163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38028144)
1. Cemiplimab combined with chemotherapy
Zhu G; Cai H; Zheng Z
Ther Adv Med Oncol; 2023; 15():17588359231213619. PubMed ID: 38028144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness of cemiplimab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Liang X; Chen X; Li H; Li Y
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1113374. PubMed ID: 37182130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Economic evaluation of cemiplimab plus chemotherapy regimen for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
Lang Y; Lin Y; Deng M; Liu X
BMC Cancer; 2024 Feb; 24(1):236. PubMed ID: 38383374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. First-line Cemiplimab versus Standard Chemotherapy in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with at Least 50% Programmed Cell Death Receptor Ligand-1 Positivity: Analysis of Cost-effectiveness.
Zhang M; Liu X; Wen F; Wu Q; Zhou K; Bai L; Li Q
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2022 Mar; 34(3):e123-e129. PubMed ID: 34736841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pembrolizumab vs cemiplimab for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer with PD-L1 expression levels of at least 50%: A network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.
Li Y; Liang X; Yang T; Guo S; Chen X
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():878054. PubMed ID: 36226060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-Effectiveness of Cemiplimab Versus Standard of Care in the United States for First-Line Treatment of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Expression ≥50.
Kuznik A; Smare C; Chen CI; Venkatachalam M; Keeping S; Atsou K; Xu Y; Wilson F; Guyot P; Chan K; Glowienka E; Konidaris G
Value Health; 2022 Feb; 25(2):203-214. PubMed ID: 35094793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Cemiplimab Versus Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment in Advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 Expression Levels of at Least 50.
Wang L; Peng Y; Zeng X; Peng L; Li S; Qin S; Wan X; Tan C
Adv Ther; 2021 Aug; 38(8):4354-4365. PubMed ID: 34241780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The cost-effectiveness of cemiplimab plus chemotherapy as the first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Lu T; Huang Y; Cai Z; Lin W; Chen X; Chen R; Hu Y
Front Pharmacol; 2023; 14():1171302. PubMed ID: 37564176
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer in China.
Zheng Z; Fang L; Cai H
BMC Cancer; 2023 Sep; 23(1):823. PubMed ID: 37667230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness analysis of toripalimab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in China.
Zhang M; Xu K; Lin Y; Zhou C; Bao Y; Zhang L; Li X
Front Immunol; 2023; 14():1169752. PubMed ID: 37313403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. First-Line ICI Monotherapies for Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Patients With PD-L1 of at Least 50%: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Liu Q; Zhou Z; Luo X; Yi L; Peng L; Wan X; Tan C; Zeng X
Front Pharmacol; 2021; 12():788569. PubMed ID: 34992538
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Preliminary Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Utility Analysis of Cemiplimab in Patients with Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Italy.
Ghetti G; D'Avella MC; Pradelli L
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res; 2021; 13():121-133. PubMed ID: 33603419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Toripalimab plus chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis.
Huo G; Liu W; Kang S; Chen P
Front Pharmacol; 2023; 14():1131219. PubMed ID: 36865925
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab versus standard-of-care chemotherapy for first-line treatment of PD-L1 positive (>50%) metastatic squamous and non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in France.
Chouaid C; Bensimon L; Clay E; Millier A; Levy-Bachelot L; Huang M; Levy P
Lung Cancer; 2019 Jan; 127():44-52. PubMed ID: 30642550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cemiplimab as Second-Line Therapy for Patients with Recurrent Cervical Cancer: A United States-based Cost-effectiveness Analysis.
Liu K; Zhu Y; Zhou Y; Zhu H
Adv Ther; 2023 Apr; 40(4):1838-1849. PubMed ID: 36870042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sugemalimab plus chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis.
Liang X; Chen X; Li H; Liu X; Li Y
Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1054405. PubMed ID: 36923040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness analysis of cemiplimab vs pembrolizumab for treatment of advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.
Paul E; Konidaris G; Cope S; Chen CI; Keeping S; Xu Y; Atsou K; Ayers D; Guyot P; Sasane M; Mojebi A; Kuznik A
J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2021 Nov; 27(11):1513-1525. PubMed ID: 34351214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness of adding rh-endostatin to first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in China.
Wu B; Chen H; Shen J; Ye M
Clin Ther; 2011 Oct; 33(10):1446-55. PubMed ID: 21992806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness of nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus chemotherapy as first-line therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Shu Y; Ding Y; Li F; Zhang Q
Int Immunopharmacol; 2023 Jan; 114():109589. PubMed ID: 36700770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness analysis of sintilimab plus pemetrexed and platinum versus chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment in metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in China.
Liu H; Wang Y; He Q
Health Econ Rev; 2022 Dec; 12(1):66. PubMed ID: 36581793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
