These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38036655)

  • 1. Psychological inoculation strategies to fight climate disinformation across 12 countries.
    Spampatti T; Hahnel UJJ; Trutnevyte E; Brosch T
    Nat Hum Behav; 2024 Feb; 8(2):380-398. PubMed ID: 38036655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Climate Change Disinformation and How to Combat It.
    Lewandowsky S
    Annu Rev Public Health; 2021 Apr; 42():1-21. PubMed ID: 33355475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Disinformation as an obstructionist strategy in climate change mitigation: a review of the scientific literature for a systemic understanding of the phenomenon.
    Gertrudix M; Carbonell-Alcocer A; Arcos R; Arribas CM; Codesido-Linares V; Benítez-Aranda N
    Open Res Eur; 2024; 4():169. PubMed ID: 39399659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rational Irrationality: Modeling Climate Change Belief Polarization Using Bayesian Networks.
    Cook J; Lewandowsky S
    Top Cogn Sci; 2016 Jan; 8(1):160-79. PubMed ID: 26749179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Decolonizing Knowledge Upstream: New Ways to Deconstruct and Fight Disinformation in an Era of COVID-19, Extreme Digital Transformation, and Climate Emergency.
    Özdemir V; Springer S
    OMICS; 2022 May; 26(5):247-269. PubMed ID: 35544326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The disinformation playbook: how industry manipulates the science-policy process-and how to restore scientific integrity.
    Reed G; Hendlin Y; Desikan A; MacKinney T; Berman E; Goldman GT
    J Public Health Policy; 2021 Dec; 42(4):622-634. PubMed ID: 34811464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence and seepage: An evidence-resistant minority can affect public opinion and scientific belief formation.
    Lewandowsky S; Pilditch TD; Madsen JK; Oreskes N; Risbey JS
    Cognition; 2019 Jul; 188():124-139. PubMed ID: 30686473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A toolkit for understanding and addressing climate scepticism.
    Hornsey MJ; Lewandowsky S
    Nat Hum Behav; 2022 Nov; 6(11):1454-1464. PubMed ID: 36385174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence.
    Cook J; Lewandowsky S; Ecker UKH
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0175799. PubMed ID: 28475576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scientific truth or debate: On the link between perceived scientific consensus and belief in anthropogenic climate change.
    Bertoldo R; Mays C; Böhm G; Poortinga W; Poumadère M; Tvinnereim E; Arnold A; Steentjes K; Pidgeon N
    Public Underst Sci; 2019 Oct; 28(7):778-796. PubMed ID: 31359837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Ethics of Belief, Cognition, and Climate Change Pseudoskepticism: Implications for Public Discourse.
    Torcello L
    Top Cogn Sci; 2016 Jan; 8(1):19-48. PubMed ID: 26799170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ingraining Polio Vaccine Acceptance through Public Service Advertisements in the Digital Era: The Moderating Role of Misinformation, Disinformation, Fake News, and Religious Fatalism.
    Jin Q; Raza SH; Yousaf M; Munawar R; Shah AA; Hassan S; Shaikh RS; Ogadimma EC
    Vaccines (Basel); 2022 Oct; 10(10):. PubMed ID: 36298598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inoculating the Public against Misinformation about Climate Change.
    van der Linden S; Leiserowitz A; Rosenthal S; Maibach E
    Glob Chall; 2017 Feb; 1(2):1600008. PubMed ID: 31565263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Responses to digital disinformation as part of hybrid threats: a systematic review on the effects of disinformation and the effectiveness of fact-checking/debunking.
    Arcos R; Gertrudix M; Arribas C; Cardarilli M
    Open Res Eur; 2022; 2():8. PubMed ID: 37645289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Climate of conspiracy: A meta-analysis of the consequences of belief in conspiracy theories about climate change.
    Biddlestone M; Azevedo F; van der Linden S
    Curr Opin Psychol; 2022 Aug; 46():101390. PubMed ID: 35802986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Communication in times of pandemic: information, disinformation, and provisional lessons from the coronavirus crisis].
    Casino G
    Gac Sanit; 2022; 36 Suppl 1():S97-S104. PubMed ID: 35781157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Climate change helplessness and the (de)moralization of individual energy behavior.
    Salomon E; Preston JL; Tannenbaum MB
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2017 Mar; 23(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 28165276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Scientific-Consensus Communication About Contested Science: A Preregistered Meta-Analysis.
    van Stekelenburg A; Schaap G; Veling H; van 't Riet J; Buijzen M
    Psychol Sci; 2022 Dec; 33(12):1989-2008. PubMed ID: 36242521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. #JunkScience: Investigating pseudoscience disinformation in the Russian Internet Research Agency tweets.
    Strudwicke IJ; Grant WJ
    Public Underst Sci; 2020 Jul; 29(5):459-472. PubMed ID: 32597365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fake news in the age of COVID-19: evolutional and psychobiological considerations.
    Giotakos O
    Psychiatriki; 2022 Sep; 33(3):183-186. PubMed ID: 35947862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.