These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38036958)

  • 1. Micro-genetic environmental sensitivity across macro-environments of chickens reared in Burkina Faso and France.
    Madsen MD; Duijvesteijn N; van der Werf J; Clark S
    Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Nov; 55(1):85. PubMed ID: 38036958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Macro- and micro-genetic environmental sensitivity of yearling weight in Angus beef cattle.
    Madsen MD; van der Werf JHJ; Clark S
    Animal; 2024 Feb; 18(2):101068. PubMed ID: 38237477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of macro- and micro-genetic environmental sensitivity in unbalanced datasets.
    Madsen MD; van der Werf J; Börner V; Mulder HA; Clark S
    Animal; 2021 Dec; 15(12):100411. PubMed ID: 34837779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genetic correlations between growth performance and carcass traits of purebred and crossbred pigs raised in tropical and temperate climates1.
    Godinho RM; Bergsma R; Silva FF; Sevillano CA; Knol EF; Komen H; Guimarães SEF; Lopes MS; Bastiaansen JWM
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Sep; 97(9):3648-3657. PubMed ID: 31278865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genetic correlation and heritabilities for purebred and crossbred performance in poultry egg production traits.
    Wei M; van der Werf JH
    J Anim Sci; 1995 Aug; 73(8):2220-6. PubMed ID: 8567456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating the purebred-crossbred genetic correlation of body weight in broiler chickens with pedigree or genomic relationships.
    Duenk P; Calus MPL; Wientjes YCJ; Breen VP; Henshall JM; Hawken R; Bijma P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Feb; 51(1):6. PubMed ID: 30782121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Animal board invited review: The purebred-crossbred genetic correlation in poultry.
    Calus MPL; Wientjes YCJ; Bos J; Duenk P
    Animal; 2023 Nov; 17(11):100997. PubMed ID: 37820407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating the purebred-crossbred genetic correlation for uniformity of eggshell color in laying hens.
    Mulder HA; Visscher J; Fablet J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 May; 48(1):39. PubMed ID: 27151311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of sire contribution and breed-of-origin of alleles in a three-way crossbred broiler dataset.
    Calus MPL; Vandenplas J; Hulsegge I; Borg R; Henshall JM; Hawken R
    Poult Sci; 2019 Dec; 98(12):6270-6280. PubMed ID: 31393589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genetic parameters of foot-pad dermatitis and body weight in purebred broiler lines in 2 contrasting environments.
    Kapell DN; Hill WG; Neeteson AM; McAdam J; Koerhuis AN; Avendaño S
    Poult Sci; 2012 Mar; 91(3):565-74. PubMed ID: 22334731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A bivariate genomic model with additive, dominance and inbreeding depression effects for sire line and three-way crossbred pigs.
    Christensen OF; Nielsen B; Su G; Xiang T; Madsen P; Ostersen T; Velander I; Strathe AB
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Aug; 51(1):45. PubMed ID: 31426753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Model definition for genetic evaluation of purebred and crossbred lambs including heterosis.
    Vargas Jurado N; Notter DR; Taylor JB; Brown DJ; Mousel MR; Lewis RM
    J Anim Sci; 2022 Jun; 100(6):. PubMed ID: 35696612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genetic parameters and purebred-crossbred genetic correlations for growth, meat quality, and carcass traits in pigs.
    Esfandyari H; Thekkoot D; Kemp R; Plastow G; Dekkers J
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Dec; 98(12):. PubMed ID: 33325519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pedigree and genomic evaluation of pigs using a terminal-cross model.
    Tusell L; Gilbert H; Riquet J; Mercat MJ; Legarra A; Larzul C
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Apr; 48():32. PubMed ID: 27056443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Imputation of non-genotyped F1 dams to improve genetic gain in swine crossbreeding programs.
    See GM; Fix JS; Schwab CR; Spangler ML
    J Anim Sci; 2022 May; 100(5):. PubMed ID: 35451025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Selective genotyping and phenotypic data inclusion strategies of crossbred progeny for combined crossbred and purebred selection in swine breeding.
    See GM; Mote BE; Spangler ML
    J Anim Sci; 2021 Mar; 99(3):. PubMed ID: 33560334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genetic correlations between two strains of Durocs and crossbreds from differing production environments for slaughter traits.
    Zumbach B; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Holl J; Herring W; Long T
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Apr; 85(4):901-8. PubMed ID: 17178815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Leveraging low-density crossbred genotypes to offset crossbred phenotypes and their impact on purebred predictions.
    Leite NG; Chen CY; Herring WO; Holl J; Tsuruta S; Lourenco D
    J Anim Sci; 2022 Dec; 100(12):. PubMed ID: 36309902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of genomic information to exploit genotype-by-environment interactions for body weight of broiler chicken in bio-secure and production environments.
    Chu TT; Bastiaansen JWM; Berg P; Romé H; Marois D; Henshall J; Jensen J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Sep; 51(1):50. PubMed ID: 31533614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimation of genetic variance for macro- and micro-environmental sensitivity using double hierarchical generalized linear models.
    Mulder HA; Rönnegård L; Fikse WF; Veerkamp RF; Strandberg E
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Jul; 45(1):23. PubMed ID: 23827014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.