131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38029660)
41. Size exclusion chromatography of synthetic polymers and biopolymers on common reversed phase and hydrophilic interaction chromatography columns.
Caltabiano AM; Foley JP; Barth HG
J Chromatogr A; 2016 Mar; 1437():74-87. PubMed ID: 26877177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Preparation and characterization of surfactin-modified silica stationary phase for reversed-phase and hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography.
Ohyama K; Inoue Y; Kishikawa N; Kuroda N
J Chromatogr A; 2014 Dec; 1371():257-60. PubMed ID: 25456604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. A Methodology for the Estimation and Modelling of the Obstruction Factor in the Expression for Mesopore Diffusion in Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatography Particles.
Song H; Desmet G; Cabooter D
J Chromatogr A; 2020 Aug; 1625():461285. PubMed ID: 32709335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Some factors that can lead to poor peak shape in hydrophilic interaction chromatography, and possibilities for their remediation.
Heaton JC; McCalley DV
J Chromatogr A; 2016 Jan; 1427():37-44. PubMed ID: 26689823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. A New Definition of the Stationary Phase Volume in Mixed-Mode Chromatographic Columns in Hydrophilic Liquid Chromatography.
Jandera P; Hájek T
Molecules; 2021 Aug; 26(16):. PubMed ID: 34443406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Improved sample introduction approach in hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography to avoid breakthrough of proteins.
Pérez-Robles R; Fekete S; Kormány R; Navas N; Guillarme D
J Chromatogr A; 2024 Jan; 1713():464498. PubMed ID: 37980809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The relative importance of the adsorption and partitioning mechanisms in hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography.
Gritti F; Höltzel A; Tallarek U; Guiochon G
J Chromatogr A; 2015 Jan; 1376():112-25. PubMed ID: 25542707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Efficiency of short, small-diameter columns for reversed-phase liquid chromatography under practical operating conditions.
Ma Y; Chassy AW; Miyazaki S; Motokawa M; Morisato K; Uzu H; Ohira M; Furuno M; Nakanishi K; Minakuchi H; Mriziq K; Farkas T; Fiehn O; Tanaka N
J Chromatogr A; 2015 Feb; 1383():47-57. PubMed ID: 25648581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Synthesis of a mixed-model stationary phase derived from glutamine for HPLC separation of structurally different biologically active compounds: HILIC and reversed-phase applications.
Aral T; Aral H; Ziyadanoğulları B; Ziyadanoğulları R
Talanta; 2015 Jan; 131():64-73. PubMed ID: 25281074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Effects of the operation parameters on HILIC separation of flavonoids on zwitterionic column.
Sentkowska A; Biesaga M; Pyrzynska K
Talanta; 2013 Oct; 115():284-90. PubMed ID: 24054593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Study of surface-bonded dicationic ionic liquids as stationary phases for hydrophilic interaction chromatography.
Qiao L; Li H; Shan Y; Wang S; Shi X; Lu X; Xu G
J Chromatogr A; 2014 Feb; 1330():40-50. PubMed ID: 24484692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Confinement Effects on Distribution and Transport of Neutral Solutes in a Small Hydrophobic Nanopore.
Trebel N; Höltzel A; Tallarek U
J Phys Chem B; 2022 Oct; 126(39):7781-7795. PubMed ID: 36149739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Multicomponent (n >or= 3) sorption isotherms in reversed-phase liquid chromatography: the effect of immobilized eluent on the retention of analytes.
Mallette J; Wang M; Parcher JF
Anal Chem; 2010 Apr; 82(8):3329-36. PubMed ID: 20307055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Retention mechanisms of amitriptyline and its impurities on amide, amino, diol, and silica columns in hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography.
Knežević Ratković D; Kukobat R; Kasagić-Vujanović I
J Sep Sci; 2024 May; 47(9-10):e2300949. PubMed ID: 38726739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Using the fundamentals of adsorption to understand peak distortion due to strong solvent effect in hydrophilic interaction chromatography.
Gritti F; Sehajpal J; Fairchild J
J Chromatogr A; 2017 Mar; 1489():95-106. PubMed ID: 28193468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Investigation of the temperature dependence of water adsorption on silica-based stationary phases in hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography.
Bartó E; Felinger A; Jandera P
J Chromatogr A; 2017 Mar; 1489():143-148. PubMed ID: 28213986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Retention and selectivity effects caused by bonding of a polar urea-type ligand to silica: a study on mixed-mode retention mechanisms and the pivotal role of solute-silanol interactions in the hydrophilic interaction chromatography elution mode.
Bicker W; Wu J; Yeman H; Albert K; Lindner W
J Chromatogr A; 2011 Feb; 1218(7):882-95. PubMed ID: 21067765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Peptide retention time prediction in hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography. Comparison of separation selectivity between bare silica and bonded stationary phases.
Spicer V; Krokhin OV
J Chromatogr A; 2018 Jan; 1534():75-84. PubMed ID: 29306631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography in analysis of granisetron HCl and its related substances. Retention mechanisms and method development.
Maksić J; Tumpa A; Stajić A; Jovanović M; Rakić T; Jančić-Stojanović B
J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2016 May; 123():93-103. PubMed ID: 26895494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Mixed-Mode Hydrophilic Interactions/Reversed-Phase Retention Mechanism in Thin-Layer Chromatography.
Obradović D; Kowalska T; Agbaba D
J Chromatogr Sci; 2022 Apr; 60(4):372-386. PubMed ID: 34089050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
