134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38030939)
1. (Un)Reliable detection of menstrual blood in forensic casework - evaluation of the Seratec® PMB test with mock samples.
Konrad H; Hartung B; Poetsch M
Int J Legal Med; 2024 May; 138(3):781-786. PubMed ID: 38030939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Forensic differentiation between peripheral and menstrual blood in cases of alleged sexual assault-validating an immunochromatographic multiplex assay for simultaneous detection of human hemoglobin and D-dimer.
Holtkötter H; Dias Filho CR; Schwender K; Stadler C; Vennemann M; Pacheco AC; Roca G
Int J Legal Med; 2018 May; 132(3):683-690. PubMed ID: 29058082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Advancing forensic RNA typing: On non-target secretions, a nasal mucosa marker, a differential co-extraction protocol and the sensitivity of DNA and RNA profiling.
van den Berge M; Bhoelai B; Harteveld J; Matai A; Sijen T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Jan; 20():119-129. PubMed ID: 26590860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. More than just blood, saliva, or sperm-setup of a workflow for body fluid identification by DNA methylation analysis.
Konrad H; Jürgens L; Hartung B; Poetsch M
Int J Legal Med; 2023 Nov; 137(6):1683-1692. PubMed ID: 37535091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of three commercial kits effective identification of menstrual blood based on the D-dimer.
Tsai LC; Liu KL; Lin WY; Lin YC; Huang NE; Lee JC; Linacre A; Hsieh HM
Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Sep; 338():111389. PubMed ID: 35849993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of Blood and Semen Detection and DNA Collection from Swabs up to Three Months after Deposition on Five Different Cloth Materials.
Medina-Paz F; Kuba B; Kryvorutsky E; Roca G; Zapico SC
Int J Mol Sci; 2024 Mar; 25(6):. PubMed ID: 38542494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of an immunochromatographic D-dimer test to presumptively identify menstrual fluid in forensic exhibits.
Holtkötter H; Dierig L; Schürenkamp M; Sibbing U; Pfeiffer H; Vennemann M
Int J Legal Med; 2015 Jan; 129(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 25370906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Knife wound or nosebleed-where does the blood at the crime scene come from?
Konrad H; Lawniczek J; Bajramjan C; Weber L; Bajanowski T; Poetsch M
Int J Legal Med; 2023 Jul; 137(4):1301-1308. PubMed ID: 37148347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of highly sensitive and specific mRNA multiplex system (XCYR1) for forensic human body fluids and tissues identification.
Xu Y; Xie J; Cao Y; Zhou H; Ping Y; Chen L; Gu L; Hu W; Bi G; Ge J; Chen X; Zhao Z
PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e100123. PubMed ID: 24991806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Identification of five types of forensic body fluids based on stepwise discriminant analysis.
He H; Han N; Ji C; Zhao Y; Hu S; Kong Q; Ye J; Ji A; Sun Q
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Sep; 48():102337. PubMed ID: 32693370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of latex agglutination tests for fibrin-fibrinogen degradation products in the forensic identification of menstrual blood.
Akutsu T; Watanabe K; Motani H; Iwase H; Sakurada K
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2012 Jan; 14(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 22189168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Facile semi-automated forensic body fluid identification by multiplex solution hybridization of NanoString® barcode probes to specific mRNA targets.
Danaher P; White RL; Hanson EK; Ballantyne J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Jan; 14():18-30. PubMed ID: 25277098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection and visualization of human tears using alternate light sources for forensic purposes.
Aparna R; Iyer RS
Sci Justice; 2021 Nov; 61(6):771-778. PubMed ID: 34802651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Recovery of DNA from SERATEC
Conte J; Ruddy A; Domonoski L; Shanahan A; Daley N; McDevitt C; Roca G
J Forensic Sci; 2022 May; 67(3):1176-1183. PubMed ID: 35182073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Metatranscriptomic characterization of six types of forensic samples and its potential application to body fluid/tissue identification: A pilot study.
Liu Z; Liu J; Geng J; Wu E; Zhu J; Cong B; Wu R; Sun H
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2024 Jan; 68():102978. PubMed ID: 37995518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. "The acid test"-validation of the ParaDNA® Body Fluid ID Test for routine forensic casework.
Kulstein G; Pably P; Fürst A; Wiegand P; Hadrys T
Int J Legal Med; 2019 May; 133(3):751-757. PubMed ID: 30460509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of semen presumptive tests for use at crime scenes.
Laffan A; Sawyer I; Quinones I; Daniel B
Med Sci Law; 2011 Jan; 51(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 21595415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Developmental validation of a microRNA panel using quadratic discriminant analysis for the classification of seven forensically relevant body fluids.
Rhodes C; Lewis C; Szekely J; Campbell A; Creighton MA; Boone E; Seashols-Williams S
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102692. PubMed ID: 35366474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. mRNA profiling of mock casework samples: Results of a FoRNAP collaborative exercise.
Salzmann AP; Bamberg M; Courts C; Dørum G; Gosch A; Hadrys T; Hadzic G; Neis M; Schneider PM; Sijen T; den Berge MV; Wiegand P; Haas C
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Jan; 50():102409. PubMed ID: 33220528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Identification of human semenogelin in membrane strip test as an alternative method for the detection of semen.
Pang BC; Cheung BK
Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Jun; 169(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 16949235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
