119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38035426)
1. Analysis and predictability of technologists' perception of MR exam complexity.
Wang X; Uhlemann F; Borgert J; Chaduvula SC; Tellis R; Frydrychowicz A; Barkhausen J; Amthor T
Radiography (Lond); 2024 Jan; 30(1):151-158. PubMed ID: 38035426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Relationship Between Leadership Styles and Job Satisfaction: A Survey of MR Technologists' Perceptions.
DeLay L; Clark KR
Radiol Technol; 2020 Sep; 92(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 32879013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nuclear Medicine Technologists' Perception and Current Assessment of Quality: A Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Technologist Section Survey.
Mann A; Farrell MB; Williams J; Basso D
J Nucl Med Technol; 2017 Jun; 45(2):67-74. PubMed ID: 28473461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiologic Technologists' Perceptions of Imaging Appropriateness in Radiography, CT, and Mammography.
Moore QT
Radiol Technol; 2022; 93(5):437-453. PubMed ID: 35508405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors predicting the time-length variability of identically protocoled MRI exams.
Avey GD; Belden DS; Zea RD; Yu JJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jun; 49(7):e265-e270. PubMed ID: 30637838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Study of lone working magnetic resonance technologists in Western Australia.
Dewland TA; Hancock LN; Sargeant S; Bailey RK; Sarginson RA; Ng CK
Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2013 Dec; 26(6):837-45. PubMed ID: 24464563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiologic Technologists' Perceived Reasons for Inappropriate Imaging.
Moore QT
Radiol Technol; 2022; 93(6):532-543. PubMed ID: 35790302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiologic Technologists' Knowledge of And Comfort Explaining Effective Dose.
Moore QT
Radiol Technol; 2022 Nov; 94(2):84-93. PubMed ID: 36344200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Technologists' Characteristics and Quality of Positioning in Daily Practice in a Canadian Breast Cancer Screening Program.
Guertin MH; Théberge I; Zomahoun HT; Dufresne MP; Pelletier É; Brisson J
Acad Radiol; 2016 Nov; 23(11):1359-1366. PubMed ID: 27567127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automated Billing Code Retrieval from MRI Scanner Log Data.
Denck J; Landschütz W; Nairz K; Heverhagen JT; Maier A; Rothgang E
J Digit Imaging; 2019 Dec; 32(6):1103-1111. PubMed ID: 31240415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predicting slot lengths of MRI exams to decrease observed discrepancies between planning and execution.
Wang X; Aski SN; Uhlemann F; Gupta V; Amthor T
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2024; 53(3):359-368. PubMed ID: 38302304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Importance of Professional Values From Radiologic Technologists' Perspective.
Haynes KW
Radiol Technol; 2020 Jul; 91(6):525-532. PubMed ID: 32606230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. New Zealand and Australian MRI technologists' (radiographers) MRI safety knowledge and confidence levels.
Mittendorff L; Young A; Lee A; Sim JH
Radiography (Lond); 2023 Jul; 29(4):697-704. PubMed ID: 37187067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Investigating the experiences of New Zealand MRI technologists: Exploring intra-orbital metallic foreign body safety practices.
Jacobs PK; Henwood S
J Med Radiat Sci; 2013 Dec; 60(4):123-30. PubMed ID: 26229620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Recruitment and retention topics for a changing environment in medical imaging.
Luckett DR
Radiol Manage; 2000; 22(5):32-7. PubMed ID: 11151319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characterizing the Mammography Technologist Workforce in North Carolina.
Henderson LM; Marsh MW; Benefield T; Pearsall E; Durham D; Schroeder BF; Bowling JM; Viglione CA; Yankaskas BC
J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Dec; 12(12 Pt B):1419-26. PubMed ID: 26614888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of tech aides in radiology.
Sferrella SM; Story CP
Radiol Manage; 2004; 26(2):22-30. PubMed ID: 15098899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intrapersonal and Institutional Influences On Overall Perception of Radiation Safety Among Radiologic Technologists.
Moore QT; Walker DA; Frush DP; Daniel M; Pavkov TW
Radiol Technol; 2022 Jan; 93(3):255-267. PubMed ID: 35017269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A new concept in radiology QA in a large setting.
Tomlinson D; Stapleman K
Radiol Manage; 1998; 20(2):30-7. PubMed ID: 10179190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impacting key performance indicators in an academic MR imaging department through process improvement.
Recht M; Macari M; Lawson K; Mulholland T; Chen D; Kim D; Babb J
J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 Mar; 10(3):202-6. PubMed ID: 23245434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
