These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38036870)

  • 1. High target prevalence may reduce the spread of attention during search tasks.
    Pinto JDG; Papesh MH
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Jan; 86(1):62-83. PubMed ID: 38036870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Failures of perception in the low-prevalence effect: Evidence from active and passive visual search.
    Hout MC; Walenchok SC; Goldinger SD; Wolfe JM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Aug; 41(4):977-94. PubMed ID: 25915073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual search as an embodied process: The effects of perspective change and external reference on search performance.
    Zhang H; Pan JS
    J Vis; 2022 Sep; 22(10):13. PubMed ID: 36107125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Eye movements and the label feedback effect: Speaking modulates visual search via template integrity.
    Hebert KP; Goldinger SD; Walenchok SC
    Cognition; 2021 May; 210():104587. PubMed ID: 33508577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Target processing in overt serial visual search involves the dorsal attention network: A fixation-based event-related fMRI study.
    Ischebeck A; Hiebel H; Miller J; Höfler M; Gilchrist ID; Körner C
    Neuropsychologia; 2021 Mar; 153():107763. PubMed ID: 33493526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patterns of eye movements during parallel and serial visual search tasks.
    Williams DE; Reingold EM; Moscovitch M; Behrmann M
    Can J Exp Psychol; 1997 Jun; 51(2):151-64. PubMed ID: 9340075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Decision processes in visual search as a function of target prevalence.
    Peltier C; Becker MW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1466-76. PubMed ID: 27149294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implicit processing during change blindness revealed with mouse-contingent and gaze-contingent displays.
    Chetverikov A; Kuvaldina M; MacInnes WJ; Jóhannesson ÓI; Kristjánsson Á
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 May; 80(4):844-859. PubMed ID: 29363028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relations between Eye Movement, Postural Sway and Cognitive Involvement in Unprecise and Precise Visual Tasks.
    Bonnet CT; Davin T; Hoang JY; Baudry S
    Neuroscience; 2019 Sep; 416():177-189. PubMed ID: 31356899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hybrid search in the temporal domain: Evidence for rapid, serial logarithmic search through memory.
    Drew T; Wolfe JM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Feb; 76(2):296-303. PubMed ID: 24343519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incidental learning speeds visual search by lowering response thresholds, not by improving efficiency: evidence from eye movements.
    Hout MC; Goldinger SD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Feb; 38(1):90-112. PubMed ID: 21574743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Categorical templates are more useful when features are consistent: Evidence from eye movements during search for societally important vehicles.
    Hout MC; Robbins A; Godwin HJ; Fitzsimmons G; Scarince C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Aug; 79(6):1578-1592. PubMed ID: 28638974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The interplay between gaze and consistency in scene viewing: Evidence from visual search by young and older adults.
    Fernandes EG; Phillips LH; Slessor G; Tatler BW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jul; 83(5):1954-1970. PubMed ID: 33748905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quitting thresholds in visual search are impacted by target present detection times but not their variability.
    Becker MW; Rodriguez A; Pontious D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Nov; 84(8):2461-2471. PubMed ID: 36258142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The attentional template in high and low similarity search: Optimal tuning or tuning to relations?
    Hamblin-Frohman Z; Becker SI
    Cognition; 2021 Jul; 212():104732. PubMed ID: 33862440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Target enhancement and distractor inhibition affect transitory surround suppression in dual tasks using multiple rapid serial visual presentation streams.
    Wu X; Greenwood P; Fu S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(9):1777-98. PubMed ID: 26447933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Response, rather than target detection, triggers the attentional boost effect in visual search.
    Toh YN; Lee VG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Jan; 48(1):77-93. PubMed ID: 35073145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptual failures in the selection and identification of low-prevalence targets in relative prevalence visual search.
    Godwin HJ; Menneer T; Riggs CA; Cave KR; Donnelly N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jan; 77(1):150-9. PubMed ID: 25214305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Eye movements reveal how task difficulty moulds visual search.
    Young AH; Hulleman J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Feb; 39(1):168-90. PubMed ID: 22642215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hybrid foraging search: Searching for multiple instances of multiple types of target.
    Wolfe JM; Aizenman AM; Boettcher SE; Cain MS
    Vision Res; 2016 Feb; 119():50-9. PubMed ID: 26731644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.