These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38033104)

  • 21. Preliminary Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.
    Snell DL; Iverson GL; Panenka WJ; Silverberg ND
    J Neurotrauma; 2017 Dec; 34(23):3256-3261. PubMed ID: 28895491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Validity and Reliability of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in Turkish Psychiatry Patients and Healthy Controls].
    Aslan Kunt D; Dereboy F
    Turk Psikiyatri Derg; 2018; 29(4):248-257. PubMed ID: 30887475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHODAS-II) in patients with multiple sclerosis.
    Magistrale G; Pisani V; Argento O; Incerti CC; Bozzali M; Cadavid D; Caltagirone C; Medori R; DeLuca J; Nocentini U
    Mult Scler; 2015 Apr; 21(4):448-56. PubMed ID: 25092769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Validation of the "World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule for children, WHODAS-Child" in Rwanda.
    Scorza P; Stevenson A; Canino G; Mushashi C; Kanyanganzi F; Munyanah M; Betancourt T
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e57725. PubMed ID: 23505437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Validity of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in individuals with Huntington disease (HD).
    Carlozzi NE; Kratz AL; Downing NR; Goodnight S; Miner JA; Migliore N; Paulsen JS
    Qual Life Res; 2015 Aug; 24(8):1963-71. PubMed ID: 25636661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Disability in bipolar I disorder: the 36-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0.
    Guilera G; Gómez-Benito J; Pino Ó; Rojo E; Vieta E; Cuesta MJ; Purdon SE; Bernardo M; Crespo-Facorro B; Franco M; Martínez-Arán A; Safont G; Tabarés-Seisdedos R; Rejas J;
    J Affect Disord; 2015 Mar; 174():353-60. PubMed ID: 25553398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Measurement Properties and Minimal Important Change of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in Persons With Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review.
    Wong JJ; DeSouza A; Hogg-Johnson S; De Groote W; Southerst D; Belchos M; Lemeunier N; Alexopulos S; Varmazyar H; Mior SA; Stern PJ; Nordin MC; Taylor-Vaisey A; Cieza A; Côté P
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2023 Feb; 104(2):287-301. PubMed ID: 35798195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Yoruba version of the Beck Hopelessness Scale: psychometric characteristics and correlates of hopelessness in a sample of Nigerian psychiatric outpatients.
    Aloba O; Akinsulore A; Mapayi B; Oloniniyi I; Mosaku K; Alimi T; Esan O
    Compr Psychiatry; 2015 Jan; 56():258-71. PubMed ID: 25446724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Proxy reliability of the 12-item world health organization disability assessment schedule II among adult patients with mental disorders.
    Zhou W; Liu Q; Yu Y; Xiao S; Chen L; Khoshnood K; Zheng S
    Qual Life Res; 2020 Aug; 29(8):2219-2229. PubMed ID: 32388787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in patients attending the pain clinic.
    Fujiwara A; Ida M; Kimoto K; Watanabe K; Kawaguchi M
    J Anesth; 2021 Feb; 35(1):81-85. PubMed ID: 33151411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Support for the higher-order factor structure of the WHODAS 2.0 self-report version in a Dutch outpatient psychiatric setting.
    Williams GL; de Beurs E; Spinhoven P; Flens G; Paap MCS
    Qual Life Res; 2021 Oct; 30(10):2939-2949. PubMed ID: 34117613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation with the ICF Measure of Participation and Activities Screener and the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule II in persons with spinal cord injury.
    van der Zee CH; Post MW; Brinkhof MW; Wagenaar RC
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Jan; 95(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 24008052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Validity of the self-rated 36-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 as a measure of functioning in Swedish psychiatric outpatients.
    Ramklint M; Söderberg P; Tungström S; Nordenskjöld A; Hermansson L
    Nord J Psychiatry; 2023 Apr; 77(3):276-281. PubMed ID: 35833609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Psychometric Properties of the 12-Item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0), Greek Version: A Cross-Sectional Study on Applicants of Welfare Benefits.
    Theotokatos G; Escorpizo R; Angelopoulos TJ; Chrysagis NK; Bickenbach J; Venieri A; Karteroliotis K; Grammatopoulou E; Skordilis E
    Cureus; 2023 Nov; 15(11):e48588. PubMed ID: 38084177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Confirmatory factor analysis of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS-2.0) within the clubhouse model of psychosocial rehabilitation for serious mental illness.
    Wojtalik JA; Kotwani A; Honarvar RL; Eack SM; D'Angelo L; Whiting-Madison C; Brown WJ
    Psychiatr Rehabil J; 2024 Sep; 47(3):229-239. PubMed ID: 38095977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Agreement of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 in parents and youth with physical illness living in Canada.
    Ferro MA; Basque D; Elgie M; Dol M
    Disabil Rehabil; 2023 Sep; 45(19):3125-3134. PubMed ID: 36066067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Validation of the World Health Organization Assessment Schedule II Chinese Traditional Version (WHODAS II CT) in persons with disabilities and chronic illnesses for Chinese population.
    Cheung MK; Hung AT; Poon PK; Fong DY; Li LS; Chow ES; Qiu ZY; Liou TH
    Disabil Rehabil; 2015; 37(20):1902-7. PubMed ID: 25495681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessing disability in older patients with schizophrenia: results from the WHODAS-II.
    McKibbin C; Patterson TL; Jeste DV
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 2004 Jun; 192(6):405-13. PubMed ID: 15167403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Is it time to rethink disability assessment in low back pain? Reliability, internal consistency, and construct validity of the Brazilian WHODAS 2.0 for chronic low back pain.
    Silva TFCE; Medeiros PMSS; Leite CF; Castro SS; Nunes ACL; Jesus-Moraleida FR
    Physiother Res Int; 2023 Oct; 28(4):e2025. PubMed ID: 37231998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Development of traditional Chinese version of World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 36--item (WHODAS 2.0) in Taiwan: validity and reliability analyses.
    Chiu TY; Yen CF; Chou CH; Lin JD; Hwang AW; Liao HF; Chi WC
    Res Dev Disabil; 2014 Nov; 35(11):2812-20. PubMed ID: 25094056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.