.
    Jeromin LS; Lee DL; Grozalis EJ; Wolff DP
    J Belge Radiol; 1997 Oct; 80(5):254-6. PubMed ID: 9400060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital chest imaging: comparison of two film image digitizers with a classification task.
    Kundel HL; Mezrich JL; Brickman I; Siegel R; Miller WT; Epstein DM; Gefter WB; Arenson RL; Seshadri SB; Khalsa S
    Radiology; 1987 Dec; 165(3):747-52. PubMed ID: 3685354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The spatial resolution of the digital storage phosphor system. The monitor and film compared].
    Nessi R; Castellana L; Paruccini N; Blanc M; Uslenghi CM
    Radiol Med; 1995 Sep; 90(3):298-302. PubMed ID: 7501837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Demonstration of digital radiographs by means of ink jet-printed paper copies: pilot study.
    Kirkhorn T; Kehler M; Nilsson J; Lyttkens K; Andersson B; Holmer NG
    J Digit Imaging; 1992 Nov; 5(4):246-51. PubMed ID: 1457540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Progress in image processing technology related to radiological sciences: a five-year review.
    Huang HK
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1987; 25(2):143-56. PubMed ID: 3315428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital imaging of the chest.
    Merritt CR; Matthews CC; Scheinhorn D; Balter S
    J Thorac Imaging; 1985 Dec; 1(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 3916446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The film-based printout using Tetenal Printing Solution II.
    Geissler O; Rother U
    Int J Comput Dent; 2007 Jul; 10(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 18271500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The evolution of digital radiography: from storage phosphors to flat-panel detectors.
    Porcelli A; Maggi F; Spalvieri S; Meduri A; Marano P
    Rays; 2003; 28(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 14509175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Imaging: new versus traditional technological aids.
    Sanderink GC
    Int Dent J; 1993 Aug; 43(4):335-42. PubMed ID: 8276517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.