BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3802807)

  • 1. The influence of temperature on the concentration homogeneity of patch test materials.
    Goh CL; Kwok SF
    Contact Dermatitis; 1986 Oct; 15(4):231-4. PubMed ID: 3802807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Amount of nickel applied with a standard patch test.
    Fischer T; Maibach H
    Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Nov; 11(5):285-7. PubMed ID: 6525822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Strip patch test vs. conventional patch test: investigation of dose-dependent test sensitivities in nickel- and chromium-sensitive subjects.
    Dickel H; Kamphowe J; Geier J; Altmeyer P; Kuss O
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2009 Sep; 23(9):1018-25. PubMed ID: 19470058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contact sensitization of mice to nickel sulphate and potassium dichromate.
    Kimber I; Bentley AN; Hilton J
    Contact Dermatitis; 1990 Nov; 23(5):325-30. PubMed ID: 2096022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Positive patch test reactions to nickel, cobalt, and potassium dichromate in a series of 576 patients.
    Massone L; Anonide A; Borghi S; Isola V
    Cutis; 1991 Feb; 47(2):119-22. PubMed ID: 2001632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is a 5% nickel sulphate patch test concentration adequate?
    Dooms-Goossens A; Naert C; Chrispeels MT; Degreef H
    Contact Dermatitis; 1980 Apr; 6(3):232. PubMed ID: 7389344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Results of routine office patch testing.
    Lepine EM
    Contact Dermatitis; 1976 Apr; 2(2):89-91. PubMed ID: 1017185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Skin reactivity in subjects sensitive to different concentrations of nickel, chromium and cobalt].
    Piela Z; Kieć-Swierczyńska M
    Med Pr; 1998; 49(5):457-63. PubMed ID: 9919605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. False-positive, follicular and irritant patch test reactions to metal salts.
    Fischer T; Rystedt I
    Contact Dermatitis; 1985 Feb; 12(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 3157537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Softisan--a new vehicle for patch testing.
    Väänänen A; Hannuksela M
    Contact Dermatitis; 1986 Apr; 14(4):215-6. PubMed ID: 3720297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ultrasound for assessment of allergic and irritant patch test reactions.
    Serup J; Staberg B
    Contact Dermatitis; 1987 Aug; 17(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 3308312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Epicutaneous testing with a standard series. Results in 12,026 patients].
    Enders F; Przybilla B; Ring J; Burg G; Braun-Falco O
    Hautarzt; 1988 Dec; 39(12):779-86. PubMed ID: 2976753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing reliabilities of strip and conventional patch testing.
    Dickel H; Geier J; Kreft B; Pfützner W; Kuss O
    Contact Dermatitis; 2017 Jun; 76(6):342-349. PubMed ID: 28271532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of TRUE Test and Finn Chambers in construction workers.
    Fernández Vozmediano JM; Gil Tocados G; Manrique Plaza A
    Contact Dermatitis; 1993 Apr; 28(4):244-5. PubMed ID: 8508637
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The frequency of contact sensitivity in North America 1972-74.
    Contact Dermatitis; 1975 Oct; 1(5):277-80. PubMed ID: 1235277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Standardization of patch tests in Japan.
    Contact Dermatitis; 1976 Aug; 2(4):205-11. PubMed ID: 1021351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Six-hour versus 48-hour patch testing with varying concentrations of potassium dichromate.
    Kosann MK; Brancaccio RR; Shupack JL; Franks AG; Cohen DE
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Jun; 9(2):92-5. PubMed ID: 9601909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cobalt allergy: suitable test concentration, and concomitant reactivity to nickel and chromium.
    Lidén C; Andersson N; Julander A; Matura M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2016 Jun; 74(6):360-7. PubMed ID: 26996152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Follow-up study of patients with contact dermatitis caused by chromates, nickel, and cobalt.
    Dooms-Goossens A; Ceuterick A; Vanmaele N; Degreef H
    Dermatologica; 1980; 160(4):249-60. PubMed ID: 7358190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Positive nickel patch tests do not intensify positive reactions to adjacent patch tests with dichromate. Results from a double-blind multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG).
    Brasch J; Kreilgård B; Henseler T; Aberer W; Fuchs T; Pflüger R; Hoeck U; Gefeller O
    Contact Dermatitis; 2000 Sep; 43(3):144-9. PubMed ID: 10985630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.